Only in America..

SeaBreeze said:
Only in America can something written by a American conservative, perhaps one one that runs the Right Wing News?http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/04/10/20_only_in_america_ironies/page/full , will people believe it was authored by a Canadian and keep the trash in circulation by forwarding it to others for almost 3 years on the internet.

Only in America will the conservative author be so anxious to get this garbage out, that he slips up on #8...writing "our", so much for Canadian.

#9 WHO says that the American government still discriminates against black Americans, acknowledging racism exists is not discriminating.

#7 Muslim does NOT equal terrorists.

#5 WHO believes someone who wants to balance the budget and believes in the constitution is an extremist?

#4 Buying alcohol, boarding an airplane and cashing a check are not constitutional rights in this country, voting is. Also, you don't have to have a driver's license to do those things, all you need is an approved ID card....not everyone drives now, do they?

#3 WHO demands those investigations?

Sounds like an angry American Republican to me, let's vote for these guys in 2016!
Click to expand...


:thumbsup1::thumbsup1::thumbsup1:

....just another Republican email that goes on forever, with very little truth to it.
 
SeaBreeze said:
Only in America can something written by a American conservative, perhaps one one that runs the Right Wing News?http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/04/10/20_only_in_america_ironies/page/full , will people believe it was authored by a Canadian and keep the trash in circulation by forwarding it to others for almost 3 years on the internet.

Only in America will the conservative author be so anxious to get this garbage out, that he slips up on #8...writing "our", so much for Canadian.

#9 WHO says that the American government still discriminates against black Americans, acknowledging racism exists is not discriminating.

#7 Muslim does NOT equal terrorists.

#5 WHO believes someone who wants to balance the budget and believes in the constitution is an extremist?

#4 Buying alcohol, boarding an airplane and cashing a check are not constitutional rights in this country, voting is. Also, you don't have to have a driver's license to do those things, all you need is an approved ID card....not everyone drives now, do they?

#3 WHO demands those investigations?

Sounds like an angry American Republican to me, let's vote for these guys in 2016!
Click to expand...

Good job SeaBreeze.
 

I'm an expat living in England I get so tired of hearing America trashed !

EASY TARGET & CHEAP SHOTS

Of course America has done some wrong things..
that I'm very unhappy with...We elected George Bush 2 times for goodness sake
how dumb was that??? ( I left the country )

But it is also an amazing country and many of the freedoms we take for granted don't exist in other countries,

even in dear old England

Appreciate our wonderful country...!!!
 
SeaBreeze said:
Only in America can something written by a American conservative, perhaps one one that runs the Right Wing News?http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/04/10/20_only_in_america_ironies/page/full , will people believe it was authored by a Canadian and keep the trash in circulation by forwarding it to others for almost 3 years on the internet.

Only in America will the conservative author be so anxious to get this garbage out, the he slips up on #8...writing "our", so much for Canadian.

#9 WHO says that the American government still discriminates against black Americans, acknowledging racism exists is not discriminating.

#7 Muslim does NOT equal terrorists.

#5 WHO believes someone who wants to balance the budget and believes in the constitution is an extremist?

#4 Buying alcohol, boarding an airplane and cashing a check are not constitutional rights in this country, voting is. Also, you don't have to have a driver's license to do those things, all you need is an approved ID card....not everyone drives now, do they?

#3 WHO demands those investigations?

Sounds like an angry American Republican to me, let's vote for these guys in 2016!
Click to expand...

:thumbsup1:
Nuff Said.
 
Thank you Falcon. It is good to have someone post honest and truthful items in spite of these way left losers that love Obama so badly.

I would like to officially copy this material. Do you have original source you could share?
 
Elyzabeth, nice note. However, I question one statement; the first time Bush became President, he got there by stealing the election, aided and abetted by his brother Jeb. But yes, he did win the second time, which IMO was even dumber!

Seabreeze, I like your answers to the conservative claptrap, as usual filled with misrepresentations of the truth, designed to inflame prejudices. You'd think they'd get tired of blowing that same old horn.
 
Folks that cannot see the major damages caused by the Obama ways are truly blind to reality.

Major debt now at over $18 trillion since he came in at about $10 trillion.

While still under Bush the last two years were run by liberals and they took our debt at about $7.5 trillion on up to about $10 trillion in two years. Bill Clinton had driven the debt down when he was in office. But the new liberals drove it backup to where Obama took over. We have no great things to point to for that total of over $20 trillion more debt on the US government and the taxpayers and voters of the US. Wow, what a wonderful way to go with the government and the taxpayers and voters of the US.

I sure hope this mess does not roll over into a major mess for the us in the coming years. Prior to Bush, and during Bush's term, the housing financials were run by a couple of liberals and everything got completely messed up. Those two then resigned, thankfully.
 
BobF said:
Thank you Falcon. It is good to have someone post honest and truthful items in spite of these way left losers that love Obama so badly.

I would like to officially copy this material. Do you have original source you could share?
Click to expand...

You take pleasure in calling other members "losers"? Is that any way to address your more intelligent superiors?
 
Best look at what some of the liberals call the conservatives before asking this question. To me the liberals are the losers as far as the way the US is supposed to be living.
 
BobF said:
Best look at what some of the liberals call the conservatives before asking this question. To me the liberals are the losers as far as the way the US is supposed to be living.
Click to expand...


So it's your way that's the correct model for America? I have seen others with similar visions who gained the power to enforce their ideals in other places in other times. One of them in particular chose permanently eliminating millions of "losers" that didn't fit in with his grand scheme.
 
AZ Jim said:
[/B][/COLOR]

So it's your way that's the correct model for America? I have seen others with similar visions who gained the power to enforce their ideals in other places in other times. One of them in particular chose permanently eliminating millions of "losers" that didn't fit in with his grand scheme.
Click to expand...

