And the family saying he was on the way to take his daughter skating for her birthday, while he was drunk?Every two to three weeks, there is another unarmed black guy getting killed by police. I don't believe this is necessarily a primarily racially motivated occurrence. Black guy kills a black guy = nobody cares. White guy kills a white guy=, again, nobody cares. Cop kills a black guy= riots. Sounds like racism, but police kill way more whites than blacks. I don't know the circumstance for cop on white killings, but I assume they are pretty much the same for blacks. So, if some cop on black killings are questionable, then some cop on white killings are also questionable. To me, that signifies that there is a generic problem with police procedures, and practice. In a recent cop on black killing, police surrounded a car with a black driver. The police were on the other side of the car's windows, they shouted "He got a gun. He got a gun". They could plainly see all he had was a phone in his hands. It was pure cover your ass. It points to that cowboy, shoot em up attitude.
I'm not denying racism. I couldn't remember the driver's name from above, but when I googled "white cop kills blacks", there were just so many names, I couldn't wade through them all. And I do believe being a police officer is extremely dangerous profession. And that's what some lack, professionalism.
Also, by now,the two officers should have been able to handle a drunk. He's obviously intoxicated. He should have been arrested, cuffed, and on his way to jail, right after they determined he was drunk.
i must agree if two officers with tazers cant restrain a drunk then they should hand in their papers, also why cant a trained police officer hit a fleeing man in the legs from ten yards, surely their ability to use their weapons must be tested before they are issued to them...Every two to three weeks, there is another unarmed black guy getting killed by police. I don't believe this is necessarily a primarily racially motivated occurrence. Black guy kills a black guy = nobody cares. White guy kills a white guy=, again, nobody cares. Cop kills a black guy= riots. Sounds like racism, but police kill way more whites than blacks. I don't know the circumstance for cop on white killings, but I assume they are pretty much the same for blacks. So, if some cop on black killings are questionable, then some cop on white killings are also questionable. To me, that signifies that there is a generic problem with police procedures, and practice. In a recent cop on black killing, police surrounded a car with a black driver. The police were on the other side of the car's windows, they shouted "He got a gun. He got a gun". They could plainly see all he had was a phone in his hands. It was pure cover your ass. It points to that cowboy, shoot em up attitude.
I'm not denying racism. I couldn't remember the driver's name from above, but when I googled "white cop kills blacks", there were just so many names, I couldn't wade through them all. And I do believe being a police officer is extremely dangerous profession. And that's what some lack, professionalism.
Also, by now,the two officers should have been able to handle a drunk. He's obviously intoxicated. He should have been arrested, cuffed, and on his way to jail, right after they determined he was drunk.
I have a different point of view of this thread.
Yup, I don’t follow the herd screaming how I deeply I care about people who have black skin.Surprised ...not.![]()
I guess you could compare it to a baseball major league pitcher who makes millions of dollars, trains a lot, yet manages to throw balls that walk players or create fouls that players hit. You can not win them all.i must agree if two officers with tazers cant restrain a drunk then they should hand in their papers, also why cant a trained police officer hit a fleeing man in the legs from ten yards, surely their ability to use their weapons must be tested before they are issued to them...
OK, I googled, and found the following:
https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/
It says in 2019, blacks were 24% of the number of people killed by police, despite being 13% of the population.
I don't mean to be petty when this thread is so very serious, But:Or a thread about how black people, for the most part, don‘t adopt black children or participate in foster care as much as white people?
This isn’t always the case. I am not a geneticist or even know a lot about the human anatomy, but for whatever reason, some people gain strength from drinking. Of course, if the drunk is completely sf, then it’s a different story. After all, alcohol is a depressant. I have seen men with half a load on that could probably lift the backend of a car. Others may not be able to lift a newspaper.Every two to three weeks, there is another unarmed black guy getting killed by police. I don't believe this is necessarily a primarily racially motivated occurrence. Black guy kills a black guy = nobody cares. White guy kills a white guy=, again, nobody cares. Cop kills a black guy= riots. Sounds like racism, but police kill way more whites than blacks. I don't know the circumstance for cop on white killings, but I assume they are pretty much the same for blacks. So, if some cop on black killings are questionable, then some cop on white killings are also questionable. To me, that signifies that there is a generic problem with police procedures, and practice. In a recent cop on black killing, police surrounded a car with a black driver. The police were on the other side of the car's windows, they shouted "He got a gun. He got a gun". They could plainly see all he had was a phone in his hands. It was pure cover your ass. It points to that cowboy, shoot em up attitude.
I'm not denying racism. I couldn't remember the driver's name from above, but when I googled "white cop kills blacks", there were just so many names, I couldn't wade through them all. And I do believe being a police officer is extremely dangerous profession. And that's what some lack, professionalism.
Also, by now,the two officers should have been able to handle a drunk. He's obviously intoxicated. He should have been arrested, cuffed, and on his way to jail, right after they determined he was drunk.
Can the officers not stop a threat without killing the person? Shoot them in the legs, butt, arm etc?When an officer is in pursuit and is shot at, his only objective is to then to stop the threat.
The cops had his car. They knew who he was. They knew where to find him. Shooting him for sleeping off booze is (fill in the blank)Can the officers not stop a threat without killing the person? Shoot them in the legs, butt, arm etc?
Overkill?Shooting him for sleeping off booze is (fill in the blank)
Yup, I don’t follow the herd screaming how I deeply I care about people who have black skin.
Thank you. You’re far better at expressing words for others to understand than I am. Nothing wrong with caring deeply for others when they need it most no matter what colour. It’s a loving human trait which ‘most’ can relate to.Not in a herd, sweetie. Just do care deeply about a lot of people who have black skin. OneEyedDiva happens to be one here and I respect the pain she felt in compiling the information for the post. I can't pretend to say I know how she feels, but I can say I hurt for her hurts. In real life there's Jessica, Maggie, Kenyata, Jaleel, Mac, Sylvester (x2), Yolanda (x2), Lou Ida, Cierra, Cameron, Fannie, Lola, Jamella, Lucy, Rick to name those I care the most for. If any one of these friends called me up and asked me to stand with them peacefully, I would do it in a heartbeat.
I agree. It depends on locality.I don't mean to be petty when this thread is so very serious, But:
It depends on locality. I worked in adoption and foster care for years in New York City and only a tiny percentage of our foster parents, many of whom adopted their kids, were something other than black. Just FYI. I'll bet the same is true in Chicago and most other large urban areas.
Shooting him for sleeping off booze is murder. Shooting him for violently resisting arrest, stealing an officer's Taser and trying to use it on said officer is probably not murder in the legal sense. They are calling it "lawful but awful" and that sounds about right.The cops had his car. They knew who he was. They knew where to find him. Shooting him for sleeping off booze is (fill in the blank)
That's not realistic. It's hard to hit a moving target under any circumstances. Throw in nighttime, adrenaline, etc. and aiming at an arm or a leg is impossible.Can the officers not stop a threat without killing the person? Shoot them in the legs, butt, arm etc?