I think there’s a false choice in how belief is often framed by non-believers, as if faith and logic are mutually exclusive. They’re not the same tool, but they can work together.
Logic, science, and empirical thinking are about mechanisms ... the how. Faith asks about meaning ... the why. Science can show us how the heart pumps blood, how neural activity corresponds to thought, even how life evolved. But it doesn’t tell us why beauty moves us, or why love feels like purpose, or why we hunger for meaning at all. Those questions don’t fit neatly into empirical measurement, but that doesn’t make them unreal.
As someone noted, religion has been abused. It has been abused for power, for control, for empire. But that’s not unique to faith. That’s human nature expressing itself through whatever structure gives it leverage. The misuse of something doesn’t erase the truth it might hold. You can’t judge medicine by quackery, or science by the atom bomb, or love by the worst marriages.
As for “blind faith”, that phrase gets tossed around, but genuine faith isn’t blindness. It’s a willingness to trust in something beyond immediate proof after weighing the evidence of conscience, experience, and history. It’s not irrational, it’s transrational. It's stepping beyond the limits of reason, not against it.
Take “original sin”, not as a literal stain on newborns, but as a poetic way to say that human nature is inherently flawed, self-centered, prone to break what it touches. You don’t have to believe in Eden to see that truth lived out every day.
A statistic mentions 18,000 gods. True, humanity has always reached toward something greater. That alone says something about us. The hunger for transcendence seems universal, even if the expressions vary. Maybe that points not to illusion, but to a built-in longing for what’s real, like thirst points to water and all the iterations of refreshment and hydration.
And yes, there’s mystery. But mystery doesn’t mean nonsense. The universe itself is mysterious. Quantum mechanics, consciousness, existence itself. Faith simply says, maybe the mystery is personal. Maybe it speaks.
“I think there becomes a point where any kind of logical argument becomes mute.” I agree, not because faith rejects logic, but because logic alone can’t touch certain truths. Love can’t be proven, but we build our lives on it. Meaning can’t be weighed, but we need it to live.
So maybe faith isn’t an escape from logic, it’s what begins where logic ends.