Reid waiting for Boehner to pass clean DHS funding bill..

QuickSilver

SF VIP
Location
Midwest
In an unprecidented show of solidarity, Senate Dems reject McConnell's offer of a clean bill to fund NHS... Reid says Senate Democrats will NOT vote on one until Boehner passes it in the HOUSE.... If NHS shuts down.... Boehner will own it. Come on Johnny.... How does it feel to be on the hot seat?

http://politicalwire.com/2015/02/24/reid-wont-move-on-funding-bill-until-boehner-caves/
 

All we use to hear for Dirty Harry was that if the repubs didn't like something they should "submit their own bill"

OK, time to put up or shut up Harrry.

Gene
 
Boehner is waiting for Obama to obey the law and the constitution.

When the Republicans were filibustering you liberals all whined that Republicans were obstructing congress. Now that the Democrats are filibustering you whine that the Republicans are obstructing congress.

Your prejudices are showing.
 
Boehner is waiting for Obama to obey the law and the constitution.

When the Republicans were filibustering you liberals all whined that Republicans were obstructing congress. Now that the Democrats are filibustering you whine that the Republicans are obstructing congress.

Your prejudices are showing.

Waza matter? Doesn't the medicine taste very good? Poor babies.. It's clear.. why should Democrats in the Senate waste time passing a clean funding bill for the DHS... knowing full well that Boehner can't or WON'T let it pass the house? What purpose will that serve? Can you explain... I'm sure if Boehner came across with a clean bill.. without the goofy amendments added.. the Senate would pass it in a heartbeat and it would end up on the Presidents desk. AND he would sign it. It can't without Boehner.. HE is the hold up.. AND the obstructionist.
 
majority_zpsljntuwlg.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 
The US Senate has passed a "clean" bill to fund the DHS for a further 3 weeks and the bill has been rejected by the House.

House Fails to Approve Funds for Homeland Security

By ASHLEY PARKERFEB. 27, 2015

WASHINGTON — Republicans vowing to govern effectively as a congressional majority failed a fundamental test Friday evening, when House leaders could not pass a temporary measure to avert a partial shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security, leaving lawmakers scrambling for a solution before money was to run out at midnight.

In a stunning and humiliating setback for Speaker John A. Boehner and his leadership team, the House voted 224 to 203 against their plan to extend funding for the department for three weeks. The bill was defeated during a tense evening vote on the House floor, despite leadership optimism that, after a day of arm-twisting behind the scenes, they had the muscle to win a narrow victory.

The defeat for House Republican leaders came after the Senate passed its own legislation in the morning to fund the department through the fiscal year — even though senators fully expected the House to pass their own temporary three-week measure. In the aftermath of the vote, the House Republican leadership team huddled to come up with a new approach, but its options were limited given the deep rebellion by its more conservative members against supporting anything that does not halt President Obama’s immigration policies. The original legislation passed by the House essentially gutted those policies.

At one point, as the legislation stalled, Mr. Boehner walked wordlessly from the chamber, his head down. Friday’s crisis represented a perilous situation for the speaker, who has since taking control of the House in 2011 struggled to unite his fractious rank-and-file on spending and policy issues.
Mr. Boehner wants to avoid a shutdown for which he knows Republicans will be blamed, but he cannot risk getting out too far ahead of his conservative members, who are dug in against the president.

For Mr. Boehner, said Representative Steve Israel of New York, a Democratic leader, “Homeland Security is the security of his gavel, and tonight it’s less secure.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, in a statement called on House Republicans to pass the Senate’s funding bill. “The Republican congress has shown that it simply cannot govern,” Mr. Reid said. “Two months into the Republican congress, we are already staring a Homeland Security shutdown square in the face, even as terrorists around the world threaten to strike America.”

The impasse over the Homeland Security agency reflects a broader fight in Congress over President Obama’s immigration policies. Republicans are trying to attach restrictions on Mr. Obama’s executive action on immigration to the department’s funding measure.

But it also exposed deep rifts between House and Senate Republicans, who struggled in recent weeks to agree on a pragmatic path forward to both keep the agency running and express their displeasure with the president’s recent immigration action.

