Tattoos have been linked to a deadly type of blood cancer for the first time.

[Sunny]

I've never understood what the appeal is. I think they're a kind of body mutilation, possibly dangerous, not at all beautiful, and kind of barbaric.
My grandson (no tattoos that I know of) had a long term relationship with a young woman who was otherwise gorgeous, but her whole arm was covered in a tattoo. I thought it spoiled her looks. (Kept my opinion to myself.) They eventually broke up, though I doubt that the tattooss had anything to do with it.

 

[hollydolly]

I’m not against at such, I just don’t like the way they look, don’t have one and will never get one. It’s like walking around with doodles or graffiti on your body. Whatever you choose will get tiresome to see eventually and I just am not an exhibitionist.

I have said this so many times. If they can't live your life without a picture of an Eagle..or a skull .a dagger ..or a bunch of roses.. ..or god forbid someone's name... then carry a picture around in your pocket...

 

[January]

I have said this so many times. If they can't live your life without a picture of an Eagle..or a skull .a dagger ..or a bunch of roses.. ..or god forbid someone's name... then carry a picture around in your pocket...

Or get a tattoo if that is what they want to do. it isn't that they can't live their life without it, it is just something they choose to do.

I get that you don't, and I don't have any tattoos either - but if people want to get one and not carry a picture in their pocket then that is fine too.