How to talk to believers of COVID-19 conspiracy theories

Nathan

SF VIP
Conspiracy theories abound these days, some people are attracted to embracing such stories, and indeed it can be challenging to verify facts.

Just to clarify:
Code:
fact
/fakt/
noun
noun: fact; plural noun: facts

    a thing that is known or proved to be true.

Conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are causing real-world problems by discouraging some people from getting vaccinated, wearing masks or following other guidelines. Some bizarre theories about the virus have prompted believers to burn 5G cell towers, shut down vaccination clinics or even ingest poisons touted as cures.

Experts on misinformation and psychology interviewed by The Associated Press offer several tips for individuals wondering how to talk to friends or family who believe conspiracy theories about COVID-19. Here’s what they suggest:

LISTEN, DON’T PREACH: Believers in conspiracy theories aren’t likely to be swayed by people who mock their views. Instead of lecturing, listen and ask questions about how they became interested in the conspiracy theory, where they get their information, and whether they’ve considered other explanations. Whenever possible, have the conversation offline.

STAY CALM: Arguing with someone about conspiracy theories is likely to result only in higher blood pressure. Remember that some people won’t change their mind no matter what you say, and arguing over the proven benefits of mask wearing or vaccines isn’t likely to convince them.

BE WARY OF CONTENT THAT PLAYS ON EMOTIONS: Misinformation and conspiracy theories often exploit anger, fear or other emotions. Be cautious of content that features strongly emotional language, or that seems intended to make you outraged. If you read something that really gets you fired up, wait until your emotions have cooled before reposting or sending to friends.

As for increasing your own defenses against conspiracy theories and misinformation about the virus (or any other topic), experts suggest the following:

EXPAND YOUR MEDIA DIET: Checking a variety of news sources — including some mainstream local, national and international outlets — is the best way of staying informed and avoiding rabbit holes of misinformation and conspiracy theories. Don’t rely solely on social media for your news.

CHECK SOURCES: Look to see who wrote the content, and who is quoted in it. Are they named? Do they have a position, or experience, that lends credibility to their claims? Are other viewpoints expressed in the article? Be wary of claims made by “insiders,” anonymous internet posters or anyone citing hearsay as fact. Also, check the dates: Misinformation peddlers often post old photos or news stories and claim they’re new.

VERIFY EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS: If you read something that makes an incredible claim — one that seems too good, too awful or too weird to be true — check to see if it’s being reported elsewhere. If it’s an important story, other outlets will confirm the details. Be cautious of explosive claims if they’re only being made on one website or by one social media user. apnews
 

People in this forum have posted crazy conspiracy theories as "facts." I prefer not to have any interaction with them, whatsoever. The same goes for real life. I have a neighbor that believes the crap propagated on cable "news." I hate to be rude, but he's annoying as hell, and I've gotten to the point where I just walk away rather than try to be "nice."
 
Exactly who is the judge as to what is or isn't a conspiracy theory and who or who isn't a conspiracy theorist? Is is something or somebody that is different from what you think? Is the main stream media the judge (e.g. average who says what the most)? Some folks here are a little quick to label others who post things that disagree with their "supposedly mainstream" thought. Such behavior is judgemental and not open minded. Instead of crying CONSPIRACY and feeling smug, how about digging a little deeper into the issue and respecting others view points.
 
For all of us who don't know what this is, here's a Wikipedia snapshot explanation:
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a hypothetical cognitive bias stating that people with low ability at a task overestimate their ability.
Is referencing Wikipedia the basis of your psychology degree. How long have you been practicing such you are qualified to diagnose that in others?
 
Conspiracy theories abound these days, some people are attracted to embracing such stories, and indeed it can be challenging to verify facts.

Just to clarify:
Code:
fact
/fakt/
noun
noun: fact; plural noun: facts

    a thing that is known or proved to be true.

Conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are causing real-world problems by discouraging some people from getting vaccinated, wearing masks or following other guidelines. Some bizarre theories about the virus have prompted believers to burn 5G cell towers, shut down vaccination clinics or even ingest poisons touted as cures.

Experts on misinformation and psychology interviewed by The Associated Press offer several tips for individuals wondering how to talk to friends or family who believe conspiracy theories about COVID-19. Here’s what they suggest:

LISTEN, DON’T PREACH: Believers in conspiracy theories aren’t likely to be swayed by people who mock their views. Instead of lecturing, listen and ask questions about how they became interested in the conspiracy theory, where they get their information, and whether they’ve considered other explanations. Whenever possible, have the conversation offline.

STAY CALM: Arguing with someone about conspiracy theories is likely to result only in higher blood pressure. Remember that some people won’t change their mind no matter what you say, and arguing over the proven benefits of mask wearing or vaccines isn’t likely to convince them.

BE WARY OF CONTENT THAT PLAYS ON EMOTIONS: Misinformation and conspiracy theories often exploit anger, fear or other emotions. Be cautious of content that features strongly emotional language, or that seems intended to make you outraged. If you read something that really gets you fired up, wait until your emotions have cooled before reposting or sending to friends.

As for increasing your own defenses against conspiracy theories and misinformation about the virus (or any other topic), experts suggest the following:

EXPAND YOUR MEDIA DIET: Checking a variety of news sources — including some mainstream local, national and international outlets — is the best way of staying informed and avoiding rabbit holes of misinformation and conspiracy theories. Don’t rely solely on social media for your news.

CHECK SOURCES: Look to see who wrote the content, and who is quoted in it. Are they named? Do they have a position, or experience, that lends credibility to their claims? Are other viewpoints expressed in the article? Be wary of claims made by “insiders,” anonymous internet posters or anyone citing hearsay as fact. Also, check the dates: Misinformation peddlers often post old photos or news stories and claim they’re new.

