Countdown to the Russian invasion of Ukraine

I always keep in mind, that since the first Bomb in Japan, the world leaders had to realize for the first time, that they could no longer be guaranteed survival in a war. You cannot hide from a nuclear blast! If the Bomb doesn't kill you the fallout will! Putin knows, if he starts a nuclear war, he cannot be assured of his own survival. And he, like most ego leaders, will not risk it!
 

Using nuclear to subdue Ukraine makes no sense. Nuclear fallout carried by winds would cause death in NATO countries. That in turn would call for all out destruction of Russia. The threat is one thing those charged with carrying out that threat surely know what the consequences are.

Is it likely that those with their fingers on the buttons to wipe out themselves & their families are going to follow the direction of one man?
 
If someone were Stupid enough to launch a nuclear attack, Washington and Moscow would be the primary targets....followed closely by places like NYC, LA, London, Paris, etc., etc. Governments would be wiped out, and chaos and millions of deaths would be the result.

Another major danger is a huge cyber attack on the infrastructures. No electricity, no internet, no TV or phone service, etc. Within days, half the populations would go Nuts, and people would be at risk just exiting their house.
 

These are the faces of Evil...

57167891-0-image-m-3_1651164239096.jpg


Ukrainian military officials have pictured and revealed names of Russian soldiers dubbed the 'Despicable Ten' who they accuse of carrying out war crimes in Bucha.

The Ukrainian Ministry of Defence released the names and faces of the men, stating: 'Ten Russian butchers from the 64th brigade have been identified and named suspects responsible for committing the Bucha massacre.

'This unit [has] been awarded for its atrocities, and returned to the battlefield. Justice for war criminals is inevitable.'

Horrific images of dozens of bodies in civilian clothes lying in the streets, some with their hands tied behind their backs, in Bucha and other towns around Kyiv, shocked the world when they emerged earlier this month. There were also reports of mass rapes.

Amid global outrage over the killings, the leader of the 'Butchers of Bucha' Russian brigade was promoted from Lieutenant Colonel to full Colonel last week.

Ukraine Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova said today: 'We will not stop until we bring each of them to justice.'

The Prosecutor General's office and news agency Slidstvo scoured the internet for the personal information of the ten men.

Aged between 24 and 33, the corporals, sergeants and privates in the 64th Motorized Brigade are now thought to be fighting in the Donbas.

More than 400 mutilated, tortured and murdered corpses were discovered in Bucha days after reports emerged of widespread war crimes in the Kyiv suburb as Russian troops withdrew.

Last week alleged ringleader the 'Butcher of Bucha' Commander Azatbek Omurbekov was promoted from Lieutenant Colonel to full Colonel.

It came despite his men standing accused of gang rapes, tortures and civilian executions.

Soon after receiving the honours, the unit was then redeployed to the eastern Donbas front, one of the most dangerous in the conflict.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ls-faces-Russians-accused-Butchers-Bucha.html
 
Timewise 60+ said:
I always keep in mind, that since the first Bomb in Japan, the world leaders had to realize for the first time, that they could no longer be guaranteed survival in a war. You cannot hide from a nuclear blast! If the Bomb doesn't kill you the fallout will! Putin knows, if he starts a nuclear war, he cannot be assured of his own survival. And he, like most ego leaders, will not risk it!
Click to expand...
I'd like to think the same, but if the supposition is correct and Putin is suffering from a terminal illness, will he care if he doesn't survive ?>
 
Vladimir Putin will launch an all-out nuclear war on the West rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, Russia's chief propagandists have declared, in just the latest chilling threat coming from Moscow.

Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster RT and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin pressing the red button is 'more probable' than the idea that he will allow Russia to lose the war.

'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts. I think World War Three is more realistic, knowing us, knowing our leader.

'The most incredible outcome, that all this will end with a nuclear strike, seems more probable to me than the other course of events.

'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'

Simonyan's calm imagining of nuclear holocaust is just the latest threat issued from the top levels of the Russian state, after fellow propagandist Vladimir Solovyov, foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, and Putin himself issued threats in the last 48 hours.

The US and UK have dismissed such rhetoric as bluster but the increasing frequency of the threats coupled with the failures of Russia's military will raise fears that a Cold War-style standoff is now a realistic possibility before the war in Ukraine ends.

It comes after Russia successfully test-launched its latest nuclear missile - Sarmat 2 - last week, with Putin boasting it can strike targets anywhere on earth and cannot be stopped by any current missile defences.

