San Francisco boycotts over half of the USA.

I would think a lot of these laws might not stand a constitutional test. As I understand it the Commerce Clause gives Congress pretty much the exclusive right to regulate trade between states. Don't know if they have been so tested.
Since the Interstate Commerce Commission is operative, if there have been challenges to the Constitutionality of its Enactment, they have failed. Have certain provisions been ruled upon and stricken, yes, such as:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Lopez
 

I like visiting San Francisco, and will continue to, their eccentricities are part of the attraction. No matter how foolish I think some of them are.
I live a few miles from San Francisco and am reluctant to visit. San Francisco has experienced as many as 3000 car break-ins in a month. Areas frequented by tourists are the worst. Never leave a package or bag visible in your parked car, or it’s likely to be smash and grab.
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisc...uto-burglary-car-break-in-its-out-of-control/
 
SF is setting the correct tone...mess with women's rights and we'll do business elsewhere. What's not to like about this stance?
 

It seems that San Francisco prohibits the city government from doing business with companies whose US headquarters are in state that do things the Frisco disapproves of. A total of 28 states are on the list.

I find this attitude to be extremely hypocritical considering that SF gets its water supply by damming Yosemtie National Park. As far as I know SF is the only city that ever dammed a USA national park to get its water.
I wonder why NJ missed the cut on this one?
 

Back
Top