Interesting development in DNA forensics

Warrigal

SF VIP
A man in South Australia has been arrested and charged with two rapes using DNA analysis from the victims. Although his DNA was not recorded on the police data base, the DNA of a close relative was there. Using that link, they tracked down the offender and charged him.

Of course, they still have to prove it in court but I guess that's where the victims come into the picture.


Rape arrest in Australian DNA first
By Margaret Scheikowski
July 24, 2015

An Adelaide man has become the first person in Australia to be arrested after a relative's DNA was linked to samples taken from a crime scene. The 56-year-old is charged over two late-night sex attacks in North Adelaide, which took place in September and November 2012.

In one attack, a 23-year-old woman who was walking along a street was raped. In the other, a 21-year-old woman was grabbed from behind and dragged into the grounds of the nearby St Peters Cathedral, before she managed to run away.

DNA from both crimes scenes was run through the national DNA database but no direct match was found, Assistant Commissioner Linda Fellows said. Detectives then worked with experts from Forensic Sciences of South Australia (FSSA) to see if a "familial" match - one involving a close biological relative - could be made.

After the crime scene DNA was linked to a person on the database, detectives "went down a different path" in their investigations. Ultimately, they arrested the relative who had not been a suspect.

"I understand it is the first time in Australia that (a familial match) has resulted in criminal charges being made," Ass Com Fellows told reporters on Friday.
"It has been used to conduct other investigations, but this is the first time that we have been able to charge someone criminally. It is a very significant breakthrough."

The algorithms used on the traditional database weren't suitable for familial comparisons, said FSSA director Chris Pearman. But over the last 12 months FSSA, in conjunction with the forensic laboratory in Auckland, has developed more sophisticated algorithms giving much better familial searching capability.

"It represents a lot of work," he said. "Unlike the day-to-day matching we do, there is no certainty that the results we get are a closely related individual, so we get a ranking from the software."

Everyone on the database was given a probability of being related to the crime scene sample. "We take the top 100 of those individuals and do further DNA screening work to reduce that pool of possible related individuals," Mr Pearman said.

The reduced list is given to detectives for further investigation.
Police won't detail the nature of the relationship between the accused and the relative, nor the crime that saw the relative included on the database.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/sa/a/29021512/rape-arrest-in-australian-dna-first/
 

If I had been a scientist instead of a science teacher I would have like to work in forensic science.
I find this kind of investigative science fascinating.
 

Thank goodness they have nabbed him ,there were a lot of very nervous women In the area, it was reported on our news he is possibly responsible for other unsolved rapes ..
 
Don't think that the victims will be too concerned about the ethics, or most of the public for that matter...
 
The area..... North Adelaide is part of the city of Adelaide ... Walking distance from the main city area .....it's a very upmarket suburb....

I agree with with you Ralphy , the victims will live with the attack for the rest of their lives..long after he is released from prision..
 
Not sure what would be considered unethical in this matter anyhow...

Despite common perception, DNA testing is not 100% accurate.

They're also getting to the point where they'll be predicting future crimes based on your genetics - wasn't there a sci-fi movie about that a while back?
 
If I had been a scientist instead of a science teacher I would have like to work in forensic science.
I find this kind of investigative science fascinating.

I find forensic science very interesting. Would have been an good career! Love to watch them solve crimes on those true programmes with a tiny bit of evidence. Or they use DNA to solve very old crimes that happened well before DNA testing was available.
 
I don't think there is much of an ethical problem.

I see it as the police following up a lead.

The rapists leaves DNA on two victims and analysis shows that it is the same perp.
Reference to the police DB of convicted felons doesn't reveal a match for the perp but does suggest that some offenders on the DB may be relatives.
Police investigation then looks at the most likely suspects looking for corroboratory evidence, narrowing it down to one suspect.

All legal policing as far as I am concerned. Hair, blood, sperm left on a victim is evidence and the DNA DB is a library of felons in the same way that a set of mug shots is a DB that can be referenced to solve crimes.
 
Don't think that the victims will be too concerned about the ethics, or most of the public for that matter...

The innocent family members are now dragged into an investigation with their dna becoming public. I don't know in detail the Australian court system but wouldn't that family dna have to be explained as part of the evidence ie entered into the record. And the presence of DNA still has to be explained which could be for other unassociated reasons.
 
I find forensic science very interesting. Would have been an good career! Love to watch them solve crimes on those true programmes with a tiny bit of evidence. Or they use DNA to solve very old crimes that happened well before DNA testing was available.

Yes, I watch Dateline every Friday night. I love to see the web tighten on the criminals who thought they got away with it. Though I'm not much interested in science, forensic science is fascinating.
 


Back
Top