applecruncher
SF VIP
- Location
- Ohio USA
That’s exactly correct. A defense attorney (or Prosecutor for that matter) cannot introduce new evidence to an Appellate Court. Appellate Courts only rule on trial evidence that was already presented at trial. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there is no guarantee that the Appellate Court would even hear oral arguments, if after reading the defense attorney’s brief that they find no wrong-doing during the trial. And, even if there were minor errors, the Appellate Court could rule to hold the trial judge’s errors as harmless.Here, it takes a bit to get a criminal conviction overturned. Appellate courts will not reject the verdict of a jury unless they find that there was some error in the trial itself that affected the outcome or that there wasn't adequate evidence to support the jury's verdict, which is a pretty low bar. Our appellate court won't rethink the jury's weighing of the evidence, so in a "could go either way" situation they won't overturn the verdict. Lots of people think you can bring in new evidence on direct appeal, but here, at least, that's not true. The appellate court can only review what was presented at the original trial, and they cannot go beyond the trial transcripts, the pleadings, and the exhibits. An appeal is not a new trial, it is judicial review of the original trial.
Drejka doesn't appear to be physically capable of defending himself from being attacked and pushed to the ground. The stepping back could be viewed like that. But with no sound to know what was said how can anyone be certain re positioning to do further harm wasn't the intent?
The justice system works, so if there is appeal by Drejka maybe Applecruncher will keep us informed.
That’s exactly correct. A defense attorney (or Prosecutor for that matter) cannot introduce new evidence to an Appellate Court. Appellate Courts only rule on trial evidence that was already presented at trial. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there is no guarantee that the Appellate Court would even hear oral arguments, if after reading the defense attorney’s brief that they find no wrong-doing during the trial. And, even if there were minor errors, the Appellate Court could rule to hold the trial judge’s errors as harmless.
If I was a gambler, I would bet that this case is over.
We all can see McGlockton attack Drejka. We can also see Drejka pull a gun on him. And we can also see McGlockton backing away from Drejka when he sees the gun. The show of the gun was all that was needed to remove the threat. The shooting was totally unnecessary.
I'd like to ask you another question RPG. What kind of man gets in the face of a woman with small kids? Over a freakin parking place for Christ sake? I can't imagine a scenario where I would do such a thing. Would you?
I might approach her and point out that these spaces are for the handicapped....[although I never actually have] and if she started yelling?....yeah i might [probably would] yell back.
I agree. Even if they hear oral arguments, those have to be based on what's in the briefs, and briefs have to be specific about what the attorney claims is wrong with the trial. They can't just go in and say "The jury got it wrong." Most trial errors are harmless error and don't affect the outcome of the trial.
I'd bet this one is over, too.
I've never understood why anyone would approach someone & point out that they're in a handicapped space. Do you actually think someone wouldn't already know that? Since they know it's a handicapped space & they're parking there, anyway, they're obviously an inconsiderate moron. What good is it to tell them? Especially when you'd get a reply like, "Go screw yourself."I might approach her and point out that these spaces are for the handicapped....[although I never actually have] and if she started yelling?....yeah i might [probably would] yell back.
I've never understood why anyone would approach someone & point out that they're in a handicapped space. Do you actually think someone wouldn't already know that? Since they know it's a handicapped space & they're parking there, anyway, they're obviously an inconsiderate moron. What good is it to tell them? Especially when you'd get a reply like, "Go screw yourself."
What difference does it make to your lifestyle when someone disobeys the rules.I might approach her and point out that these spaces are for the handicapped....[although I never actually have] and if she started yelling?....yeah i might [probably would] yell back.
What difference does it make to your lifestyle when someone disobeys the rules.
If you are handicapped, and you don't get a spot, yes you should speak up.
But it's not worth a life. If you are assaulted get the licence number and call the police.
Death is so final.
I predict that Drejka is going to meet lots of new friends in the prison showers and around every corner. Prisoners reportedly have a way of meting out justice. Swiftly and decisively. Not saying it's right, just saying it happens.
Thanks for the information from the reliable source.This is where so many people make their mistake, but you make a good point. If anyone sees a car parked in a handicapped spot, this is when you report it to the police. If they have an officer in the area and is not busy, they may respond and take up the issue with the driver.