VERIFY EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS: If you read something that makes an incredible claim — one that seems too good, too awful or too weird to be true — check to see if it’s being reported elsewhere. If it’s an important story, other outlets will confirm the details. Be cautious of explosive claims if they’re only being made on one website or by one social media user. apnews
Well, there could be a problem with that bit of advice. Sometimes conspiracy theories turn out to be true. Here's one SOURCE that says that's happened.
 
Not at all. I love talking to people who do not think as I do. That is why I engage on forums like this one. However past experience has taught me that there are a few topics where fixed positions leave no common middle ground where fruitful interaction can occur. So I back off.
Perhaps there's common ground in just respecting their position and not having to attack what they say, put them down or cry "conspiracy".
 
Exactly who is the judge as to what is or isn't a conspiracy theory and who or who isn't a conspiracy theorist? Is is something or somebody that is different from what you think? Is the main stream media the judge (e.g. average who says what the most)? Some folks here are a little quick to label others who post things that disagree with their "supposedly mainstream" thought. Such behavior is judgemental and not open minded. Instead of crying CONSPIRACY and feeling smug, how about digging a little deeper into the issue and respecting others view points.
Yo Jon. Looks like you beat me to it. :D :D
Exactly... How about some conspiracy theories that turned out to be correct. Some of these I myself have been chastised for wearing a tin-foil hat a little too tight. :)
I particularly enjoyed the Canadian "Gaydar" machine.

Conspiracy: The CIA was testing LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs on Americans in a top-secret experiment on behavior modification.

The truth: The program was known as MK-ULTRA, and it was real. The CIA started by using volunteers; the novelist Ken Kesey was one notable subject. But the program heads soon began dosing people without their knowledge; MK-ULTRA left many victims permanently
mentally disabled

Conspiracy: With the advances in technology, the government is using its vast resources to track citizens.

The truth: In 2016, government agencies sent 49,868 requests for user data to Facebook, 27,850 to Google, and 9,076 to Apple, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (the EFF), a major nonprofit organization that defends civil liberties in the digital
world and advises the public on matters of internet privacy.

Conspiracy: For decades, tobacco companies buried evidence that smoking is deadly.

The truth: At the beginning of the 1950s, research was showing an indisputable statistical link between smoking and lung cancer, but it wasn’t until the late 1990s that Philip Morris,the nation’s largest cigarette maker at the time, even admitted that smoking could cause
cancer.

Conspiracy: The Gulf of Tonkin incident on August 2, 1964, was faked to provoke American support for the Vietnam War.

The truth: By the time news reached American ears, the facts surrounding the North Vietnamese attack on the American Naval ship Maddox were already fuzzy. Declassified intelligence documents have since revealed that the Maddox had provided support for
South Vietnamese attacks on a nearby island and that the North Vietnamese were responding in kind, according to the U.S. Naval Institute

Conspiracy: The Canada government was so paranoid about homosexuality that it developed a “gaydar” machine.

The truth: It really happened: In the 1960s, the government hired a university professor to develop a way to detect homosexuality in federal employees. He came up with a machine that measured pupil dilation in response to same-sex-erotic imagery; the Canadian
government used it to exclude or fire more than 400 men from civil service, the military, and the Mounties.


gaydar.jpg
 
Perhaps there's common ground in just respecting their position and not having to attack what they say, put them down or cry "conspiracy".
You keep trying to put words in my mouth. My position is to respect their point of view without endorsing it and I choose not to attack because that is the very definition of engaging.

That is not to say that I do not make my own position known on a forum such as this but I would hope that I don't attack people because they think differently. Over my life time I have changed my thinking on a number of issues many times. I like to call that growth.

My position on conspiracy theories (take the faking of the lunar landings as an example) is that too many people would have to be conspiring to deceive many millions for some nefarious reason. A conspiracy only works when the number of conspirators is small and all of them are sworn to silence. Conspiracies of silence designed to cover up embarrassing or criminal behaviour are very real.
 
My position on conspiracy theories (take the faking of the lunar landings as an example) is that too many people would have to be conspiring to deceive many millions for some nefarious reason. A conspiracy only works when the number of conspirators is small and all of them are sworn to silence. Conspiracies of silence designed to cover up embarrassing or criminal behaviour are very real.
Exactly.
 
Nathan, the advice in your post (and Paco's) is good common sense, when talking with conspiracy theorists who are just shooting their mouths off. But I wonder if all of these theories should be ignored. What about the ones making paranoid accusations against particular racial or ethnic groups? Isn't that one method they use to stir up trouble?

Example: "The coronavirus was developed in a lab by (name your group), and then deliberately spread. They want to kill people, and developed the perfect weapon. This is known to be a fact, and anyone denying it is part of the conspiracy."

Down through history, conspiracy theories have been used to incite hatred. It isn't always enough to just change the subject.
 
P.S. One argument I have frequently used on these forums (probably without changing anyone's mind) is: If so-and-so were really true, wouldn't it be all over the airwaves, the news headlines, the Internet, etc.? How come only you and the "chosen few" know about it?
 
I don't engage in debate of controversial subjects. Frankly I don't care what people think about silly rhetoric as usual there are no clear answers on either side but people like to make point converting others to think as they do. More or less an egotistical power trip. When it is all said and done Who Cares?
 
Perhaps there's common ground in just respecting their position and not having to attack what they say, put them down or cry "conspiracy".
@JonDouglas , you seem to be an intelligent, educated person, you also seem to like "stirring the pot" with posts containing controversial(your words) material. So...be happy with and enjoy the reaction that you asked for.
 


Back
Top