Gabby Petito Case

mellowyellow said:
View attachment 186296

All four of Gabby’s parents proudly show their tattoos. “Let it Be” is what Gabby had on her arm and now they do too.

Some people might consider this odd behaviour.
Click to expand...
I also think it is odd behavior to do it so close to when she died. They had the rest of their lives to get a Tatoo. Especially the phrase "Let it Be "
 

Must we nit-pick every damn thing ??

Just what sort of & how many odd actions would anyone here consider, do blindly in grief, if any of you all lost a young loved one ?

Perhaps one or more of her 'joint' parents thought it would be a nice forever tribute to her ...... in their hour of sure grief .

I don't understand it myself but ...... whatever they can do [legally] to make their tomorrow better........... I support.

R.I.P. ...... Miss Petito
 
I have a regular drone. It's $205.00 Then I know guys/gals that have the ones with thermal imaging the cost in the thousands. They do find people with dementia & lost animals.

If the Laundrie family lived in this State they could be arrested & held accountable for helping a "possible" criminal evade capture. Seen it happen many times till one or other broke down & told where the person could be.
 
Dog the Bounty hunter says he's offering $10,000 of his own money for information that leads to the capture of Brian Laundrie - the last person to see Gabby Petito alive.
 
rgp said:
Must we nit-pick every damn thing ??
Click to expand...
I think so, gossiping is human nature and since we are all strangers the only people we know in common are those we find in the news. It can be fun... see https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-22/edition-1/gossip-tales-human-condition and https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-gender-ourselves/201408/why-we-love-gossip
OneEyedDiva said:
I would not be surprised if "Dog" is the one who finds him first.
Click to expand...
Not if he's hiding in my neighborhood, then he's mine. I've been out with my dog looking, found a lot of people, none that look much like Brian so far. The search continues...
 
Last edited:
His family has an older male relative in NC, and in addition to possible help from him, Brian might have had contact with his sister, too. (Didn't know he had a sister)
Any thoughts on those bits?

Also, Their family's lawyer says now, that the FBI might already know where Brian is. Anyone here think so?
 
Kaila said:
His family has an older male relative in NC, and in addition to possible help from him, Brian might have had contact with his sister, too. (Didn't know he had a sister)
Any thoughts on those bits?

Also, Their family's lawyer says now, that the FBI might already know where Brian is. Anyone here think so?
Click to expand...
I still want to know why he's still only a "person of interest" since her body was found? Why would the FBI not bring him in if they know where he is? It all seems peculiar to me.
 
OneEyedDiva said:
I still want to know why he's still only a "person of interest" since her body was found? Why would the FBI not bring him in if they know where he is? It all seems peculiar to me.
Click to expand...
It's just a phrase often used by law enforcement in an attempt to calm a suspect on the slim chance he might turn himself in.
If they were to say "We're gonna get him because we know he did it," he may be more determined to avoid capture.
 
OneEyedDiva said:
I still want to know why he's still only a "person of interest" since her body was found? Why would the FBI not bring him in if they know where he is? It all seems peculiar to me.
Click to expand...
I think it's because #1 there is no physical evidence to connect him to Gabby's death. His DNA would be all over her anyway because they lived for months in a van together. His skin under her fingernails would have been the kind of evidence they needed so clearly they do not have that. #2 I think a lot of people learned a great deal from the Scott and Laci Peterson case. Scott did cooperate with police and they crucified him. Never even checked on the many reports of people saying they saw Laci the day of her disappearance AFTER Scott left to go fishing so maybe BL's lawyer is just protecting his client. It's what lawyer's do.

It's unforgivable that police were not watching him more closely. They messed up in my humble opinion.
 
These are all interesting comments.
I agree that perhaps the family's lawyer is just trying to deflect attention and criticisms away from his parents, by making numerous confusing public statements like that one.
 
A lost and dazed man allegedly waved down Dennis Davis on Waterville Road, where the Appalachian Trail runs nearby the border of North Carolina and Tennessee. The man believed to be Laundrie pulled his car up alongside Mr Davis to ask for directions to California using only back roads and refused his suggestion to take nearby Interstate 40. “He said ‘man, I’m lost.’ I said ‘what are you trying to find?’ and he said ‘me and my girlfriend got in a fight but she called me, told me she loves me, and I have to get to California to see her.’ Mr Davis is frustrated three calls to the FBI and 911 calls in both North Carolina and Tennessee have not been returned by law enforcement.
 
If that really was Brian then he really is having delusions, and that's so sad for all concerned. They may find him soon if he's driving around in a state of confusion.
 
Wow, now the parents' lawyer says that Brian left his parents house, to go hiking on a different day, than they'd told police?!!!
:eek:

WHat!o_O I get it, that I myself can get days mixed up, but their son left to go hiking alone, while they were all extremely upset by the situation he and they were in, and then he did not come back when expected. They don't know how long he'd been gone?:rolleyes: They'd claimed they were worried about him. o_O

And then, they reported him to authorities, as missing.....
(serious stuff, right?:unsure:)
And they did not take care to get the day he left, correctly?:oops:

His parents (neither one) would know which day? Or be able to figure it out, that he left on Monday and not on Tuesday, when it is only a few days and nights later? But long enough to get nervous and to alert police, to start a search?

(That means, that if they truly had seen him for the last time, that day, he'd had an extra day's head start before the searches began, than what they'd reported)

And now, weeks later, they suddenly remember, or can figure out the past events, more accurately?
Does any of this sound even possibly believable to you? :oops::rolleyes::cautious::cry:
 
Granny B. said:
It's pretty clear to me, Brian did it. If he was a decent guy and innocent he would step up to help the police find Gabby's killer.
Click to expand...
He wouldn't if he were being unjustly accused. He'd be afraid he'd get railroaded for the crime.

I can give examples of times that has happened. I know a guy who was unjustly arrested for a crime he did not commit, by the FBI. It took my husband a lot of work to get the case dropped. A higher level FBI person looked over the (lack of) evidence, and finally stepped in. This guy was not a criminal, but his landlord was, and they gathered up this guy by mistake (which for many years they did not admit to).

In another case, my husband convinced the appeals court to hear just one more appeal that the defendant was not entitled to. The defendant had spent nearly 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. There was no evidence against him, but there was evidence of a police department that decided the guy did the crime, even though he was not there and over 20 witnesses told the police that when those witnesses were at the site of the crime as it was committed. How could this happen? Race issues.

I agree, however, that he is the most likely suspect by a large margin. Still, If I were in the situation and did not commit the crime, I would be afraid to come forward. That doesn't mean I would not, it means I would be stupid, though.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top