I'm sure @Bretrick feels better for having had a gripe, better an empty house than a bad tenant.I'd just let it pass. A gripe is a gripe.

I'm sure @Bretrick feels better for having had a gripe, better an empty house than a bad tenant.I'd just let it pass. A gripe is a gripe.
Sorry, but remarks about the "extreme left" or any other political entity are not tolerated in this forum and could be a reason for being banned. Granted, it was almost guaranteed that any thread about Capitalism would lead to politics but...
"It is worth noting that the concentration of wealth among the top 1% of the population does not necessarily indicate that the country is in a deep depression." Well now you are just changing your original comment. I never said that.The concentration of wealth among the top 1% of the population has been a subject of much debate and criticism. While some argue that capitalism promotes economic growth and innovation, others argue that it exacerbates income inequality and leads to social and economic instability .
It is worth noting that the concentration of wealth among the top 1% of the population does not necessarily indicate that the country is in a deep depression. However, it can lead to social and economic instability, as it can exacerbate income inequality and limit opportunities for those who are not part of the wealthy elite.
In order to address these issues, many countries have implemented policies to redistribute wealth and provide a social safety net for those in need. These policies can help to reduce income inequality and promote social and economic stability .
Just to point out. the extreme left is an ideology not a political party. The extreme left follows an ideology of socialism, leaning marxism and in some cases communism. So you may inferred that I was referring to a certain political party, I didn't name a political party.
If my comments are a reason for being banned, then fine.
If that is the case, then many others should fall into the same category.
1. I never brought up the country being in a deep depression. You first asserted that here : Another minor gripe about the capitalist system1. "It is worth noting that the concentration of wealth among the top 1% of the population does not necessarily indicate that the country is in a deep depression." Well now you are just changing your original comment. I never said that.
Any country can alter the inequality by flooding their country with millions of poor people or attracting successful people.
2. The US has free open borders for the world to send us as many people they want, even help them to get to the border. In the last 3 years millions of people are streaming across our border. That would surely increase the inequality.
Is that what we are trying to achieve as a country? A race to the bottom? Where we punish successful people? If that is the case, we are doing a great job in the race to the bottom.
Any point you make using 3. Finland, Norway, etc. as a model is false. Those countries do not let millions of people in with open borders. They do not let in criminals, rapists, terrorist groups like the US does. Countries are emptying their jails and sending them to the US border. You think Norway and Finland and Sweden are doing that? No.
Its no wonder successful people are leaving the country.
No need to go back and forth when your basic premise is we need to punish successful people. 3. The problem we have in this country is people want handouts, not work. Terrorists organizations are coming here and getting free housing, free food, free medical, cell phones, etc. Is that what we want?
There are several satellite companies providing the same service....If you don't like your cable company where do you take your business?
Your number 2 (pun intended), if true, explain more than 3 million illegals already i the country and thousands more pouring over the border every week....yes, we have laws, but no one is enforcing them.1. I never brought up the country being in a deep depression. You first asserted that here : Another minor gripe about the capitalist system
2. this statement is not true. The US does not have free open borders for the world to send as many people as they want. The US has immigration laws and policies that regulate the entry of foreign nationals into the country 1.
In fact, the US has been implementing strict border control measures to prevent unauthorized entry into the country. For instance, the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has been using various technologies and tools to secure the US borders, including drones, cameras, and sensors 1.
According to the CBP, the number of people apprehended at the US-Mexico border has been increasing since 2020, but it is not true that
millions of people are streaming across the border 1. In addition, there is no evidence to suggest that immigration increases inequality
3. it is not true that countries are emptying their jails and sending criminals, rapists, and terrorist groups to the US border. The US has immigration laws and policies that regulate the entry of foreign nationals into the country 2. The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has been using various technologies and tools to secure the US borders, including drones, cameras, and sensors
I can't find any evidence that this is happening. Maybe you could provide evidence of which countries and the impact it is having on the economy?
4. It is not true that terrorist organizations are coming to the US and getting free housing, free food, free medical, cell phones, etc123.
In fact, the US has been implementing strict border control measures to prevent unauthorized entry into the country. For instance, the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has been using various technologies and tools to secure the US borders, including drones, cameras, and sensors 1.
