Another Example of Our Pathetic Justice System. Mother is Forced to Kill Armed Intruder

I had a husky shepherd mix that was a wonderful dog but would have died for me. He was a rescue and I was his 4th home at 8 years old. He saved me when an off leash pit bull attacked me for no reason. I always felt safe with him.
Yay to shepherd-huskies!

While my first wife had a golden-shepherd mix, I had a husky-shepherd.

Boy, those were great dogs!

They died, wow, back in '83, within two week of each other, age 12. The second one to go just quit eating.

Dogs and cats are great, aren't they?
 

I would shoot him and drag him inside.
OT: Reminded me of a 'Company benefits' tale passed on to me in Riyadh - guy conducting the seminar apparently told his audience that insurance payments would be higher for those actively on the job.....he said that, if he was to have a heart attack and die, his wife had instructions to drag him outside and toss his briefcase down the driveway......."He was on his way to work!"
 
Farrah Nuff said:
What if the person was lost and only
wanted to ask directions?

If he was attempting to break in and had a weapon, he is not there to get his bearing.

What is your expertise on constitutional law?

That is not material. It only happened to concern a gun as a Constitutional element. State criminal laws control in a case like this.
 

Likely much harder to be killed or attend the funerals of her kids.
Yes, killing wasn't her only choice. She could have allowed herself to be raped & beaten to death, then allowed her kids to be at a thug's mercy. How selfish of her!
win, I don't always agree with you but really what was this woman to do? 5am. Likely the family was asleep. Appears a career criminal. I think she exercised her only choice. Had she not had that gun, it could have been the family dead.
 

Another Example of Our Pathetic Justice System. Mother is Forced to Kill Armed Intruder.


Just an FYI. There are some states in the U.S. that have a Duty-to-Retreat law. I believe this means a person must use all proper means of escape before resorting to physical combat.
 

Another Example of Our Pathetic Justice System. Mother is Forced to Kill Armed Intruder.


Just an FYI. There are some states in the U.S. that have a Duty-to-Retreat law. I believe this means a person must use all proper means of escape before resorting to physical combat.
I wouldn't live in a state run by morons.
 
Anything is possible. Your view us one, mine is another. Why should one accept your view over mine?

And not every woman would have jept a gun in the first place. Calling anyone "sheeple" seems disrespectful.

You have your beliefs, I, in turn, have mine.

Thanks for sharing but I think that you're just as wrong in your view as you seem to feel that I am in mine. I guess that we can agree to disagree.

But ask yourself, who would Jesus shoot?
Well, if Jesus could shoot, he might shoot the intruder who was about to commit evil on an innocent family.
 
Well, if Jesus could shoot, he might shoot the intruder who was about to commit evil on an innocent family.
I can recall a quote from a film that was real funny, to me at least.

This conservative-minded, somewhat macho young American guy was arguing with some European friends who went on and on about Americans being violent by nature, as proved by the firearms-related deaths.

He retorted, "We're not any more violent, we're just better shots."
 

Another Example of Our Pathetic Justice System. Mother is Forced to Kill Armed Intruder.


Just an FYI. There are some states in the U.S. that have a Duty-to-Retreat law. I believe this means a person must use all proper means of escape before resorting to physical combat.
Are you speaking of the duty to retreat from the home or in public?
 
Why would there be any need to drag anyone inside after you shot them?
Is that what it says to do, somewhere in the Constitution of the United States?
And armed with what? I'm not saying that the OP intruder wasn't up to no good
but what constitutes armed enough that you would shoot someone outside of your
dwelling and then drag them inside afterward? What if the person was lost and only
wanted to ask directions? What is your expertise on constitutional law?
In most states, in order to justify shooting and killing an intruder, one must prove that the intruder has gained entrance to one's abode. Some police will tell those who apply for weapons permits, to be sure that if you shoot anyone on your doorstep, be certain he falls inward and not outward.
 
In most states, in order to justify shooting and killing an intruder, one must prove that the intruder has gained entrance to one's abode. Some police will tell those who apply for weapons permits, to be sure that if you shoot anyone on your doorstep, be certain he falls inward and not outward.
That is a basic misnomer. I am not saying it has not been told before, but it would be quite illegal to do so.
 
Not in NJ, it isn't, my friend.
My chief of police said it to everyone who came to the department for a gun permit.
Like I said, that may be that it was told, but not legal. First, it would be tampering with evidence. Second, is the person going to tell them they shot him in the house when he was not? Another criminal offense, falsifying evidence. The chief is not the prosecutor too.
 
In most states, in order to justify shooting and killing an intruder, one must prove that the intruder has gained entrance to one's abode. Some police will tell those who apply for weapons permits, to be sure that if you shoot anyone on your doorstep, be certain he falls inward and not outward.
Not to split hairs, but the prosecution would have to prove that he did not gain entrance.

I sure hope I never need to be in that situation. I have no doubt that in any choice where it looks like it's either the intruder's safety or me and my family,'s safety, I'm always going to choose my family.

But it can't be any fun shooting someone. This I do not want.
 
Not to split hairs, but the prosecution would have to prove that he did not gain entrance.

I sure hope I never need to be in that situation. I have no doubt that in any choice where it looks like it's either the intruder's safety or me and my family,'s safety, I'm always going to choose my family.

But it can't be any fun shooting someone. This I do not want.
Ditto. Nor would I want to be shot or stabbed. Sends shudders up my spine just thinking about it.
 
Right. Let him list them.
As far as I can find to some degree they are Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island. To add: after further research the website listed below states " None of the states with a duty to retreat require that a person retreat in their own home".

I am not endorse the website linked below. It is just a source of information on the internet. Information found on the internet is not necessarily valid.

https://www.uslawshield.com/duty-to-retreat/
 

Last edited:

Back
Top