Yes, there have been some notable rulings related to artificial intelligence (AI) by the Supreme Court. Here are a few:
Copyright for AI-Generated Works:
In a ruling by Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, it was determined that AI cannot hold copyright for works it creates entirely without human involvement. The case involved computer scientist Stephen Thaler’s attempt to get a copyright for a piece of visual art titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” which was autonomously created by his AI system called the “Creativity Machine.” The court upheld the principle that human authorship is a bedrock requirement for copyright, and since the machine-created artwork couldn’t be copyrighted, the issue of transferring the copyright was moot.
Similarly, the UK Supreme Court confirmed that an inventor must be a person, and an AI cannot be named as an inventor to secure patent rights.
AI Regulation and the Major Questions Doctrine:
The Supreme Court’s “major questions doctrine” could impact AI regulation. This doctrine nullifies administrative actions that lack clear congressional authorization when dealing with decisions of significant economic and political importance. Any effort by Congress or the White House to regulate AI may be subject to this doctrine.
Remember that these rulings are just a few examples, and the legal landscape around AI continues to evolve. If you have any specific questions or need further information, feel free to ask!
That's what Ai said.
I can easily surmise that with time the judges will get bought out and Ai will be superb being & entitled ! You know they will be following Ai
lists of laws and stuff like that.
Exploring all the possibilities is so tiring right now. Even Ai judges are a logical summation of events to come....