Keep in mind that different states have different laws. In Pennsylvania, if you would call and report this vehicle with the license number and the car would leave before the officer responds to the call, he would be amiss because according to our laws, the driver must be cited and not the car. So, if I were the officer responding and the car was gone and I would go to the owner of the car’s house and ask him who was driving the car and he replied, “I don’t remember,” game over. All the officer can do is leave.
Same thing on an assault or road rage. If I’m driving down the road and someone (for whatever reason) waves his gun at me, I need to call the police immediately and hope that they can catch him/her before the car is parked and there is no driver behind the wheel. Again, police must cite the driver, unless a passenger admits to doing the act, and not the car. The car is not guilty of doing anything. Make sense?
I know of one state that no matter what goes on; litter being tossed out the window, someone flips another driver the bird, whatever, the owner would be charged and cited. If he didn’t do it and could convince one of his or hers passengers to admit guilt, the driver could get off the hook. This is another one of our laws that used to get my goat.
OK, so far so good. So, if the state appeals court upholds the sentence and denies a new trial, or even to listen to oral arguments, the next step would be to appeal to a federal appeals court? And, if that fails, the defendant would have to request that the U.S. Supreme Court hear the case?
So, would the defendant have to not only pay for his attorneys, but would he also be charged the court costs?
It will never get this far, I’m just trying to understand the progression of an appeals case. I was never involved in a federal appeals case.
It's never over, even though we think it's over.
I just watched a "20/20" report on the Chowchilla kidnapping. You may recall 3 guys kidnapped a bus load of kids & their driver & buried them underground while they demanded ransom. Some of the kids were injured & (of course) all were traumatized for life. That made the kidnappers eligible for life without parole sentences, which they received.
Later, an appeals court ruled that the kids were not injured severely enough to warrant life without parole & threw out the sentence. Two of the kidnappers have been released.
I can only speak to what happens here. I'm not a lawyer, and I'm speaking from what is readily available on the internet regarding court rules and procedure.
Here, if you cannot afford to pay for a defense at the trial level, the state appoints an attorney to represent you at no cost to you -- either the Public Defender or contract counsel.
On direct appeal, the state will also appoint appellate counsel for you and I imagine that continues to state habeas as well.
As to habeas to a federal court, the court may appoint counsel to represent you under the Criminal Justice Act if you meet the requirements for appointed counsel.
As to the Supremes, I believe they have procedures to appoint counsel for the indigent defendant. Bear in mind that just because a person wants to appeal to the Supreme Court doesn't mean that the court will agree to hear the case. They have strict limitations about which cases they will hear.
If you have appointed counsel, costs are generally also paid by the court.
No, it's not surprising. I also remember Bill Clinton pardoning drug dealers whose families contributed to his campaign (with drug money proceeds) just before he left office. Such powers should not be in any politician's hands. They make our justice system even more pathetic than it already is.In Pennsylvania and some other states, when a defendant is convicted of Felony Murder, or what some call, First Degree Premeditated Murder, the penalty is out of the judge’s hands. The defendant is sentenced to life w/o parole. However, there have been times, not only in Pennsylvania, but other states as well, where the Governor has either commuted a sentence to time served or granted clemency.
These acts by the Governor usually do not sit well with the public and this is why the Governor will generally take these actions when he is in his last year in office. Not surprising, huh?
What made me ask the question was that I recently watched the Ted Bundy story. I’m sure that you know John Henry Browne defended Bundy against his wishes and in fact asked the judge to be excused, which was denied. Anyone that knows anything about Mr. Browne, knows that he is a lawyer’s lawyer. I had the pleasure of meeting him and I found him to be very intelligent, interesting and honest. Most people would not believe that of any lawyer.
Anyway, I wondered how much was paid for his defense. He filed several appeals, all of which failed. I would really like to know how much Atty. Browne was paid. Do you know if Browne was also Bundy’s Appellate Attorney? Can a trial attorney also act as an appellate attorney in the same case? I never saw it happen, but can it?
Parking illegally is no reason to escalate a dispute. Businesses call the appropriate law enforcement agency (city or county) to handle it here, regularly I might add. Those $250 golden tickets do not get a pass at trial either.