Grumpy Ol' Man
Senior Member
- Location
- Kansas, U.S.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/03/us/illinois-school-district-transgender-ruling/index.html
"Stealing" Jim's thread title... A high school student in Illinois is "transgendering". The student was born male, but is transgendering to live the rest of his/her life as a female. The student is on hormone therapy to 'enhance' certain female attributes, but has not had surgery. Hence, the student still has male "body parts below the waist".
The student has been allowed to participate in sports on the female teams. The student has been allowed access to the girls' locker room. The school put up curtains and required the student to shower/dress/undress behind those curtains. The student sued, saying his/her civil rights were being violated by singling him/her out and requiring different conditions than expected of the other female athletes.
The court ruled in his/her favor. The school must remove the curtains and allow the transgender teen to openly shower/dress/undress with the rest of the team members in the girls' locker room.
My thoughts...
1.) Being allowed to participate in sports as the gender she is transitioning to indicates the willingness of the school to accommodate. Is not moving forward with a civil suit to remove curtains bringing negative attention to the "cause" of those who wish to transgender?
2.) If you had a daughter in the same school, participating in the same sports, would you still allow her to do so knowing someone with full male "equipment" was showering openly with her?
3.) Do the youth of today see enough male/female nudity in movies and on television... and on their computers... that most will think nothing of showering with someone of opposite "equipment"?
If you were sitting on the court which adjudicated this civil filing, would you have voted to remove the curtains or leave them in place?
"Stealing" Jim's thread title... A high school student in Illinois is "transgendering". The student was born male, but is transgendering to live the rest of his/her life as a female. The student is on hormone therapy to 'enhance' certain female attributes, but has not had surgery. Hence, the student still has male "body parts below the waist".
The student has been allowed to participate in sports on the female teams. The student has been allowed access to the girls' locker room. The school put up curtains and required the student to shower/dress/undress behind those curtains. The student sued, saying his/her civil rights were being violated by singling him/her out and requiring different conditions than expected of the other female athletes.
The court ruled in his/her favor. The school must remove the curtains and allow the transgender teen to openly shower/dress/undress with the rest of the team members in the girls' locker room.
My thoughts...
1.) Being allowed to participate in sports as the gender she is transitioning to indicates the willingness of the school to accommodate. Is not moving forward with a civil suit to remove curtains bringing negative attention to the "cause" of those who wish to transgender?
2.) If you had a daughter in the same school, participating in the same sports, would you still allow her to do so knowing someone with full male "equipment" was showering openly with her?
3.) Do the youth of today see enough male/female nudity in movies and on television... and on their computers... that most will think nothing of showering with someone of opposite "equipment"?
If you were sitting on the court which adjudicated this civil filing, would you have voted to remove the curtains or leave them in place?