Remember when THIS was making it's way around the net?

open-season-on-liberals-L-aSKlTn.jpeg


This is the mindset of these people... Really Klass Acts.. Huh?
 
Yeah... that too.. AND some people wonder why there is now an insurmountable divide in America. I am well aware that only the stupid Right Wingers feel this way and would find that picture funny... BUT.. I have to admit.. whenever I find out that someone is a Republican.. I have to wonder if they fall into that category.. In other words.. MY personal trust level is pretty low.
 
And that goes true for the Republicans thinking about Democrats too. Only a third are Democrats, an other third go Republican and the remaining larger group.40%, goes independent and vote for those they trust the most at that election.
 
AZ Jim said:
[/B][/COLOR]

So it's your way that's the correct model for America? I have seen others with similar visions who gained the power to enforce their ideals in other places in other times. One of them in particular chose permanently eliminating millions of "losers" that didn't fit in with his grand scheme.
Click to expand...

Yes so right you are. And most were all out communist types or the far left socialist too. Not at all like the US Constitution would have us go.

Never in the US history of rational Democrats and Republicans were there any problems as you mention. At times the Democrats and Republicans ran as a joint party. That will never happen again as long as the democrats are under control of the far left liberals, socialist types, rather than true US constitutional types we really need to get this country out of such unusual debts and put the people and states back into charge as they once were. We are getting just as messed up as far too many of the European countries are.
 
BobF said:
Best look at what some of the liberals call the conservatives before asking this question. To me the liberals are the losers as far as the way the US is supposed to be living.
Click to expand...

There have been insulting names describing each party by both sides of the aisle. It's hard for some people not to do this, unfortunately. But let's remember the parties consist of American citizens who care about the future of this country, but they have different ideas about how to make the future better. The name calling should never be directed at particular members of this forum, and I think everyone's done a great job at not letting that happen.

We don't all agree, there is a great divide in this great country, I think it's best just to voice our opinions, give examples of why we think that way, give information/food for thought for others to read who may be uninformed, or on the fence politically.

By the way, this thread was merged with the exact same thread topic that was posted here last year, that's why there's so many replies suddenly.
 
BobF said:
Yes so right you are. And most were all out communist types or the far left socialist too. Not at all like the US Constitution would have us go.

Never in the US history of rational Democrats and Republicans were there any problems as you mention. At times the Democrats and Republicans ran as a joint party. That will never happen again as long as the democrats are under control of the far left liberals, socialist types, rather than true US constitutional types we really need to get this country out of such unusual debts and put the people and states back into charge as they once were. We are getting just as messed up as far too many of the European countries are.
Click to expand...

I thought you would understand I was referring to Germany and it's "decider" during the reign of terror from the thirties and well into the forties. As to the rest of your reply, it is a rambling personal opinion and riddled with the far right doctrine. I see no point in further participating in this thread
 
https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Democratic–Republican_Party.html

The Democratic-Republican Party or Republican Party was an American political party founded in the early 1790s by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Political scientists use the former name, while historians prefer the latter one; contemporaries generally called the party the "Republicans", along with many other names.
It was formed first in Congress and then in every state to contest elections and oppose the programs of Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson needed to have a nationwide party to counteract the Federalists, a nationwide party recently formed by Hamilton. Foreign affairs took a leading role in 1795 as the Republicans opposed the Jay Treaty with Britain (then at war with France) and supported good relations with revolutionary France (until Napoleon became a dictator after 1799). The party insisted on a strict construction of the Constitution, and denounced many of Hamilton's measures (especially the national bank) as unconstitutional. The party was strongest in the South and weakest in the Northeast; it favored states' rights and the primacy of the yeoman farmers and the planters over bankers, industrialists, merchants, and investors. The Jeffersonians were deeply committed to the principles of republicanism, which they feared were threatened by the supposed monarchical tendencies of the Federalists. The party came to power with the election of Jefferson in 1800. The Federalists—too elitist to appeal to most people—faded away, and the Republicans, despite internal divisions, dominated the First Party System until partisanship itself withered away after 1816.
 
AZ Jim said:
I thought you would understand I was referring to Germany and it's "decider" during the reign of terror from the thirties and well into the forties. As to the rest of your reply, it is a rambling personal opinion and riddled with the far right doctrine. I see no point in further participating in this thread
Click to expand...

I don't either Jim.... Politics was always a heated debate, but I don't recall it ever being as mean spirited and nasty as it is now.. It's turned into a real blood sport. That's a shame, because it used to be that we could get things done in this country.. there was compromise and debate in Washington.. Now, with this latest crop of GOP senators and congressmen, that is out the window.. and they have even admitted it. There is little hope of anything happening.. and the hatred and animosity runs rampant... That is quite evident in the way they treat our President. There is no respect and they are pretty open about it. YET... respect is something THEY think they are entitled to... fat chance.
 
GOP the problem? Hardly so. Our biggest problem is the President Obama who has chosen to run our government with his very own developed group of rules makers and enforcers that he himself has developed and for that he also convinced a non co operative Senate leader that would not offer Republican items to the Senate for debate or voting. The Obama Care stuff was all run in Democrat controlled operations and not allowed to be voted on by any Republicans that wanted changes. So what is wrong with our new Congress wanting to take in and debate the Obama care stuff to try to make it constitutional again.

I don't know why some folks have such wild and incorrect ideas about conservative folks. This country is made up of liberals and conservative, not political parties at all, just descriptive terms of how they prefer to act. Very loose about how to interpret things or more restrictive. More into the Constitution descriptions conservative or not so tight to the Constitution is more liberal.

In books, magazines, newspapers, speeches, these terms are used frequently. They are not a mystery to most.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top