Idiot of the Year

[Don M.]

I cannot believe anyone would be so inhumane as to do something like this. The neighbor across the road has a nice pond, and a couple of his ducks have adopted our yard nearly every morning, as they search for bugs, etc., among the grass. I cannot imagine doing these cute birds any harm.

http://www.examiner.com/article/jas...aper-mows-over-baby-ducks-with-extreme-intent

I hope the Florida authorities throw the book at this idiot.

 

[AZ Jim]

That make my blood boil. I absolutely despise those who are cruel to any animal or child. If that happened as I watch I would have made that creep pay one way or another.

 

[Don M.]

We have several frogs and Box turtles in our yard. I always keep an eye out for them when mowing, and stop the mower, and move them out of harms way. They were here first, and do a great job of keeping the pesky bugs under control...so I try to avoid doing them any damage. I cannot fathom someone running over a duck...especially intentionally. This guy is beyond Sick.

 

[Falcon]

And on this Jim, I'd have joined you. Between the 2 of us we could have thought up the most appropriate punishment
for this knuckle-dragging

mouth breathing A$$hole.

 

[SeaBreeze]

There's no shortage of these monsters in this world, I despise anyone who abuses or kills animals. I'd like to do the exact same thing to them as they did to these poor helpless creatures.

 

[Warrigal]

I hope the authorities look into his past behaviour as well because sadistic people like that tend to have histories that suggest that they will continue to enjoy cruelty. Such histories should be mentioned at sentencing.

 

[SifuPhil]

No, no, no!

We have to assume he is innocent until proven guilty, then we have to get the best possible lawyers for him, because Heaven knows he might be innocent and all that duck DNA might be wrong and the eyewitnesses might be blind and ...

Shoe's on the other foot with animals, isn't it? Too bad the same logic doesn't apply to so-called humans ...

 

[Glinda]

This guy is a despicable sicko.

 

[Warrigal]

No, no, no!

We have to assume he is innocent until proven guilty, then we have to get the best possible lawyers for him, because Heaven knows he might be innocent and all that duck DNA might be wrong and the eyewitnesses might be blind and ...

Shoe's on the other foot with animals, isn't it? Too bad the same logic doesn't apply to so-called humans ...

OK, I know you're being ironic (sarcastic?) but I did say "mentioned at sentencing", not during any trial. If he's being sentenced, he's already been found guilty.

 

[Ameriscot]

Sick b**tard!!