IrisSenior
Senior Member
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
My brothers 65 and 75 do not know how to use a computer and probably never will.
I don’t know anyone that doesn’t know how to use one, but I’m constantly surprised at how limited they allow their skills to be...or the internet , generally ?
The other day when I was in the surgery waiting room, I sparked up a convo with 2 women who were waiting to see their respective Doctors...both were in their early 70's..so about 5 or 6 years older than me..
One was bemoaning the fact that she had trouble getting a blood test and had to jump through hoops with forms.. as she waved one around.., and I told her that I always book mine online.. She said that she didn't have a computer and wouldn't know how to use it anyway.. and with that, the second lady agreed, that she was the same ...
Now these were not doddering old biddies.. they were on the ball women it seemed to me.. so I was very surprised to realise that out of the 3 of us there.. 2/3rds didn't know how to use a Computer..
Do you know anyone who doesn't use one after all these years since we've commonly had home computers , who is perfectly capable of learning..?
I'm considering a dash cam for the car, just to document pedestrians that step out in front of my vehicle without so much as a glance...I have never once walked down the road staring at my phone or texting..or even taking a phone call.
you should.. given that so many never look up from their phones even while crossing the road.. at least you have proof when you knock one over that they stepped out without looking..I'm considering a dash cam for the car, just to document pedestrian that steps out in front of my vehicle without so much as a glance...
By skills I'm assuming that you mean technology/computer skills. That I have read and re-read both Chaucer and Shakespeare and can probably quote you any of The Bard's thirty eight plays and most, if not all, of his sonnets, doesn't show you how limited my skills can be.I don’t know anyone that doesn’t know how to use one, but I’m constantly surprised at how limited they allow their skills to be.
Of course you are right about everyone and their own skills. I was referring strictly to computer skills.By skills I'm assuming that you mean technology/computer skills. That I have read and re-read both Chaucer and Shakespeare and can probably quote you any of The Bard's thirty eight plays and most, if not all, of his sonnets, doesn't show you how limited my skills can be.
To that you can add the works of John Gower and the author of Piers Plowman, also known as: William Langland.
Apologies if that comes across as boastful, the point I'm making is that not everyone has the same skills as everyone else.
How in the universe did you get that word to print while the censor bleeps out so many others?As in Janet & John book one? Well that's about my intellectual understanding of internet based technology, so much so that I don't even know what cat videos mean, unless that's videos of the antics that cats get up to. There again, thanks to our American friends, I am familiar with the colloquial term of pussy. When I stroke my wife's pussy, she dribbles
View attachment 237564View attachment 237565
Would I have it any other way?
.
At my school, computers were becoming common in most classrooms around the 80s, but I can't remember exactly, and eventually we had a computer lab. The principal told the secretaries they would be getting computers too, and informed them they would be taking a class on basic computer use. This was the biggest point of resistance in our system... from secretaries, who insisted everything they needed to do, they could do on their typewriters, but the principle held firm, and their typewriters were replaced and the secretaries kicking and screaming were forced to learn computers. It wasn't long before any new upgraded computers were purchased that the best computers ended up in the main office, and teachers and kids got the secretary's hand downs.I think you hit the nail on the head. It's not like computers are a brand new revolution. Workspaces with terminals became more common in the 70's and exploded in the 80's. Those who had jobs that required working on the computers learned to adapt as times changed. Computers have been a part of their lives for 40 plus years now. And when the home PC market exploded in the 90's more and more people jumped on board, even if they had not had previous PC experience. So it isn't a "new" thing. But there are some people who were perhaps in their 50's or 60's at that time who had no interest in learning this "new" thing and that is fine. But many around that age group at that time did take the time and effort to learn . I am guessing many are on this forum
What I do not understand are those who seem to think it is a "badge of honor" not to learn the new technology. If a person does not want to take the time to learn how to use a smart phone or a tablet that is fine and in ways understandable. But I do not understand those who think it is something to be "proud" of. One can chose to either hop on board and use the technology that is offered today or not but either choice is not something to be proud of. It's just a personal choice.
Not all of us secretaries were like that. I hated typewriters with a passion--although that's how I learned my living thus explaining why I've been in a bad mood most of my adult life--and embraced the word processor and later the computer with open arms.This was the biggest point of resistance in our system... from secretaries, who insisted everything they needed to do, they could do on their typewriters, but the principle held firm, and their typewriters were replaced and the secretaries kicking and screaming were forced to learn computers
I agree..I really hated typing, ..mainly because I had to type on Manual Typewriters and my hands are little , so the keys were hard to press, and made my fingers really acheNot all of us secretaries were like that. I hated typewriters with a passion--although that's how I learned my living thus explaining why I've been in a bad mood most of my adult life--and embraced the word processor and later the computer with open arms.
Yeah, and besides, my "little fingers" are a bit short and could never reach the Q or P or press them down. It's so much easier on the computer keyboard.I agree..I really hated typing, ..mainly because I had to type on Manual Typewriters and my hands are little , so the keys were hard to press, and made my fingers really ache
My husband just said something so funny this morning and it made me think of this thread. We have a streaming service for TV called SuperBox and occasionally it will go down which really irritates him. He got a message on the TV stating the server was down so he said, "why don't they just unplug the *amn thing and put in a new one?" Without laughing I answered, "sorry dear, it doesn't work that way". Can't believe I was able to say that with a straight face! All hope is gone.If I bite the dust first, all I can say is "my poor husband". First the lights will go out, then the water will be turned off and the garbage not collected. Then he'll get a registered letter stating the house is being seized by the bank and he has 30 days to get out.
He'll die before ever learning. I've tried showing him how to pay bills on line but his attention span is short when sitting in front of a computer. Hope his brother will take him in.![]()
I agree about the choice. I think it's unfair that some places can only be accessed through the internet. Or they have no way for people to do stuff on paper like before.I wouldn't judge anyone who chooses not to learn how to use a computer, and I do find it quite insidious that in the last 30? years, technology has crept up on us so much that being online is a must, rather than a choice. I know a few people who prefer to stay "unconnected" and they are very happy with their lives.