Regarding the claim that people want handouts, not work, it is important to note that this is a complex issue that cannot be reduced to a simple binary. While there may be some individuals who abuse the welfare system, there are also many people who rely on social safety net programs to make ends meet during difficult times 1.
It is worth noting that social safety net programs have been shown to reduce poverty and inequality, and provide a lifeline for millions of people in need
Your number 2 (pun intended), if true, explain more than 3 million illegals already i the country and thousands more pouring over the border every week....yes, we have laws, but no one is enforcing them.
Do you actually read what you copy/paste?Illegal immigration is a complex issue that has been a matter of intense debate in the United States for decades. According to Statista, the population of unauthorized immigrants in the United States has been estimated to be around 11.39 million people 1. However, it is important to note that this number has seemingly stabilized after a period of rapid growth.
In recent years, the amount of alien encounters by the United States Border Patrol has significantly increased, with 2,214,652 registered alien apprehensions and expulsions recorded in 2022 1. In addition, there were 568 immigrant deaths recorded near the southwest border in the U.S., the greatest number reported by the United States Border Patrol since 1998, suggesting that illegal immigration may be on the rise again 1.
It is worth noting that the issue of illegal immigration is a multifaceted one, and there are many factors that contribute to it. Some of these factors include economic opportunities, political instability, and social unrest in the countries of origin of the immigrants 2.
As for the enforcement of laws, the United States has a complex system of immigration laws and regulations, and the enforcement of these laws is carried out by various agencies, including the United States Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 3. However, the issue of illegal immigration is a complex one, and there are many factors that contribute to it. Some of these factors include economic opportunities, political instability, and social unrest in the countries of origin of the immigrants
Sorry, but remarks about the "extreme left" or any other political entity are not tolerated in this forum and could be a reason for being banned. Granted, it was almost guaranteed that any thread about Capitalism would lead to politics but...
However, it is my belief that our "Free Enterprise" has to be reigned in a bit. There is too much greed, corruption, collusion at the moment. In the effort (as one example) to please stockholders we have been getting wages that are sub-par!The essence of Capitalism, or Free Enterprise as I prefer to call it, is take your business elsewhere if you don’t like the quality, selection, price, or service. It works and has proven to produce a thriving economy from which we all benefit.
Did the Manager call you? What was his response?I have another one ...
On my c/card statement from Bob Evans restaurant [carry-out,that was supposed to be curb-side pick up] What is a "Third Party Fee" ?
$1.90 charged. I think it is the curb-side pick fee .... which as I noted , curb-side was not available. Walk in/carry-out only . Now when I call to inquire , I am put on hold and told the manager is "with a customer" .... I'll keep calling.
It is the same everywhere. When people say, "Oh well what can one person do", I say, "There are 50,000 "one persons". If you all wrote to your elected politician on a daily basis, imagine his reaction.However I am so disillusioned with my fellow shoppers that I really don't think anything will change. Too many act like sheep: "Oh, well, what can you do? That's the way things are!" This saddens me, there's simply too little resistance to a free enterprise system that's gotten more greedy than tolerable over the years.
"It is worth noting that the concentration of wealth among the top 1% of the population does not necessarily indicate that the country is in a deep depression." Well now you are just changing your original comment. I never said that.
Any country can alter the inequality by flooding their country with millions of poor people or attracting successful people.
The US has free open borders for the world to send us as many people they want, even help them to get to the border. In the last 3 years millions of people are streaming across our border. That would surely increase the inequality.
Is that what we are trying to achieve as a country? A race to the bottom? Where we punish successful people? If that is the case, we are doing a great job in the race to the bottom.
Any point you make using Finland, Norway, etc. as a model is false. Those countries do not let millions of people in with open borders. They do not let in criminals, rapists, terrorist groups like the US does. Countries are emptying their jails and sending them to the US border. You think Norway and Finland and Sweden are doing that? No.
Its no wonder successful people are leaving the country.
No need to go back and forth when your basic premise is we need to punish successful people. The problem we have in this country is people want handouts, not work. Terrorists organizations are coming here and getting free housing, free food, free medical, cell phones, etc. Is that what we want?
Satellite or StreamingIf you don't like your cable company where do you take your business?