It's interesting to read the reactions by readers of
Roger Cohen's column in today's NY Times.
From a reader in Paris: "An utterly catastrophic decision, one of those rare instances when there is no discernible silver lining to mitigate the disaster.
A sad day for Europe, but a terrible one for the UK -- in particular for the almost-majority who saw this coming, did what they could to avoid it, and will now have to live with the consequences of their fellow citizens' moment of temporary insanity."
Someone commenting on
what this may mean in terms of our election this Fall. "Trump believes the vote to exit the EU was a "great thing." Sarah Palin "welcomed the good news." Chaos and uncertainty and plunging markets are rarely a great thing. The world-wide spread of xenophobia is not good news.
The UK vote would appear to strengthen Trump's chances in November. Trump thrives on fear-mongering and demonization of minorities. His election would be a disaster for the United State and the world. The only "good news" from the vote is that US citizens have been put on notice that a Trump presidency is indeed possible. We must do everything possible to avoid that catastrophe."
From a reader in London: This is a disaster, but it will be a hard lesson to learn for the brexiteers. The reaction from the market is strong but contained as expected. Business and investors are now collectively holding their breath to see what will happen.
Here is my prediction. In the days to come EU leaders will meet and despite the doom and gloom prediction will offer britain a norway style deal to stay in the EEC. The deal will be that we obey freedom of movement and contribute to the EU budget like before.
Boris after much "agonizing" will accept. This will signal a return to the status quo. Scotland may remain in the UK, but that is not certain.
The alternative, which I consider extremely unlikely is that Boris will say no and britain will get no access to the european market at all. This will spark market panic, a scotland exit and a long recession until a new equllibrium on trade is achieved and we settle down to being a lot poorer and with slightly less immigration.
There are other possibilities that I consider politically untenable, such as unilaterally abolishing all Tarrifs, removing all worker protections, reducing the minimum wage, importing cheap labour from the commonwealth and turning ourselves into a mini-china. I am not certain this will work economically, but politically it is all but impossible.
If I was a betting man, I would bet good money on Norway-style.