Between Fires And Hurricanes We Are Beung Destroyed & We Are Worried About North Korea?

L

Lon

Well-known Member
Location
Central California
Could the Little Fat One with the Bad Haircut do more damage than what NATURAL DISASTERS are presently doing?
 

The little fat one, as you put it, is doing his bit to augment the intensity and frequency of the natural disasters. So is every leader who listens to vested interests rather than the world's scientists.

climate change is a hoax.jpg
 
Yes, Lon, the little fat one with the bad haircut can do more harm. It's not easy but it is possible to recover from Nature's wrath but recovering from several nuclear blasts around the world would not be possible. Kim Jong Un would launch the first, we would respond with a bigger one or two or ten, Russia would chime in with theirs and then the other powers would join in. The world as we know it would cease to exist.
 
Well, I for one DO believe that nuclear weapons are more dangerous than hurricanes and wildfires, and aside from the obliteration caused by the initial explosions, the effects of radiation can make huge areas uninhabitable almost forever. Look at Chernobyl, which may be inhabitable for more than a thousand years (or maybe only 500, but that difference won't make much difference to most of us).
 
I was wondering the same thing Gary. Can't both the "little fat one" and the natural disasters be terrifying threats at the same time? Do we have to choose one?
 
I think he's just making a sarcastic reference to the fury of our natural disasters lately; that they may seem almost comparable to a nuclear missile because there's so much of it. Of course not, he's just using an exaggeration to make the point.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top