Paco Dennis
SF VIP
- Location
- Mid-Missouri
Peterson is one of the most intelligent, forward-thinking men I've ever encountered.Jordan Peterson reminds me of a homeless guy downtown who rants at people emotionally but never really says anything substantial. He just goes from topic to topic and blathers on about Carl Jung just to have words coming out of his mouth, or it seems like that's his only goal when he talks.
David Graeber is another one like that. He just blathers on and on without saying much of anything.
I guess both of them are what pass for philosophers in this day and age.
I picked up something else.All he really said was if you're miserable in your job, leave it for another one.
Jordan Peterson reminds me of a homeless guy downtown who rants at people emotionally but never really says anything substantial. He just goes from topic to topic and blathers on about Carl Jung just to have words coming out of his mouth, or it seems like that's his only goal when he talks.
David Graeber is another one like that. He just blathers on and on without saying much of anything.
I guess both of them are what pass for philosophers in this day and age.
You're lucky. I wish I felt that way about a contemporary philosopher.Peterson is one of the most intelligent, forward-thinking men I've ever encountered.
Jordan Peterson reminds me of a homeless guy downtown who rants at people emotionally but never really says anything substantial. He just goes from topic to topic and blathers on about Carl Jung just to have words coming out of his mouth, or it seems like that's his only goal when he talks.
David Graeber is another one like that. He just blathers on and on without saying much of anything.
I guess both of them are what pass for philosophers in this day and age.
Free associating is a good way to describe what he's doing. Blabbering on and on is another.Jordan is a real trip. He is highly intellectual and lost in empathetic/sympathetic emotions. But, he is very transparent. For me I can't believe sometimes how he says the same thing for 1/2 hour though. He is just free associating all the intellectual knowledge he has about psychological phenomena. He made a big mistake after his wife died, and started taking psyc meds. ( when they were becoming very contraversial - especially a psychologist should know the risks ) He had a horrible time ( and still does occasionally ) tapering off of them. Quite a story in itself.
My take is at least move in the dierection of what fulfills you. Don't just quit your job, but make a commitment to not giving up on what you want. You might find out it was stupid, or a bad move, but the struggle also is important, so keep going even if it seems hopeless. Hopelessness is what he seems to be guiding the listener away from.
It's a far better description than, say, disorganized rambling or blabbering. He does detour but he rarely goes completely off-topic, the detours do relate, you just have to pay a lot of attention, and that isn't always easy. He's admitted that himself. His problem is that he wants to convey the bigger picture, but he's mistaken to think that's always necessary. It usually isn't.Free associating is a good way to describe what he's doing. Blabbering on and on is another.![]()
Yeah, there are an awful lot of baloney cannons out there these days.You're lucky. I wish I felt that way about a contemporary philosopher.
I feel for Jorden Peterson, he is an ethical man in the world of unethical media. he truly whats to help and is going about it honestlyYeah, there are an awful lot of baloney cannons out there these days.