Prince Harry won't allow selfies with people! Should he?

Camilla for Queen!
 

Ralphy1 said:
See if you ever invited to the palace!
Click to expand...

Which one? They have MANY palaces and castles. And no jobs. Oh, forgot...they are supposed to be good for tourism. Supposedly Americans won't want to come visit here if there are no royals. Nothing here to attract anyone except a royal family. Uh huh.
 
Now I feel compelled to tell you that I am really Sir Ralphy, per order of the Queen, and, therefore, I will expect more respect here from now on...
 
Ameriscot said:
No, she wasn't innocent. She was naive and in love and a girl of 19. I can overlook her bad behaviour because she went through hell with Charles and she felt trapped. Yes, she had affairs but so did he. And she did a lot of good things once she was on her own.
Click to expand...

Diana also knew that Charles wasn't in love with her, if it wasn't for the interference of the Queen Mother and her grandmother, they would never have got married but the Queen Mother was worried that Charles wasn't producing an heir to the throne...............Charles has also done a lot of good things but he wasn't/isn't so manipulative as Diana was..............................there are always two sides to a story.
 
Bee said:
Diana also knew that Charles wasn't in love with her, if it wasn't for the interference of the Queen Mother and her grandmother, they would never have got married but the Queen Mother was worried that Charles wasn't producing an heir to the throne...............Charles has also done a lot of good things but he wasn't/isn't so manipulative as Diana was..............................there are always two sides to a story.
Click to expand...

She was in love with him and was hoping it would be returned. Diana had issues from her childhood and then a bad marriage and bulimia and she can't be totally blamed for her behaviour. Sure, Charles has done some good things, but he is not a likable man and he sticks his nose in where it doesn't belong. If he wants to be a politician, then he should give up his title and run for office.
 
Annie, I don't know Charles political views, is he elitist and old fashioned, except for environmental issues? Why isn't he likable, apart from suffering from an extreme case of rectal-cranial inversion? Q.S. stop laughing! Lol.
 
Shalimar said:
Annie, I don't know Charles political views, is he elitist and old fashioned, except for environmental issues? Why isn't he likable, apart from suffering from an extreme case of rectal-cranial inversion? Q.S. stop laughing! Lol.
Click to expand...

He writes a lot of letters to the MPs in parliament and tells them what he thinks they should do. Except for the weekly meeting between the Queen and the Prime Minister, the royals are supposed to keep their noses out of politics. They have no political power, although I think the Queen can break a tie or something.

Aye, cranial-rectal inversion. Well said! He is very much into environmental issues, however, I saw him once at the train station in Glasgow talking about his green agenda. He had come to Scotland on a green energy train which had about 8 cars, from London - long trip. And there were only 6 or 7 people on the entire train.
 
QuickSilver said:
Imagine the narrow life he has led. How out of touch he probably is, and I imagine he is pretty bored.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter how rich or privileged they are, I wouldn't want to have been born into that life. You have no freedom and no choices as to what to do with your life. Always in the spotlight.

Don't think he's bored as he has his polo, and his environmental projects, and free travel when he gives little speeches somewhere. They do raise money for charity. But he's go so many different residences, if he gets bored he can go to another. And of course Camilla entertains him. :p
 
Diana was a very good mother and wanted her boys to have a taste of normal life. Even Charles admitted she was a good mother. She did a good job because they seem to be more in touch with the real world than the rest of them. They love Africa and being among people who haven't a clue who they are.
 
Ameriscot said:
She was in love with him and was hoping it would be returned. Diana had issues from her childhood and then a bad marriage and bulimia and she can't be totally blamed for her behaviour. Sure, Charles has done some good things, but he is not a likable man and he sticks his nose in where it doesn't belong. If he wants to be a politician, then he should give up his title and run for office.
Click to expand...

You have your opinion and I have mine, and mine is that I would much prefer Charles and Camilla to a manipulative Diana, who knew exactly how to manipulate the press and the public.
 
If anyone had seen the encounter live , he simply told some youngsters, jokingly, that selfies were bad for them, much as he would too much chocolate or ice cream.

As for Camilla, I hope I live long enough to have her as Queen Consort. Much more suitable for the post than that other blonde bimbo he got mixed up with.

He's not the first young man to be led up the garden path by a leggy blonde, and he won't be the last, but Camilla is a good steadying hand, on both him and the boys.
 
Well, I've done some speculative calculating. If we suppose that the Queen and the three people currently in line to the throne each live to be 100 (I believe the Queen Mother lived past 100), it will go like this:

The Queen will live until 2026
Charles will ascend at age 78 and live until 2048
William will ascend at age 66 and live until 2082
George will ascend at age 69 and live until 2113
And on it goes. :king:
 
It might be a good idea to not allow selfies as anyone with such a picture could make allegations, perhaps he was advised to do so.

I'm not a royalist, but I do like the two boys. Not keen on Charles or Camilla and the rest. But it's interesting how much Diana was loved and the deep grief response of people all over the world when she died.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top