I speak MY truth

OldFeller said:
It's one more way of indoctrinating of the youth with a mindset of non-cooperation that is part of the socialist undermining of the long established mores of the United States.
Click to expand...
As a non American, I ask sincerely - who or what is indoctrinating the youth of America ?
There must be a plethora of groups seeking to bend the minds of the young, not all of them malignant.

Non-cooperation is a necessary reaction to manipulation of the mind. Resistance is not always futile.
 
Per AI:

Actress Lili Reinhart is known for her role as Betty Cooper in the television series Riverdale.
  • She is recognized for her roles in various films and television productions since rising to fame.
  • Reinhart frequently shares updates and personal style looks with her fans on social media platforms.
  • She has collaborated with brands such as CoverGirl, often showcasing specific products like their lip color collections
 
MACKTEXAS said:
Per AI:

Actress Lili Reinhart is known for her role as Betty Cooper in the television series Riverdale.
  • She is recognized for her roles in various films and television productions since rising to fame.
  • Reinhart frequently shares updates and personal style looks with her fans on social media platforms.
  • She has collaborated with brands such as CoverGirl, often showcasing specific products like their lip color collections
Click to expand...
All I did was take the picture from here and put it in Google Images.
 
MACKTEXAS said:
I'm trying to follow this, due to the amendments you made.

In pure mathematics, 2 + 2 = 4, and when stated exactly that way with no quantifiers it remains an absolute truth because it exists within a closed system of logic.

Once you add quantifiers, you move from that system of logic to the physical world, where several things become abstract.

Also, physical addition doesn't always mirror mathematical addition. If you add 2 piles of sand to 2 other piles of sand, you often just end up with 1 large pile of sand.
Click to expand...
In order to understand the world, I realize that we have to start somewhere by conceding that something is true. But what?
You have provided the rules around 2+2=4 but how can I verify them? Especially with only words to communicate with?
People are sure of themselves today, but knowledge is about probabilities not facts, in my opinion.
 
gruntlabor said:
In order to understand the world, I realize that we have to start somewhere by conceding that something is true. But what?
You have provided the rules around 2+2=4 but how can I verify them? Especially with only words to communicate with?
People are sure of themselves today, but knowledge is about probabilities not facts, in my opinion.
Click to expand...
So you're saying there is nothing we can verify? Sorry my friend, you're surely joking.

How can you verify them? Well, AI says this:

"At its core, \(2 + 2 = 4\) is proven by abstracting everyday counting into rigid logical rules called "axioms". Philosophically, it represents the consistency of our numeric systems, but it is formally verified through deductive logic in set theory and symbolic mathematics."

So hey, if that's helpful, great, if not, sorry . . . I can only tell you that I accepted the obvious when I learned how to count at an early age. :ROFLMAO:

And we cannot prove the sun was shining today?

We can't prove there's a moon after all the money we spent going there?

Wow, we're in bad shape, aren't we? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
MACKTEXAS said:
So you're saying there is nothing we can verify? Sorry my friend, you're surely joking.

How can you verify them? Well, AI says this:

"At its core, \(2 + 2 = 4\) is proven by abstracting everyday counting into rigid logical rules called "axioms". Philosophically, it represents the consistency of our numeric systems, but it is formally verified through deductive logic in set theory and symbolic mathematics."

So hey, if that's helpful, great, if not, sorry . . . I can only tell you that I accepted the obvious when I learned how to count at an early age. :ROFLMAO:

And we cannot prove the sun was shining today?

We can't prove there's a moon after all the money we spent going there?

Wow, we're in bad shape, aren't we? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Those things are almost certainly true. That's where probability comes into play.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top