TV Host Rants against extreme Islamists and the lack of Action from the white House

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
WhatInThe said:
???

Syracuse Nevada?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megyn_Kelly
Click to expand...

From Rapid City (her hometown) news:

"Lahren didn't want to leave Rapid City but to go into political commentary she would have to expand her horizons.

She chose University of Nevada, Las Vegas and became a panelist and then host on the UNLV political roundtable show called “The Scramble.” On the show, students discuss the issues of the day."
 
AZ Jim said:
Hahahahahahaha happy hunting.
Click to expand...

They do exist on FOX NEWS. Just need to find their names and post them, just for you. Hoping to catch you with your eyes open for a change.

FOX NEWS is probably one of the best cross party stations. Something that is really good for all the TV news groups to do. Any folks or stations that just love to present hate towards the non Democrat ideas are not good presenters of news and opinions. Soon have a new government and either party will be better than what we have these days.
 
BobF said:
They do exist on FOX NEWS. Just need to find their names and post them, just for you. Hoping to catch you with your eyes open for a change.

FOX NEWS is probably one of the best cross party stations. Something that is really good for all the TV news groups to do. Any folks or stations that just love to present hate towards the non Democrat ideas are not good presenters of news and opinions. Soon have a new government and either party will be better than what we have these days.
Click to expand...

Yeah Bob, you do that......I'm waiting. *tapping foot, hands on hips, big smile on face*
 
I have already posted two names and they both do shows of their own, so I have proved my comment about both parties working for FOX NEWS. No need for you to continue your nasty attitude. There are more for sure that are liberals in their voting ways, but maybe just not a big deal made at FOX NEWS as they are really pretty much in the line of telling news regardless, not checking left or right.
 
BobF said:
I have already posted two names and they both do shows of their own, so I have proved my comment about both parties working for FOX NEWS. No need for you to continue your nasty attitude. There are more for sure that are liberals in their voting ways, but maybe just not a big deal made at FOX NEWS as they are really pretty much in the line of telling news regardless, not checking left or right.
Click to expand...

Translation: I am full of it and have been found out.
 
AZ Jim said:
It is so easy for a 22 year old little blonde to garner attention by running her mouth on a subject that is far more complex than she could ever fathom. Faux "news" is a huge joke and only serves to keep the ill-informed stirred up. She and her mother ship (Faux) should be ashamed.
Click to expand...

This 20 year old you complain about does not work for FOX NEWS as you incorrectly state. If folks actually counter all your errors the number would be quite large.

Tomi Lahren works for One America News.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomi_Lahren
 
She aspires to work for faux. In any event my comments about her being totally unqualified to make the statements she makes, stands. Bob, you of all people should never suggest anyone makes erroneous statements, without out them, your comments would be nil.
 
QuickSilver said:
Fox should hire some doctorate prepared commentators like Rachael Maddow.. Now that is ONE smart cookie... Makes the bloviating blonde look like a fool..
Click to expand...

Rachael Maddow! I would love to see her and [your choice of mouthy right-winger] go toe to toe in a live political debate. It would be mere child's play for her; the opponent wouldn't fare well.
 
AZ Jim said:
She aspires to work for faux. In any event my comments about her being totally unqualified to make the statements she makes, stands. Bob, you of all people should never suggest anyone makes erroneous statements, without out them, your comments would be nil.
Click to expand...

Jim, I wonder really what you are intending to say as most of your comments are one sided and not at all true or real.
 
tnthomas said:
Rachael Maddow! I would love to see her and [your choice of mouthy right-winger] go toe to toe in a live political debate. It would be mere child's play for her; the opponent wouldn't fare well.
Click to expand...

If she is so great, then why has she had fallen followers for the last several years? She is good for the far left folks but still not bringing MSNBC up much at all compared to FOX NEWS.
 
QuickSilver said:
What can I say.... lots of Americans are stupid and believe what FOX says.. Lots are racist and LOVE any attack on President Obama they can hear.. FOX provides this..
Click to expand...

It's just wonderful that you are so blessed with the intellect and understanding to make such a comment about your so called STUPID AND Racist FELLOW AMERICANS.
 
BobF said:
If she is so great, then why has she had fallen followers for the last several years? She is good for the far left folks but still not bringing MSNBC up much at all compared to FOX NEWS.
Click to expand...


I have no knowledge of the dynamics involved affecting respective ratings of MSNBC and FOX news, but instead am making a personal observation and expressing a personal opinion as to Rachael Maddow's intellect, grasp of the political scene, and her skill in verbally sifting and separating fact from Bull$h!t.
 
Jackie22 said:
I agree with this comment......

"When vacuous blondes like this gal and Mr trump with zero military experience between them think that sending ground troops in to another unwinnable war is a no brainer it truly is a NO BRAINER!"
Click to expand...

