Are we still allowed to discuss female logic, (if so then there are a few things to say)?

JustDave said:
Oh you poor man. People misinterpreting what you say. They must be out to get a poor innocent like you, when the last thing you want to do is stir up trouble. <cough, cough>

Don't know who that was, and don't care, but nice prattling deflection.

Word for the day: passive aggression
Click to expand...
We're not arguing now are we(?), (passive aggressively or no), or else there will be no doubt whatsoever that a couple of fools are wasting theirs and everyone else's time here.
 

grahamg said:
She could just you're right, (especially if she offers nuptials at the drop of a hat :whistle::rolleyes::sneaky: !).
Click to expand...
Yep. Good point. You better watch your step, no telling how many forum hearts are about to be broken and, let's face it, you're in enough trouble here as it is!;) :)
 
Trish said:
Yep. Good point. You better watch your step, no telling how many forum hearts are about to be broken and, let's face it, you're in enough trouble here as it is!;) :)
Click to expand...
Trouble moi? :(

Perish the thought, only with someone I thought I'd come across twenty years ago, but turns out its not that Dave, (on the other hand Dave may be "Just" a forum name, as you could say is implied?).

Wait a minute, wait a minute, if he's no Dave, then maybe he's the bloke my wife went off with, and I've never had chance to thank him, (well its hard to thank him enough isn't it, but again no, he was a handsome devil too!). :)
 
Nathan said:
Just as soon as I saw the thread title I instantly knew of the author(grahamg!).

You are the only guy I know who actually enjoys shooting himself in the foot. :p That's OK, just don't get the rest of us guys shot! :eek:
Click to expand...
You do know me too well obviously, but on a serious note you're not suggesting the other brave men on this forum fear discussing such a topic as laid out in the OP, (surely not? :( ).

(My foot still seems intact BTW) :)
 
grahamg said:
Am putting the knees away again, "its all off",(thought I'd better let the only invited guest know asap!).
Click to expand...
I am deeply disappointed to read this Graham. I expected at least a noble speech about decoupling, how you wish each other the absolute best and will cherish the memories etc, accompanied by numerous mentions of friends and colleagues, past and present, who have passed on their words of wisdom to you, words which can never be questioned as the giver was beyond doubt plus, of course, half a dozen links to various sites but, instead, look what you give us, barely a sentence! :cry:

I am sorry to use outdoor language here laddie but, you are nowt but a cad! :cool:


No offence intended! ;):ROFLMAO:
 
Trish said:
I am deeply disappointed to read this Graham. I expected at least a noble speech about decoupling, how you wish each other the absolute best and will cherish the memories etc, accompanied by numerous mentions of friends and colleagues, past and present, who have passed on their words of wisdom to you, words which can never be questioned as the giver was beyond doubt plus, of course, half a dozen links to various sites but, instead, look what you give us, barely a sentence! :cry:
I am sorry to use outdoor language here laddie but, you are nowt but a cad! :cool:
No offence intended! ;):ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Good though she didn't seem to offended by my "breach of promise" did she, (cant recall ever agreeing to it in any case though).
Loved the leg pulling!!!!!!!!
 
grahamg said:
Good though she didn't seem to offended by my "breach of promise" did she, (cant recall ever agreeing to it in any case though).
Loved the leg pulling!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
No worries. I am of course just teasing but some folk can be very sensitive. Thanks for taking it in the spirit it's meant :) (y)
 
Trish said:
No worries. I am of course just teasing but some folk can be very sensitive. Thanks for taking it in the spirit it's meant :) (y)
Click to expand...
Are we done, or could a "noble speech" be worth conjuring up to encapusalate the feeling of utter devastation at our decoupling incident as witnessed on the thread? :(

I'm in grieving as you can imagine, but struggled on through the Christmas meal I felt obliged to attend in Chester, UK with the greatest amount of stoicism possible! The thought occurs i should do as my father did when struggling with the devastation of being unable to visit his future bride, and got someone else to pen the love letter he sent! :)

Could you help me out here, and tell the whole world how much I love you all, and will be thinking of you all as I cope with my grief, (lay it on really thick won't you!!).
 
Back to "Fuzzy logic", (now its been raised on the thread it would be worth trying to understand it a little better):

Fuzzy Logic
"The sliding scale principle may be seen as a manifestation of fuzzy logic, which holds that everything temporal can be a matter of degree.' Under fuzzy logic, zero and one are simply the opposite ends of a continuim. Although some phenomena reflect true dichotomies ("crisp sets"), a great deal of what we can observe falls along a scale between the true extremes or falls in a set with inherently fuzzy boundaries. Thus, what we think of as a full glass (a glass filled to a level just far enough below the rim to prevent spillage in ordinary use) is a ninety percent full glass and a ten percent empty glass. A game won at the expense of an injury to a key player is a game eighty percent won and twenty percent lost."
 
Last edited:
Some "Fuzzy logic" at play here, (as argued by a lawyer):

"I simply emphasised again for there to be some movement in a positive light, sometimes concessions have to be made even not necessarily when one fully accepts there was any wrong. He does not feel that he has done anything wrong or there is anything for him to apologise for. I again suggested that sometimes the ends justify the means"
 
grahamg said:
Some "Fuzzy logic" at play here, (as argued by a lawyer):

"I simply emphasised again for there to be some movement in a positive light, sometimes concessions have to be made even not necessarily when one fully accepts there was any wrong. He does not feel that he has done anything wrong or there is anything for him to apologise for. I again suggested that sometimes the ends justify the means"
Click to expand...
Yeah, nah. That's just waffle.
 
grahamg said:
This video is fun isn't it, (just how scientific I'll leave others to judge, though if the trouble I'm experiencing with one person of the female logic brigade is anything to go by, I'd say the guy in the video, even be he largely a comedian or not, may just be on to something! :) ).
Click to expand...
It definitely makes sense with my husband. :ROFLMAO: I used to ask him all the time what he was thinking about. Now I know and I don't ask anymore. :ROFLMAO: That is funny!
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top