Where do we deport Sharia infused immigrants?

Lon

Well-known Member
How about humanely putting them on large container ships and cruising them to one of the many very habitable islands in the South Pacific, like a few in the TONGA CHAIN of islands of which I have been on a few. They would have food & shelter and most importantly, they could practice and obey SHAIRA LAW till their hearts content.
 

How about humanely putting them on large container ships and cruising them to one of the many very habitable islands in the South Pacific, like a few in the TONGA CHAIN of islands of which I have been on a few. They would have food & shelter and most importantly, they could practice and obey SHAIRA LAW till their hearts content.

How do you determine who are sharia infused, and who are not, before banishing them like lepers? Once determined, do you keep "them" imprisoned, kids and all? Frankly, I am far more terrified of the effects of your white privilege infused

righteousness, than any threat of immigrant based terrorism. Trading in one's humanity for supposed security? No thank you. Monstrous.
 
I agree Shalimar, furthermore, the Lon seems to be losing it and displaying some cognitive mishmash.
 

I dunno, my Dad began life as an across the board Republican. Later in life maybe his 60's to late 80's he became amazingly liberal. So much so that my brother, the draft card burning hippie turned Archie Bunker, would argue with him. Hearing my Dad say " Oh you simply can't be so narrow minded" was surreal indeed. Now well into his nineties and a bunch of medications he's changed yet again.

I'm sorry to say I'll cut the phone conversation short when he goes on a tangent. Something like " Well don't you think all these foreigners who come to America should start being Americans or they should send them back? I mean they want to be here so make them learn..." Yeah Dad, oh you know I think the dogs caught something in the yard...I gotta go but I'll call you over the weekend...love ya
 
How do you determine who are sharia infused, and who are not, before banishing them like lepers? Once determined, do you keep "them" imprisoned, kids and all? Frankly, I am far more terrified of the effects of your white privilege infused

righteousness, than any threat of immigrant based terrorism. Trading in one's humanity for supposed security? No thank you. Monstrous.

Totally agree!
 
While Lon's post was a bit extreme - and I believe done with the tongue firmly placed against his cheek - the introduction of Canon law was even more extreme.

Think of it this way - who cares what religion or religious laws an individual follows? However, when one's religious dictates are at odds with the principles expressed in our Constitution, that represents a problem.

How does Canon law conflict with the Constitution?
 
The point is... Do we now institute a "religious test" HERE? In America? A person can believe ones religious teachings are correct and still follow the laws of our country. Many things in the Bible would not be allowed today... Stoning come to mind.
 
While Lon's post was a bit extreme - and I believe done with the tongue firmly placed against his cheek - the introduction of Canon law was even more extreme.

Think of it this way - who cares what religion or religious laws an individual follows? However, when one's religious dictates are at odds with the principles expressed in our Constitution, that represents a problem.

How does Canon law conflict with the Constitution?

It doesn't because religious codes cannot be supported against the law of the land. However, the sacred seal of the confessional does seem to enjoy special privilege.

In general a Catholic may consult a priest for advice on moral issues, just as a Muslim may consult the iman for a ruling or an orthodox Jew may defer to his rabbi. Sharia law does not bind nonmuslims just a Canon law has no authority over the general population.

There is no reason to be afraid of the special codes of any religious group unless there is non compliance with state laws. When this happens prosecution is the remedy, not mass deportations.
 
I dunno, my Dad began life as an across the board Republican. Later in life maybe his 60's to late 80's he became amazingly liberal. So much so that my brother, the draft card burning hippie turned Archie Bunker, would argue with him. Hearing my Dad say " Oh you simply can't be so narrow minded" was surreal indeed. Now well into his nineties and a bunch of medications he's changed yet again.

I'm sorry to say I'll cut the phone conversation short when he goes on a tangent. Something like " Well don't you think all these foreigners who come to America should start being Americans or they should send them back? I mean they want to be here so make them learn..." Yeah Dad, oh you know I think the dogs caught something in the yard...I gotta go but I'll call you over the weekend...love ya

...this reminds me of some of my relatives.
 
Shalimar says to Lon -- I am far more terrified of the effects of your white privilege infused

righteousness,

Interesting that Shali would respond this way to my post. What she is inferring pisses me off, particularly when she is responding to a guy that grew up in a multi cultural, multi ethnic environment and has multi racial family members.
 
It doesn't because religious codes cannot be supported against the law of the land. However, the sacred seal of the confessional does seem to enjoy special privilege.

In general a Catholic may consult a priest for advice on moral issues, just as a Muslim may consult the iman for a ruling or an orthodox Jew may defer to his rabbi. Sharia law does not bind nonmuslims just a Canon law has no authority over the general population.


There is no reason to be afraid of the special codes of any religious group unless there is non compliance with state laws. When this happens prosecution is the remedy, not mass deportations.

There is no problem as long as civil law is accepted over Sharia law.
 
Shalimar says to Lon -- I am far more terrified of the effects of your white privilege infused

righteousness,

Interesting that Shali would respond this way to my post. What she is inferring pisses me off, particularly when she is responding to a guy that grew up in a multi cultural, multi ethnic environment and has multi racial family members.

I'll bet your multicultural family has no Muslims.
 
Shalimar says to Lon -- I am far more terrified of the effects of your white privilege infused

righteousness,

Interesting that Shali would respond this way to my post. What she is inferring pisses me off, particularly when she is responding to a guy that grew up in a multi cultural, multi ethnic environment and has multi racial family members.

However, you are white... and with that comes "white privilege". I'm absolutely certain you will deny that that exists... in fact most of us don't see it.. but it's a real thing. You have had it all your life Lon... All of us have.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_privilege

White privilege
(or white skin privilege) is a term for societal privileges that benefit people identified as white in Western countries, beyond what is commonly experienced by non-white people under the same social, political, or economic circumstances. Academic perspectives such as critical race theory and whiteness studies use the concept of "white privilege" to analyze how racism and racialized societies affect the lives of white or white-skinned people.

According to Peggy McIntosh, whites in Western societies enjoy advantages that non-whites do not experience, as "an invisible package of unearned assets".[SUP][1][/SUP] White privilege denotes both obvious and less obvious passive advantages that white people may not recognize they have, which distinguishes it from overt bias or prejudice. These include cultural affirmations of one's own worth; presumed greater social status; and freedom to move, buy, work, play, and speak freely. The effects can be seen in professional, educational, and personal contexts. The concept of white privilege also implies the right to assume the universality of one's own experiences, marking others as different or exceptional while perceiving oneself as normal.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3]
[/SUP]
 
Shalimar says to Lon -- I am far more terrified of the effects of your white privilege infused

righteousness,

Interesting that Shali would respond this way to my post. What she is inferring pisses me off, particularly when she is responding to a guy that grew up in a multi cultural, multi ethnic environment and has multi racial family members.

That's a bit like saying male privilege does not exist because one grew up surrounded by women.
 
That's a bit like saying male privilege does not exist because one grew up surrounded by women.

I think Lon is making the common mistake of believing "white privilege" means White people don't have to work for what they have.
 


Back
Top