hearlady
Im now "heartheoldlady"
- Location
- N Carolina
We had a nice long spring this year then it got hot. Real hot.
Thanks @Packerjohn , media may play up issues to alarm the public, that's how they get attention and make money. But, that does a dis-service to the serious concerns of the world.Big storm outside right now but storms come and go. I'm in the middle of Canada and things are still pretty good. However climate change is real.
Of course, many are in denial. They are still flying everywhere for holidays and those monster cruise ships keep getting larger and larger.
We have a lot of silly, small issues in the media but I am very concerned about 2 major issues because they just might be the end of civilization as we have known it. I am talking about:
1. Global Warming - storms, massive migration, starvation, war for food and living space.
2. Nuclear War - Yap! If Sir Putin, the Great doesn't stop or the Chinese Lion wouldn't stop roaring, we are going to be into WWIII. It seems many countries are itching to get into it; including Canada. This is no joke. Too bad the young generation wouldn't learn their history. What they don't like they just topple over the statues because it "upsets them."
Absolutely, and it should come as no surprise. Earth's climate is always changing, its never been stable, why should it be now? The earth has been warming for the last 15,000 years or so, but the rate of warming seems to have increased. And why wouldn't the greenhouse gases we've been emitting not have any effect? Of course they do.climate change is real
No, I remember it well. In about 75 I helped my major professor do some research on it for a paper he was writing. It was on the impact of global cooling and sea level falling on marine fisheries. It is an interesting lesson in how we often get things wrong. I believe we have much better science today and it does clearly show warming, not cooling. But we need to remember the global cooling experience and not let us get to arrogant about what we think is happening...Chic, you're not the only one that remembers the ice age warnings in the 70s but we might be the only two on this forum.
As I recall what Carl Sagan was concerned about was possible cooling associated with a nuclear winter. He believed that a nuclear war would generate enough particulates in the atmosphere to shade and cool the earth. He may have been right, but fortunately no nuclear war, so far... A few years later he concerned that the Kuwait oil fires set by Saddam Hussein's army would do something similar, he was wrong about that.Carl Sagan swore up and down in 1978 that we were headed into another ice age.
I'm so glad you weren't directly impacted.Our area got a lot of damaging thunderstorms as well, OED! Very unusual for early July, but thankfully our immediate area escaped them!
Sorry but I have to disagree. When it comes to global warming, data collected and collated from all around the world in a variety of ways - weather stations and satellites - reveals increasing average temperatures of the land, the atmosphere and the sea. The globe is warming because it receives more heat from the sun than it radiates back out into space. Greenhouse gases trap some of the heat from escaping just as a blanket keeps body heat in the bed.Some people who think they are really smart, are not!
Theories are not facts; they are just theories... Global warming is a theory, not a fact.
I agree that the end result is yet to be determined.Do your own research, but the final answer is yet to be determined. So, move on and please stop trying so hard to convince others that you know the answers, as you may not be correct.
You do know that you contradicted yourself on this post and basically made my point that global warming is just a theory, not a proven fact!Sorry but I have to disagree. When it comes to global warming, data collected and collated from all around the world in a variety of ways - weather stations and satellites - reveals increasing average temperatures of the land, the atmosphere and the sea. The globe is warming because it receives more heat from the sun than it radiates back out into space. Greenhouse gases trap some of the heat from escaping just as a blanket keeps body heat in the bed.
I agree that the end result is yet to be determined.
It all depends on whether or not we stop pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Geoffrey Widdison from QuoraYou do know that you contradicted yourself on this post and basically made my point that global warming is just a theory, not a proven fact!
I don't think I know all the facts, I am going by what I experience on a daily basis! Today, for instance, our temperature once again beats an all time record! IOW, it hasn't been this hot on this day since records were started! We also had destructive hurricanes, of a strength never seen before in this area! (Fiona). Then we had all-time, unseasonable, record breaking lows that ruined our grape vines and many fruit trees! Are all those things a part of a natural cycle? I don't know, that's why I call it "climate change" and not "global warming!" And whole heartedly agreed, I am not an expert in anything! The older I get the less I know!Some people who think they are really smart, are not!
Theories are not facts; they are just theories... Global warming is a theory, not a fact.
Do your own research, but the final answer is yet to be determined. So, move on and please stop trying so hard to convince others that you know the answers, as you may not be correct.
