Jeb Bush and his compassionate response to unwed mothers

AZ Jim

R.I.P. With Us In Spirit Only
Jeb Bush In 1995: Unwed Mothers Should Be Publicly Shamed

huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/09/jeb-bush-1995-book_n_7542964.html
Laura Bassett Become a fan lbassett@huffingtonpost.com Email Public shaming would be an effective way to regulate the “irresponsible behavior” of unwed mothers, misbehaving teenagers and welfare recipients, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) argued in his 1995 book Profiles in Character.
In a chapter called "The Restoration of Shame,” the likely 2016 presidential candidate made the case that restoring the art of public humiliation could help prevent pregnancies “out of wedlock.”
One of the reasons more young women are giving birth out of wedlock and more young men are walking away from their paternal obligations is that there is no longer a stigma attached to this behavior, no reason to feel shame. Many of these young women and young men look around and see their friends engaged in the same irresponsible conduct. Their parents and neighbors have become ineffective at attaching some sense of ridicule to this behavior. There was a time when neighbors and communities would frown on out of wedlock births and when public condemnation was enough of a stimulus for one to be careful.


Bush points to Nathaniel Hawthorne's 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter, in which the main character is forced to wear a large red "A" for "adulterer" on her clothes to punish her for having an extramarital affair that produced a child, as an early model for his worldview. "Infamous shotgun weddings and Nathaniel Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter are reminders that public condemnation of irresponsible sexual behavior has strong historical roots,” Bush wrote.
As governor of Florida in 2001, Bush had the opportunity to test his theory on public shaming. He declined to veto a very controversial bill that required single mothers who did not know the identity of the father to publish their sexual histories in a newspaper before they could legally put their babies up for adoption. He later signed a repeal of the so-called "Scarlet Letter" law in 2003 after it was successfully challenged in court.


Bush's ideas about public shaming extended beyond unwed parents. He said American schools and the welfare system could use a healthy dose of shame as well. “For many, it is more shameful to work than to take public assistance -- that is how backward shame has become!” he wrote, adding that the juvenile criminal justice system also "seems to be lacking in humiliation," Bush wrote.
In the context of present-day society we need to make kids feel shame before their friends rather than their family. The Miami Herald columnist Robert Steinbeck has a good idea. He suggests dressing these juveniles in frilly pink jumpsuits and making them sweep the streets of their own neighborhoods! Would these kids be so cavalier then?


It's worth pointing out that the kind of public shaming Bush described has come under fire recently in response to the growing trend of parents humiliating their children on social media to punish them. A 13-year-old girl committed suicide last month after her father posted a video of himself cutting off her long hair on YouTube because she had disobeyed him.
YouTube and social media, of course, did not exist when Bush wrote his book in 1995. But the former governor makes clear that "society needs to relearn the art of public and private disapproval and how to make those to engage in some undesirable behavior feel some sense of shame."
Bush did not respond to a request for comment.
 

Big government Republicons want THEIR citizens put in their place. Junior is trying to hit an emotional nerve but the problem is the nerve he hit is the wrong one.
 
Interesting article, Jim, but I find longer articles like this hard to read due to squished spacing. I would prefer if the poster opened it up by inserting spaces in between the paragraphs to make it easier on the eyes, and/or changing to font to a larger one. Otherwise it is just TLWR (Too long won't read). I wonder if anyone else feels the same.
 

Interesting article, Jim, but I find longer articles like this hard to read due to squished spacing. I would prefer if the poster opened it up by inserting spaces in between the paragraphs to make it easier on the eyes, and/or changing to font to a larger one. Otherwise it is just TLWR (Too long won't read). I wonder if anyone else feels the same.

Cookie, I agree and I fixed it. I use a program that will take a story out of a complex page and make it a singular article but it does not leave the original paragraph breaks. It's a great program except that failing. http://www.printfriendly.com/
 
I'm not for public shamming. When I worked at one particular nursing home for 8 years, I saw this sub culture of single mothers, revolving males in their lives. I was treated by some of these women as the freak. In those 8 years there were four incidents of stabbings and shootings of family members and boy friends of some of these nurses aids. Some ended in death. It was really strange there at times.
 
We're talking about poor women here, aren't we? Not about the two women I have known since their birth, one an anaesthetist and the other a director of a child care centre. Both of the decided that in the absence of a male partner they would have a child by AI. Their parents are delighted with their grand children and the little ones are very cherished.

These women are lucky. They are single mothers by choice, unlike their poorer sisters who are more likely to be abandoned by the fathers of their children.
 
You think THAT was bad? Here's MORE of the story

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ms-advertise-sexual-history-article-1.2253178

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...d-moms-was-the-law-in-jeb-bush-s-florida.html

The so-called Scarlet Letter law passed in Florida under Jeb’s watch. But the way he tried to fix it made it less offensive (kinda) but still pretty weird.
Remember that time when Governor Jeb Bush allowed a bill to become law that required unwed, pregnant women to publish their sexual history in the newspaper in order to give their babies up for adoption?

No? Well, it happened.

But this was just the beginning of the weird parental follies of Florida in the early 2000s.
In 2001, Bush didn’t veto adoption-overhaul legislation that included a provision making it harder for unwed mothers to put their children up for adoption, as The Huffington Post recently reported.

And by taking a pass, he allowed a particularly offensive provision to become law.
This provision required any woman who wanted to put her child up for adoption, but who didn’t know who the father was, to take out an ad in a local newspaper listing her name and description, as well as the name and description of each possible father and the locations where the baby could have been conceived.

In other words, women had to broadcast her sexual histories to, well, pretty much everybody before attempting to find stable homes for her children. Let me get this straight... Republicans don't want women to have abortions, but if a woman agrees to have the baby and put it up for adoption she has to go through public shaming in the NEWSPAPER?

But of course there was an exception for RAPE victims... Right? WRONG!.. Even victims of rape had to publish and account an description of the rapist.. for what? I guess so he could locate her and terrorize her for life.. who knows. THIS is just an example of what you would be getting nation wide if you elect one of these wacko bird conservatives.. better think about it. Because the "War on Women" is NOT a liberal fantasy... It's a stark reality.
 
That is absolutely unbelievable Quicksilver. What genius dreamed up that legislation?
Is there a think tank behind it?

This law was written and passed by the Florida legislature under then Governor Jeb Bush.. From the article...

The law’s sponsor, state Senator Walter Campbell, said the provision was designed to keep “potential biological fathers from coming back and taking children out of adoptive parents’ hands.” And the law didn’t include an exception for women who became pregnant because of rape.

“You cannot just allow someone to say they were raped and use that as an excuse not to provide a name,” said Deborah Marks, who helped draft the law, at the time.

The quote by one of the drafters of the law.. about using RAPE as an excuse? that was a Republican woman.. imagine.
 
I can't imagine.

Thinking about this some more.

Is this legislation still on the books or has it bee amended/removed?
Wouldn't this kind od extreme treatment of women be enough to make him an unpopular candidate for POTUS?
Or would it have the opposite effect?
 
This is what we Democrats mean when we marvel at just HOW the poor, elderly, minorities and women can even think of voting Republican.. It DOES boggle the mind. There is such hatred and an overpowering meanness about them.
 
No, no, they have all had an epiphany and promise to take care of you better than Hillary can...:eek:nthego:
 

Back
Top