A
Personally, I think it's all about what the wife wanted at that moment. And if she wanted him at her side, he should have been and if she sent him off to play....her choices. Now if he'd gone to play a stupid game (is my bias showinglayful
and she wanted him to stay, then in my book, he'd be a less than stellar husband. Whomever is lying in that bed gets to decide.
When my friend was sick and dying in the hospital, she sent her husband off for a weekend because she could see that he was getting frazzled and worn from the effects of her illness on their lives. He went to his buddy's place for a couple days, to unwind and play chess and get his equilibrium back before returning to her side. Unfortunately, she died while he was at Cliff's and he couldn't get back to her side in time. Was he wrong for going, in my opinion no, because she released him, she sent him off. Maybe she knew that her time was imminent and she wanted him to not have to go through it because it was her journey. I don't know about that, but she was in charge because she was the one laying in the bed.
Would the CEO of a major corporation get basted if he missed a child's birth because it was "imperative" he attend a board meeting regarding the company's financial woes?
If the husband was in in any other kind of work, he would probably have got leave of absence to be with his wife during the birth of their child. Even if he was professional sports player he could have got leave if he wanted to. What is it about sports teams that make them take priority above everything else.
It's not at all selfish to want the husband with you during the birth, since it is both partners' child, shouldn't the father share in the experience. To me it seems like the man is the selfish one, and sexist on top of it, to be out playing sports while his wife is alone and struggling giving birth. In the old days the women often had to face labor alone and with not much moral or emotional support, because men considered it women's business. In fact it is very much like being alone in a cabin in the backwoods if you are with a bunch of strangers during the birth. But since she was with her extended family, she was OK and not complaining, which she probably would dare not anyway, as that would look bad for her husband and his team.
I can't answer that but I suspect that even a highly successful businessman might make the effort to be present at his child's birth. This footballer is not that eminent and his team is/was not in any danger of losing the match.
Would the CEO of a major corporation get basted if he missed a child's birth because it was "imperative" he attend a board meeting regarding the company's financial woes?
Football is James Robert's profession, he is very well paid, and it's a relatively short career.
And give his wife some credit!
I think her husband is being beaten down for this because many women, and some men, believe his place was at his wife's side.
I think her husband is being beaten down for this because many women, and some men, believe his place was at his wife's side. I suspect if men who support his choice experienced the realities of labour first hand, their attitude might change. No one who has not done so, has much credibility IMHO.