Sorry, I can't follow all the scientific data but, judging by the book, are you saying that a planet like ours is exceedingly rare and we have been horrendous stewards of it? And that Global Warming is real and we had better start to listen to science to stop the insanity? Or did I get that wrong?Most ordinary people, don't have the science backgrounds to offer meaningful opinions on a subject like global warming. Instead they glean shallow understanding through terse news and magazine articles or politically and economically motivated pseudo science articles of others with agendas. And if they as those with weak science and math educations, actually bother to try and understand the science even a little bit deeper, it all goes so far over their heads, so they quickly abandon it. Can you read these?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_cycling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_cycle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_cycle
This best seller book from 2000 would be a productive place to start from for those with weak science while also better understanding we Earth monkeys place in the Universe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth:_Why_Complex_Life_Is_Uncommon_in_the_Universe
Just $2 plus shipping used on Amazon books:
https://www.amazon.com/Rare-Earth-Complex-Uncommon-Universe/dp/0387952896
I recall it too, but it never gained enough traction to outdo the science of global warming. It had a feel of someone coming up with an opposite idea on the grounds that someone else posed an idea. Then it morphed, as misinformation often does, into an after effect of global warming, so we could have it both ways. Shortly after that, Hollywood entered with a disaster movie where everything began to freeze and destroy civilization. The timeline for the coming of that ice age in the movie was like 30 days, but that clinched it as a "truth," and some people are still believing it today.No, I remember it well. In about 75 I helped my major professor do some research on it for a paper he was writing. It was on the impact of global cooling and sea level falling on marine fisheries. It is an interesting lesson in how we often get things wrong. I believe we have much better science today and it does clearly show warming, not cooling. But we need to remember the global cooling experience and not let us get to arrogant about what we think is happening...
Myrtle said:
Chic, you're not the only one that remembers the ice age warnings in the 70s but we might be the only two on this forum.
I recall it too, but it never gained enough traction to outdo the science of global warming. It had a feel of someone coming up with an opposite idea on the grounds that someone else posed an idea. Then it morphed, as misinformation often does, into an after effect of global warming, so we could have it both ways. Shortly after that, Hollywood entered with a disaster movie where everything began to freeze and destroy civilization. The timeline for the coming of that ice age in the movie was like 30 days, but that clinched it as a "truth," and some people are still believing it today.
I'm not questioning you. I believe there are those people. I would like to see the links if you want to post them.Here, California a few miles north of San Francisco, we had one of the wettest coldest winters in years — including snow on Mt Tamalpais, the first I have ever seen. Reservoirs overflowing at the end of rainy season, and a cold windy July. Can’t speak for everyone, but that’s “Global Warming” around here. Is a new Ice Age coming? Some think so, and I would be glad to post the links.
Global warming is about as much a fact as science gets.Theories are not facts; they are just theories... Global warming is a theory, not a fact.
https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentar...to-a-new-ice-age-why-is-no-one-doing-anythingI'm not questioning you. I believe there are those people. I would like to see the links if you want to post them.
I remember the 70s and the fear that the earth would be plunged into a dark cold season referred to as Nuclear Winter. The fear was based on the probability of a nuclear war breaking out that would trigger devastating fires all around the planet. The resulting smoke, thrown high above the earth's weather systems would take a very long time to dissipate, effectively staying in low orbit for years.Myrtle said:
Chic, you're not the only one that remembers the ice age warnings in the 70s but we might be the only two on this forum.
I recall it too, but it never gained enough traction to outdo the science of global warming. It had a feel of someone coming up with an opposite idea on the grounds that someone else posed an idea. Then it morphed, as misinformation often does, into an after effect of global warming, so we could have it both ways. Shortly after that, Hollywood entered with a disaster movie where everything began to freeze and destroy civilization. The timeline for the coming of that ice age in the movie was like 30 days, but that clinched it as a "truth," and some people are still believing it today.
We had what I would call a nuclear year in 1981 because in 1980 volcano erupted in my country. So the particles from the eruption blocked the sun's rays and the result was a cold year all year long and extending into the first part of 1982. It had nothing to do with climate change but a natural event ie. volcanic eruption. This was what I lived through. I do remember it well.I remember the 70s and the fear that the earth would be plunged into a dark cold season referred to as Nuclear Winter. The fear was based on the probability of a nuclear war breaking out that would trigger devastating fires all around the planet. The resulting smoke, thrown high above the earth's weather systems would take a very long time to dissipate, effectively staying in low orbit for years.
During that time heat, and even more importantly, sunlight would be blocked from the earth's surface. Without sunlight plants cannot photosynthesise, a process by which they take water from the soil and CO2 from the air to make food molecules that are the baseline of all the food chains.
After that, even if the war and radiation didn't kill us, starvation would probably finish off the rest.
Now that, my friends, is a theory because as yet it hasn't happened.
For people who have not had the same scientific education as others, may I suggest Genesis Ch 1 and 2 in the bible. Ignoring the story about a talking snake, but looking at the message with modern eyes, it tells us the earth is indeed a special place, even a paradise, but the ignorant wilfulness of humanity meant that we have been fundamentally flawed from the very beginning.Sorry, I can't follow all the scientific data but, judging by the book, are you saying that a planet like ours is exceedingly rare and we have been horrendous stewards of it? And that Global Warming is real and we had better start to listen to science to stop the insanity? Or did I get that wrong?
El Castor, thank you for posting those. I appreciate your effort. I will check them out as soon as I get a chance.https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentar...to-a-new-ice-age-why-is-no-one-doing-anything
https://phys.org/news/2015-07-ice-age.html
https://realclimatescience.com/2021/11/new-ice-age-coming/
https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/01/new-study-claims-an-ice-age-is-coming-earths-climate-is-cyclical/
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/...r-minimum-reduced-sunlight-to-the-ice-age.htm
https://harpers.org/archive/1958/09/the-coming-ice-age/