Are we still allowed to discuss female logic, (if so then there are a few things to say)?

Paladin1950 said:
I noticed that no female member has started a thread about male logic. Then again, I have been told in the past that we men have no logic. 😄😃
Click to expand...
I suppose an argument to explain why no woman here has started such a thread, could be that women are too logical to sling such a stereotypical whitewash against such a large segment of humanity. On the other hand, maybe women just have better social skills.

Of course, my above comment is just as illogical as the claim in the opening post, where no actual data had been presented, but relied entirely on the opinion, predisposition, and ulterior motives of the claimant. In truth, both men and women vary widely in their ability to apply logic or interact with others. There are few helpful stereotypes, if any at all, that apply to either group.
 
JustDave said:
I suppose an argument to explain why no woman here has started such a thread, could be that women are too logical to sling such a stereotypical whitewash against such a large segment of humanity. On the other hand, maybe women just have better social skills.
Of course, my above comment is just as illogical as the claim in the opening post, where no actual data had been presented, but relied entirely on the opinion, predisposition, and ulterior motives of the claimant. In truth, both men and women vary widely in their ability to apply logic or interact with others. There are few helpful stereotypes, if any at all, that apply to either group.
Click to expand...
Try telling all that to my dear old boss, and I'm afraid you would soon have been tied in knots, (a guy married three times, brought up three families, and managed very successful business he set up himself>

Unfortunately he's no longer with us, but he did give me one further piece of advice, and that was "Never argue with a fool, as no one will know who the fool is if you do", (now either of us can go away thinking the other is a fool cant we, and no harm done as we've nothing to lose by doing so, and hopefully we can both try to follow that sage piece of advice better in the future).
 
Nemo2 said:
Then again, if we acknowledge that the whole thing is a 'put on' we can.........
Click to expand...
........we can "one up" the original premise with and twice as biting comeback (Pepper), refuse to play at all (all those who have not risen to the bait), or become pedantic bores (like me).
 
grahamg said:
Try telling all that to my dear old boss, and I'm afraid you would soon have been tied in knots, (a guy married three times, brought up three families, and managed very successful business he set up himself>
Click to expand...
Good for him, although mostly irrelevant.
grahamg said:
Unfortunately he's no longer with us, but he did give me one further piece of advice, and that was "Never argue with a fool, as no one will know who the fool is if you do", (now either of us can go away thinking the other is a fool cant we, and no harm done as we've nothing to lose by doing so, and hopefully we can both try to follow that sage piece of advice better in the future).
Click to expand...
You are starting catch on, but you still have a long way to go.
 
JustDave said:
Good for him, although mostly irrelevant.

You are starting catch on, but you still have a long way to go.
Click to expand...
Graham seems to have been given a lot of advice during his lifetime, most of it probably irrelevant but, I do admire Graham's tenacity and the way he posts regardless of the fact that he undoubtedly knows the responses he will get ... maybe that's his point? :unsure::)
 
Trish said:
Graham seems to have been given a lot of advice during his lifetime, most of it probably irrelevant but, I do admire Graham's tenacity and the way he posts regardless of the fact that he undoubtedly knows the responses he will get ... maybe that's his point? :unsure::)
Click to expand...
Yeah, (and "attention",..., who likes to be ignored after all :) ).
 
JustDave said:
Good for him, although mostly irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Not the sort of guy you'd have thought irrelevant if you met him, he'd got the respect of better men than I, (and who knows how you would have measured up to his scrutiny).
JustDave said:
You are starting catch on, but you still have a long way to go.
Click to expand...
You think I'm catching on to whatever you might wish me to think, or say.

Mmmmm, oh well,...! :censored::cautious:🤫
 
Last edited:
JustDave said:
Well, maybe you are not catching on. That would certainly explain a lot.
Click to expand...
You're not the same Dave I came across twenty years ago on a forum mostly used by single parents in the UK are you, (no cant be, he was a handsome devil :sneaky:)?
He took it upon himself to interpret things I say in ways it was hard to credit too, (for example suggesting my pointing out opinions expressed in a government sponsored, and Oxford University sanction document, meant he was being accused of something unspeakable).
 
Paladin1950 said:
I noticed that no female member has started a thread about male logic. Then again, I have been told in the past that we men have no logic. 😄😃
Click to expand...
Sorry I missed your post earlier, and yea/no, there most probably hasn't been a thread on "male logic", nor even if we've none at all, (quite a feat in itself I'd have thought, to live a totally illogical, topsy turvy life!).

Anyway, I'm too busy to do so, things to sort out, (maybe even a wedding in the offing if I can come to a satisfactory conclusion one way or tother! :whistle::cautious::sneaky:).
 
grahamg said:
Sorry I missed your post earlier, and yea/no, there most probably hasn't been a thread on "male logic", nor even if we've none at all, (quite a feat in itself I'd have thought, to live a totally illogical, topsy turvy life!).

Anyway, I'm too busy to do so, things to sort out, (maybe even a wedding in the offing if I can come to a satisfactory conclusion one way or tother! :whistle::cautious::sneaky:).
Click to expand...
Well, don't hang around Graham, the lucky lady probably has other offers to consider!
 
grahamg said:
He took it upon himself to interpret things I say in ways it was hard to credit too, (for example suggesting my pointing out opinions expressed in a government sponsored, and Oxford University sanction document, meant he was being accused of something unspeakable)
Click to expand...
Oh you poor man. People misinterpreting what you say. They must be out to get a poor innocent like you, when the last thing you want to do is stir up trouble. <cough, cough>
grahamg said:
You're not the same Dave I came across twenty years ago on a forum mostly used by single parents in the UK are you, (no cant be, he was a handsome devil :sneaky:)?
Click to expand...
Don't know who that was, and don't care, but nice prattling deflection.

Word for the day: passive aggression
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top