I have no axe to grind in this debate. My first thought was that this young woman looks like a Barbie Doll, and she does, but she is not dumb. I also wondered whether she was reading from a script, but her answers in the interview were spontaneous and spoken with conviction. The political slant of Fox news did not go unnoticed but I'm sure this was not their most extreme effort. Far from it.

My very first thought though was to search for a rant by Adam Hills on the BBC show "The Last Leg" where he decided to start a campaign of mockery against ISIS after they burned a Jordanian pilot alive. It's very rude so don't go there if you don't like that kind of comedy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajmvqRd6DzE
 
tnthomas said:
I have no knowledge of the dynamics involved affecting respective ratings of MSNBC and FOX news, but instead am making a personal observation and expressing a personal opinion as to Rachael Maddow's intellect, grasp of the political scene, and her skill in verbally sifting and separating fact from Bull$h!t.
Click to expand...

That becomes a near impossible job from both sides of observation. It is only valid for the one making the decision.
 
tnthomas said:
I have no knowledge of the dynamics involved affecting respective ratings of MSNBC and FOX news, but instead am making a personal observation and expressing a personal opinion as to Rachael Maddow's intellect, grasp of the political scene, and her skill in verbally sifting and separating fact from Bull$h!t.
Click to expand...

Amen to that.. I love to listen to Rachael.. she sets up the scenario and explains the history behind it and gives lots of backstory.. which is really involved.. and usually will bring out a pertinent guest and ALWAYS asks that guest if she got anything wrong in her explanation.. She is a joy to listen too. Unfortunately, it requires some intellect and an attention span longer than a flea to appreciate and follow Rachael's presentations. It's not just a lot of anger, bashing and fear mongering like FOX..
 
Last edited:
QuickSilver said:
Amen to that.. I love to listen to Rachael.. she sets up the scenario and explains the history behind it and gives lots of backstory.. which is really involved.. and usually will bring out a pertinent guest and ALWAYS asks that guest if she got anything wrong in her explanation.. She is a joy to listen too. Unfortunately, it requires some intellect and an attention span longer than a flea to appreciate and follow Rachael's presentations. It's not just a lot of anger, bashing and fear mongering like FOX..
Click to expand...

Yes, she is truly a "breath of fresh air" amid the ocean of hot air in today's political discourse.
 
Something to wonder about. If Rachael is so great, why isn't MSNBC gaining in popularity? Maybe her topic is not so popular as some wish it were. So therein lies the truth. Maybe? Something to consider.
 
BobF said:
Something to wonder about. If Rachael is so great, why isn't MSNBC gaining in popularity? Maybe her topic is not so popular as some wish it were. So therein lies the truth. Maybe? Something to consider.
Click to expand...

Hahahaha... I think I explained that in my last post.. It requires people to pay attention and to follow her intellect.. It's a lot easier to watch FOX BS ranting and raving than it is to listen to Rachael and LEARN something. Unfortunately... it's EASIER to watch FOX and stay angry. Lots of people like the easy way.
 
QuickSilver said:
Hahahaha... I think I explained that in my last post.. It requires people to pay attention and to follow her intellect.. It's a lot easier to watch FOX BS ranting and raving than it is to listen to Rachael and LEARN something. Unfortunately... it's EASIER to watch FOX and stay angry. Lots of people like the easy way.
Click to expand...

Nice try but useless answer to my question. You are saying all but a few of the people of the US are idiots. What is your measure and why. Speed of listening is not a good measure. Ability to understand is more a measure against the speaker than the listener.

The answer must be that most people prefer more general and broader news rather than the one sided and hateful stuff some folks really like. She is not winning the listening race, so she is not producing like she should. I wonder when MSNBC will cut her down, or off. MSNBC needs more following or they can not keep going. This point has been brought up in the past and questioned the wisdom of keeping Rachel at all.
 
QuickSilver, your posts are nothing to read so what do I leave?

Here is something to read about Rachel and her not caring about your hero. Maybe Obama is not the hero you should be following.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow

[h=2]Political views[/h] Distinguishing herself from others on the left, Maddow said she's a "national security liberal" and in a different interview that she's not "a partisan."[SUP][54][/SUP][SUP][55][/SUP] The New York Times called her a "defense policy wonk"[SUP][42][/SUP][SUP][54][/SUP] and Maddow has written Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power (2012), a book on the role of the military in postwar American politics. During the 2008 presidential election, Maddow did not formally support any candidate. Concerning Barack Obama's candidacy, Maddow said during the primaries, "I have never and still don't think of myself as an Obama supporter, either professionally or actually."[SUP][56][/SUP]
 
Speaking as a Canadian bystander with no political axe to grind, it seems to me that whether or not one agrees with any or all of Ms Maddow's opinions, she obviously is an intelligent, highly educated, well informed, and ethical journalist. These qualities should be respected in today's media free-for-all.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top