That was about the time that I, as a true scientist, changed from an atheist to an agnostic. To be an atheist (assertively) one has to have the proof that the deity does not exist. That simply cannot happen.
I went along with you, CAK, until I got to that sentence. To deny that something exists, one does not have to prove that it doesn't exist. You can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is on the one making the assertion that something does exist.
Otherwise, we are in la-la land.
"I believe in the tooth fairy."
"But why? Do you have any objective proof?"
"Well, no, but you don't have any proof that she doesn't exist either."
For many years, I also called myself an agnostic, but finally decided that that was a copout. It was a timid concession that absolutely any religious scenario might exist, just because somebody said it did. So I decided that if I don't believe it, I don't believe it, and it was time to be true to my own convictions.