She's BAAAACK !!!!!!

Dame Warrigal, the whistle blower was her friend, Linda Tripp. BTW, Miss Monica had a five-year affair with a married man before she went to the White House.

Denise, she's made plenty of money. By her account, it all went to pay legal fees. Huh? What legal fees? I'm not aware that anybody sued her over her misadventures.

Oh, Denise? Your choice of words..."blowing" a good deal and "she blew it"....well, yes, actually, she did! LOL
 

GeorgiaXplant said:
Dame Warrigal, the whistle blower was her friend, Linda Tripp. BTW, Miss Monica had a five-year affair with a married man before she went to the White House.

Denise, she's made plenty of money. By her account, it all went to pay legal fees. Huh? What legal fees? I'm not aware that anybody sued her over her misadventures.

Oh, Denise? Your choice of words..."blowing" a good deal and "she blew it"....well, yes, actually, she did! LOL
Click to expand...

LOLLLLLLL!! Georgia, yes, she did! :lofl::clap:
 
I have no sympathy for her, she knew what she was doing at the time, and I also fault Clinton for not being able to control himself during his presidency, especially not just taking it anywhere out of the white house, take her to a hotel, back seat of a limo, I'm sure she would have been eager.

She seems to be the one holding onto this scandal for her own gain, she likes to be in the spotlight IMO. Can't get a job? I don't know, as I haven't had any interest in following her life, but I know she's done a few things, and is certainly not hurting for money. It's not like she was applying at Red Lobster, and they were shunning her. She could have just walked away and let this whole thing die down...but she chose not to. Personally, I'm tired of hearing the name. :rolleyes:
 

nwlady said:
Oh so true, she is responsible for her own actions. If she wouldn't have had an meetup with Mr. Pres. she wouldn't have had any of this happen. Can't agree with you more Phil.
Click to expand...


I'll bet if we all put our thinking caps on, we can remember at least one really dumb thing we did when we were 22. For example this site says that the adolescent brain is maturing well into our twenties. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892678/

So what she allowed herself to get pulled into was the result of immature decision making processes. He was the 'mature' adult and should have known better.
 
Debby said:
I'll bet if we all put our thinking caps on, we can remember at least one really dumb thing we did when we were 22. For example this site says that the adolescent brain is maturing well into our twenties. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892678/

So what she allowed herself to get pulled into was the result of immature decision making processes. He was the 'mature' adult and should have known better.
Click to expand...

Yes, he being the adult, and a position of power that you would think called for a fully-developed brain, that is true, he also made a bad decision. What Monica did afterwards is more of a reflection on her "brain". She continues to blame others for what she should now be admitting her part in the fault.
 
I agree with Nwlady, we may have made stupid mistakes in our twenties, but we're not profiting from it by writing books and being in the spotlight for years afterwards, playing the victim. That's the difference there, what did she make $12 mil from her book, wonder what she made for her Barbara Walters interview, and all of her speeches. She's a smart cookie, not a victim at all.
 
The day comes when we decide that it no longer serves us to blame our parents, our family, our boss, our circumstances or anyone or anything else and we decide it’s time to move forward simply because we’re worth it. And that’s the day, despite our circumstances, that we begin to discover just how powerful we really are.

by Paul Boynton

1947694_10152109813666647_566096839_n.jpg
 
I'm lookin at it NOT as her wanting to profit, but she is standing up to cyberbullying..... and using her experience to inspire others. I don't think anyone can refute the fact that she WAS bullied following the incident. She is speaking for a cause... and guess what... she is being cyberbullied again.
 
There's an easy cure for cyberbullying.

Throw away your smart phone and shut down all of your social media accounts. Get rid of your email. Don't read anything in the forums.

Voila - no more cyberbullying. And now you'll have a lot more time to get a life.
 
Hmmm, an affair with a married man who was the most powerful man in the world at the time. Yeah right no one should pay attention or ignore here. Oh puhlease...

That being said was the affair itself over blown, in some respects but again affair involving the most powerful man in the world. What if she were a spy or wack job stalker.

Also, just a side note by coincidence the movie Kill The Messenger is about Gary Webb who shed more light on government drug dealing. Some speculate that the affair was purposely put front and center to draw attention away from government sanctioned drug dealing through multiple administrations AND wild Bill being governor of a state that was a major player in government sanctioned or enabled drug dealing. Just by coincidence.
 
QuickSilver said:
When in doubt?...... insert a conspiracy theory..
Click to expand...

Absolutely! Politics is a highly calculated and orchestrated show for the public. Sure the conservatives wanted Bill out of there and some even smelled blood hoping pressure would force a resignation but this affair devoured time and news resources. By the time the Lewinsky scandal broke theoretically we should've been in the middle of congressional hearings and/or trials regarding government enabled drug dealing. Major media at the time told their staffs get/discredit the author, any thing you want in they way of staff and money you got. It was obvious they didn't want that story gaining attention or credibility. I'm not saying Lewinsky was a plant but "leaks" of information usually have a purpose and plan to follow.

All I can say is look at all the issues, events and legislation that was going simultaneously with hearings and impeachment proceedings. I doubt the CIA and drugs were the only thing they wanted attention diverted away from.
 
WhatInThe said:
Absolutely! Politics is a highly calculated and orchestrated show for the public. Sure the conservatives wanted Bill out of there and some even smelled blood hoping pressure would force a resignation but this affair devoured time and news resources. By the time the Lewinsky scandal broke theoretically we should've been in the middle of congressional hearings and/or trials regarding government enabled drug dealing. Major media at the time told their staffs get/discredit the author, any thing you want in they way of staff and money you got. It was obvious they didn't want that story gaining attention or credibility. I'm not saying Lewinsky was a plant but "leaks" of information usually have a purpose and plan to follow.

All I can say is look at all the issues, events and legislation that was going simultaneously with hearings and impeachment proceedings. I doubt the CIA and drugs were the only thing they wanted attention diverted away from.
Click to expand...

Too bad the whole thing backfired big time on the GOP.. Newt Gingrich was ousted, Bill remained in office and they lost control of the House and Senate.
 
QuickSilver said:
Too bad the whole thing backfired big time on the GOP.. Newt Gingrich was ousted, Bill re-elected and they lost control of the House and Senate.
Click to expand...

One of the things that surprised me from both the Dems and Reps was that how both let the position of president get besmirched and degraded. Even if the conservatives got their way it would've opened the door to force all future presidents out for non political issues. It's also just one of many reasons Bush got ransacked by major media during his administration.
 
Look how the "IMPEACH" cry has haunted the Obama presidency... from the day he was Inaugerated in 2009. Of course there are no grounds... But even if it were attempted, they need 2/3 of the Senate to convict.. What a lot of folks don't seem to understand is that impeachment is not removal from office.. So the spectacle would be nothing more than political theater and a waste of taxpayer money.. while they COULD be doing some real governing.
 
In her defense in this case anyway apparently she was treated like a hardcore felon by the FBI during a contentious 12 hour interview without a lawyer. She was told if she didn't lawyer up they would be easier on her. Now it appears she made this decision voluntarily but to threaten a witness like that over an affair is a bit much. And if she did lie in a lawsuit, not a criminal trial they would eventually get the proof they wanted anyway. I'll admit the whole process was fast tracked to get wild Bill out of office.

http://pagesix.com/2014/10/24/monic...urself/?_ga=1.249728454.1361957937.1410879721
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top