“We should have never fought this battle,” said Senator Mark S. Kirk, Republican of Illinois. “In my view, in the long run, if you are blessed with the majority, you are blessed with the power to govern. If you’re going to govern, you have to act responsibly.”

After the Republicans gained control of the Senate and increased their margins in the House in the November elections, both Mr. Boehner and Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, promised to reverse Congress’s pattern of hurtling from crisis to crisis, even over matters like appropriations that were once relatively routine.

But in their first big test, the Republican leaders often seemed to be working from different playbooks, at times verging on hostility, with each saying it was time for the other chamber to act. The fight over the Homeland Security funding — coupled with a separate revolt by House conservatives — also upended Republican plans to overhaul No Child Left Behind, the 2001 education law that was a signature domestic achievement of President George W. Bush.

Republican leadership had expected to pass a new bill Friday to drastically reduce the role of federal government in public education, setting up a confrontation with Mr. Obama, who has threatened a veto. But the vote was put off after Heritage Action, the conservative advocacy group, waged a campaign against the measure, saying it does not do enough to limit Washington’s authority.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/28/us/senate-house-homeland-security.html?_r=0

What do the voters think about this situation? Why does America seem to be at war with itself at a time when outside threats present real and present danger?
 
The US Senate has passed a "clean" bill to fund the DHS for a further 3 weeks and the bill has been rejected by the House.



What do the voters think about this situation? Why does America seem to be at war with itself at a time when outside threats present real and present danger?


Not quite accurate... The Senate passed a clean funding bill for DHS to the end of the fiscal year.. Boehner would NOT bring it to a vote in the House... However put out a clean funding bill to fund the DHS for only 3 weeks... It also failed, but for two reasons.. Hardline Teaparty conservatives voted against it because it didn't negate President Obama's executive order on immigration... and the Democrats voted against it because it was only for 3 weeks.. SO now Boehner has a decision to make.. Does he bring forward the Senate bill? and possibley be voted out of his speakership.. Or does he try to get the Teaparty to agree to something else.... possibley a bill to fund DHS for only 7 days.. Democrats say they will not vote for that. It's a mess.... So far the GOP is REALLY showing how well they can govern aren't they?
 
Just in.... the Senate just passed a clean funding bill to fund DHS for only 1 week... and then McConnell adjourned the Senate until monday. Now Speaker Boehner has a choice... the clock is ticking..
 
Our parliament is a shambles at the moment too.
It will probably cost the Prime Minister his job very soon because it is apparent that he has lost the confidence of his parliamentary party.
It is only a matter of time before a leadership challenge is mounted.

He promised several things that he has not delivered - "the grown ups are now in charge" being the most obvious thing that is lacking.

Can the House or Senate leaders be challenged by someone else from their party if they are not working out?
 
So.... NOW..... Here's the deal... Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has sent a letter to House Democrats to vote in favor of the one week clean funding bill... and Boehner says he will bring the full fiscal year clean bill to the Floor for a vote next week.. And Democrats will help to get it passed. proving to Boehner, that he NEEDS the help of Democrats to get anything passed..
 
The US Senate has passed a "clean" bill to fund the DHS for a further 3 weeks and the bill has been rejected by the House.



What do the voters think about this situation? Why does America seem to be at war with itself at a time when outside threats present real and present danger?

Gads, you hit the nail on the head again DW, I wonder the same thing. I don't care what people's politics are but are we meant to fight against each other or compromise.
 
I hate it when members of one party refer to the other party as "the enemy". They are political opponents, not enemies. I want to give them a slap on the wrist and tell them that Australians are not and should not be at war with each other. The politicians are given the privilege of serving the nation and its people, and are not put there to destroy and demolish each other. I know I'm being idealistic but without an ideal to aspire to, what are we ever going to achieve?
 
No, Jim, not on this forum but it's often heard over here when the Coalition is referring to the Labor party. I haven't heard it, in public at least, from Labor when referring to the Coalition. I arc up when I hear this kind of language used because it is so unwarranted.
 


Back
Top