I'm not so sure about that. I would agree that, through the ages, males have been trained to use their natural aggression to dominate, and females have been trained to limit their natural tendency to nurture to raising kids and caring for their husbands, but girls (and women) are way more stubborn than boys (and men).I disagree, i think females are more conditioned (programmed, brainwashed?) Into needing to be liked. By family members, teachers, employers. The same behaviors get labeled differently in some familes: a boy who won't give up his position on something may be labeled 'persistent', if his sister behaves thw same she is called stubborn. Since one has positive connotations and the other negative it is not even necessary, tho the family may verbalize that stubborn is unattractive in a 'girl'.
But you can say that the majority of men or the majority of women have natural tendencies directly linked to their gender...because certain behavioral tendencies are linked to hormones.We are all individual personalities. You cannot say all men or all women feel the same way about anything.
I don't see a natural tendency to nurture husbands except not doing so earns a punch or a shove. Kids, ok; but taking care of adults is being taken by the situation.I'm not so sure about that. I would agree that, through the ages, males have been trained to use their natural aggression to dominate, and females have been trained to limit their natural tendency to nurture to raising kids and caring for their husbands, but girls (and women) are way more stubborn than boys (and men).
sounds like you know my kidsgirls (and women) are way more stubborn than boys (and men).
I know mine. I had 2 sons...and then came Maud.sounds like you know my kids![]()
But notice I said "trained to"....trained (by society) to limit that tendency to home and hearth.I don't see a natural tendency to nurture husbands except not doing so earns a punch or a shove. Kids, ok; but taking care of adults is being taken by the situation.
They sound like jerks.Very interesting thoughts from everyone; thanks. I started the discussion because I've noticed that my Huzz and several of his friends and one as-close-as-a-brother cousin all seem to admire--from the way they talk anyway--people (some famous, some they know IRL, locals) who have come right out and said that they couldn't care less if anybody likes them, they just want to be maybe respected but certainly feared, that that's the only way to succeed and "get things done" in this world. And I see that a lot online too, people admiring the same "qualities", i.e. ruthlessness.
Ruthlessness is a whole 'nother thing, imo. But men are definitely taught that sometimes you have to be ruthless to get ahead.Very interesting thoughts from everyone; thanks. I started the discussion because I've noticed that my Huzz and several of his friends and one as-close-as-a-brother cousin all seem to admire--from the way they talk anyway--people (some famous, some they know IRL, locals) who have come right out and said that they couldn't care less if anybody likes them, they just want to be maybe respected but certainly feared, that that's the only way to succeed and "get things done" in this world. And I see that a lot online too, people admiring the same "qualities", i.e. ruthlessness.
They are not called 'bitches' for doing so. At least that's what I've heard.Ruthlessness is a whole 'nother thing, imo. But men are definitely taught that sometimes you have to be ruthless to get ahead.
You heard right. In fact, some of them are called kings of their industry. And usually they could attract members of the opposite sex based on their "achievements" alone....if by achievements you mean money, in which case we're alluding to a different kind of "bitches".They are not called 'bitches' for doing so. At least that's what I've heard.![]()
I really did wonder how members would reply. And I really did not mean for it to be "click baitish". Sigh.Wondered how members would reply haha. The OP's question is a bit click baitish as one will expect most to respond denying such a narrow behavior.
It's not.I really did wonder how members would reply. And I really did not mean for it to be "click baitish". Sigh.![]()
Unfortunately, too many people think 'respect' is the same as 'fear.'officerripley >>>"Do men really not care if they're liked and only want to be respected (and sometimes, feared) as almost all the men I've known have said? Or is it an act to maybe feel or appear to be more manly?"
should be: Do [some] men really [sometimes] not care if they're liked [by those they know well] and only want to be respected (and sometimes, feared) as almost all the men I've known have said? Or is it an act to maybe feel or appear to be more manly?
Wondered how members would reply haha. The OP's question is a bit click baitish as one will expect most to respond denying such a narrow behavior. Reality is most of us with our heads screwed onto the right place, neither like nor dislike the majority of strangers we meet, but given fairness are rather neutral, only slightly categorizing new acquaintances. In our adult workplaces and out in public, this is much more so in order to show mature, professional interpersonal communications.
Now with personal friends, relatives, close job work mates, and possible romantic acquaintances, the question has more to discuss. True for some but in any case much depends on specific circumstance. In most situations, respect is all that is important, not liking or disliking.
Ditto, this way too.Ditto what @JaniceM said.
Utah is not monolithic! I know in the more populated areas things are different. Hope you are in a place you feel safe now.As you know I live I Utah as well. When we moved back to our town I was excited. Then there was a kidnaping, three streets over, and murder later. Then there was a murder, one street over. Glad I sold the house. No place is safe.
@officerripleyI guess it'd be good to be liked
Not earth shattering either way
Oh, I guess because I think being liked is great and hard for some of us to accomplish or live without and it seems cold to not care at all if someone likes you; humans spent hundreds of thousands of years evolving into societies (the hunter/gatherer tribes we lived in for at least 25,000 years) wherein you had to at least get along with and probably preferably like/be liked by the people you lived in such quarters with. So it seems like the loner lifestyle is going to feel unnatural for most of us. I don't mean unnatural as in good or evil, right or wrong; I mean as in what naturally worked the best for humans for thousands of years and still does for most of us.
Well said.I doubt wanting to be liked is a male/female thing. I believe it is a strong human emotion to be liked, and well thought of.
Yeah, seems you and I are at opposite ends on that.So, yeah, I find guns (and any other deadly weapons: knives, gallows, guillotines, crosses, electric chairs, etc.) to be sad and scary. (I know, I know, it's only the gun owners who are the scary ones not the guns themselves but the guns and jokes about 'em () are scary to me; I just find death to be sad and unfunny. But that's just me.)