Justifiable Lynchings?

Again, you choose emotionally-laden examples.

A good old-fashioned whipping might put them on the right path. Banishment to the South Bronx for a year. Something creative ...

Again... you cannot put this in the hands of the populace. Who is going to decide the punishment? Will there be someone in charge to see that the proper punishment be dealt.. or will MOB rule take over and people will be slaughtered for breaking and entering? We have seen mob mentality at work.. Humans can be vicious ESPECIALLY if they feel they are morally (or ethnically) superior. It's not like we don't have plenty of that going around.
 

Yes.. a mob of humans can become a pack of wolves...driven by bloodlust..

All sense and reason goes out of the window..
 
Yes..mob of humans can become a pack of wolves...driven by bloodlust..

All sense and reason goes out of the window..

It definitely would be bloodlust.. Also, punishment is certain to not be equal. Certain ethnic groups would be dealt with much more severely than others... depending on which group was doling out the "justice". Our system is far from perfect, but certainly better than street vigilantism. Who here would want to be involved in a minor traffic incident and pulled from your car to be "punished"...? Would the neighborhood you were in change your answer?? lol!!
 
Do they still exist???


Oh my Goodness YES.... For many years they were in the shadows, but with the election of our first Black President they have become emboldened and in fact a few have even run for public office. Racism here is alive and well. Fortunately the civil rights laws have prevented much of the old Jim Crow actions, but the mentality remains and is more openly voiced.
 
We did have a milder version called the BNP..British National Party..whose main object was to vilify immigrants..regardless of their colour..They seemed mainly to attack Muslims..but had to be very careful what they said...It is now mainly defunct as it appeared to be run by Neo-Nazi's...

Our latest one..(a much milder version) is called UKIP..United Kingdom Independence Party...who are more concerned with Britain leaving the EU..and putting a stop to economic migrants from the Eastern European countries..
 
Just looked it up..they seem to be the henchmen of these parties..violent psychopaths with the IQ of a park bench...

We also have the EDL..English Defence league..who show up in largely immigrant areas...have a ''peaceful'' protest...and then go home..

I was going to post a link...but it is really racist..
 
Again... you cannot put this in the hands of the populace. Who is going to decide the punishment? Will there be someone in charge to see that the proper punishment be dealt.. or will MOB rule take over and people will be slaughtered for breaking and entering?

I see a major difference between mob rule and vigilantism. Mob rule is unorganized, unthinking, unknowing. Vigilantes know out the door what they're about and what they're doing and they have limits.

We have seen mob mentality at work.. Humans can be vicious ESPECIALLY if they feel they are morally (or ethnically) superior. It's not like we don't have plenty of that going around.

Yes, I agree ... like Ferguson.
 
What do you think could be the most efficient deterrents for theft, burglary, rape, and other crimes?
The threat of:
Lynching
KKK
Jail sentence
Incarceration in a concentration camp type of facility
A combination of psychology lectures and/or daily beatings
Or?
 
How about ensure that the children are raised well and have decent education even if their parents are unable to afford one for them.
Can't help but agree with you, D.W.
Being out of touch I don't know if it's still fashionable for parents to provide children with a weekly allowance and to encourage them to have part-time jobs.
Would this not strengthen their self-confidence, and they would not have to resort to shop-lifting?
I used to make a list of chores, putting a price tag on each chore.
This worked well!
One did the shopping, one the cooking, one the washing-up, etc. (We had absolutely no material possessions at that time, and I did not want my children to feel envious of others!)
Eventually, they confidently slipped into young adulthood.
I do believe harsh, sarcastic criticism of children does untold damage, should be avoided at all costs.
 
Hubby and I were comfortable because we were both drawing teachers' wages but we still tried to instil responsibility into our children. They each received an allowance but it was not a wage for doing chores. Even if we had nothing to give them they would still have had to contribute their share to the family and home in the form of chores. When they had the opportunity to go on a major school excursion they each had to save some of their pocket money towards it to emphasise that nothing comes for nothing. When each finished high school and before entering tertiary education they were both expected to get a temporary job because I wasn't having them loll about the house for three months, waking at noon and awake half the night.

They were both lucky to receive good educations but both have had to weather difficult periods raising their own children. I'm proud to say the grand children have all grown up to be fine young adults who should be resilient enough and well prepared enough to pass the important lessons on to the next generation.

But what of the children whose parents are incompetent or worse still, negligent? I believe that we, that is society in general, owes them something too. We owe them the best opportunities to build a worthwhile future for their sake and for the sake of us all. That's why schools, youth groups, welfare workers and neighbours are so very important. And grandparents more than anyone. No child should ever be written off or thrown early onto society's scrap heap.
 
The example, structure, love and discipline provided by parents is the key to responsible offspring. The government has tried to offset no or poor parenting but the results have been dismal for the most part...
 
The example, structure, love and discipline provided by parents is the key to responsible offspring. The government has tried to offset no or poor parenting but the results have been dismal for the most part...

Not sure what the solution would be.. There are always going to be poor parents, particularly in poverty situations. The cycle has to be broken somehow.. and I don't think taking the food out of children's mouths is the answer. It seems like the pat answer to poverty is to take away benefits.. like that is suddenly going to force folks out to take that $50,000 a year job that is out there waiting for them.. Raising the minimum wage would be a start. Perhaps if people didn't have to work two or three jobs to make ends meet they could be home more to attend to their kids.
 


Back
Top