Click here for the video... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-TV-says-nuclear-strike-probable-losing.html
 
hollydolly said:
Vladimir Putin will launch an all-out nuclear war on the West rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, Russia's chief propagandists have declared, in just the latest chilling threat coming from Moscow.

Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster RT and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin pressing the red button is 'more probable' than the idea that he will allow Russia to lose the war.

'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts. I think World War Three is more realistic, knowing us, knowing our leader.

'The most incredible outcome, that all this will end with a nuclear strike, seems more probable to me than the other course of events.

'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'

Simonyan's calm imagining of nuclear holocaust is just the latest threat issued from the top levels of the Russian state, after fellow propagandist Vladimir Solovyov, foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, and Putin himself issued threats in the last 48 hours.

The US and UK have dismissed such rhetoric as bluster but the increasing frequency of the threats coupled with the failures of Russia's military will raise fears that a Cold War-style standoff is now a realistic possibility before the war in Ukraine ends.

It comes after Russia successfully test-launched its latest nuclear missile - Sarmat 2 - last week, with Putin boasting it can strike targets anywhere on earth and cannot be stopped by any current missile defences.

Click here for the video... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-TV-says-nuclear-strike-probable-losing.html
Click to expand...
I just heard on TV that Putin is likely to launch a low level nuke to try to scare the hell out of everyone, but the person talking said he doubts that he would start a full scale nuclear war. In reality, no one knows what’s going on in his mind.
 
oldman said:
I just heard on TV that Putin is likely to launch a low level nuke to try to scare the hell out of everyone, but the person talking said he doubts that he would start a full scale nuclear war. In reality, no one knows what’s going on in his mind.
Click to expand...
Low level high level.. the minute Putin or anyone launches any type of nuclear attack they're going to have several nuclear warheads pointed directly at them...
 
hollydolly said:
What has Christian got to do with truth?
Click to expand...
Dealing with the quote you provided in the original post...see below!

'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'

Therefore, as a probable non-Christian she is lying! = not truthful!
 
hollydolly said:
Low level high level.. the minute Putin or anyone launches any type of nuclear attack they're going to have several nuclear warheads pointed directly at them...
Click to expand...
Putin also made the comment that any country that continues to give aid to Ukraine will be considered their ally and would be open to attack. The guy on TV then said that Putin will not attack another country because he lacks the manpower to do so. I was thinking, yeah, that may be right, but he has a whole arsenal of jets and nukes. Like I already said, I would not take him for granted on doing anything to win at all costs.
 
Knight said:
Using nuclear to subdue Ukraine makes no sense. Nuclear fallout carried by winds would cause death in NATO countries. That in turn would call for all out destruction of Russia. The threat is one thing those charged with carrying out that threat surely know what the consequences are.

Is it likely that those with their fingers on the buttons to wipe out themselves & their families are going to follow the direction of one man?
Click to expand...
Prevailing winds would carry the radiation back into Russia moreso than into NATO countries, so I'm not sure that's a factor, unless Putin waits for a disruption to the jetstream.
 
oldman said:
Putin also made the comment that any country that continues to give aid to Ukraine will be considered their ally and would be open to attack. The guy on TV then said that Putin will not attack another country because he lacks the manpower to do so. I was thinking, yeah, that may be right, but he has a whole arsenal of jets and nukes. Like I already said, I would not take him for granted on doing anything to win at all costs.
Click to expand...
Fortunately, the US has interception missiles already calibrated for anything launched from Russia. I read that the US military is fitting them (or has fit them) with alternative power sources in case we lose our military satellites. And they're doing the same with our naval warships. In fact, they've already fitted and tested two of our largest warships....at least, that's what the article said.
 
Murrmurr said:
Fortunately, the US has interception missiles already calibrated for anything launched from Russia. I read that the US military is fitting them (or has fit them) with alternative power sources in case we lose our military satellites. And they're doing the same with our naval warships. In fact, they've already fitted and tested two of our largest warships....at least, that's what the article said.
Click to expand...
Why would he even consider launching a nuke our way? That would be plain crazy, but then again…………
 
Timewise 60+ said:
Weapons in GB and USA are already pointed straight at them...!
Click to expand...
There are articles out there that dispell so much information that we can’t be sure who has what. Supposedly, Russia has hypersonic missiles that can travel at Mach 6 and reach the U.S. in about 30 minutes. Additionally, they fly very low and have stealth capabilities making it unknown to the U.S. when they are launched.

I suppose we are left to figure it out for ourselves, but thinking about something moving as fast as Mach 6 (about 4600 mph), I wouldn’t mind taking a ride, if it was able to seat a man. It’s not as fast as the moon launch, but I would still like to give it a go.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top