VaughanJB
Scrappy VIP
No way will I be doing any such research.
I'm not interested in going down this avenue.
I don't blame you. I only pointed it out to illustrate that being a signatory to UNDHR, 1948 doesn't mean a whole lot.
No way will I be doing any such research.
I'm not interested in going down this avenue.
That neatly sidesteps the the old adage of a a fair day's pay for a fair day's work.The best way to earn more is to improve you skill level. I know a lot of people that has worked for.
Well, it's true... sometimes one's dreams are impossible. On the other hand, when I was a teenager doing paid work I know what I was paid in my first years was significantly below whatever "minimum wage" may have been. Was I cheated? I don't think so, I was just getting my feet wet in the world of work.Sometimes one's dreams are impossible. That's better than cheating a worker.
It doesn't mean a lot but it is an indicator of the prevailing attitude towards industrial relations. I think that we're aware of a certain corporation which shut down a franchise that wanted to become unionised.I don't blame you. I only pointed it out to illustrate that being a signatory to UNDHR, 1948 doesn't mean a whole lot.
Where is this?A minimum wage of not less than $4.25 may be paid to employees under age 20 for their first 90 consecutive calendar days
Where is this?
Maybe deciding if a job at a fast food place is meant to be a living wage as defined.
What is the UN definition of a living wage?
The International Labour Organization has just agreed a formal definition for a living wage and endorsed living wage policies. Living wages aim to give workers a decent standard of living and enough pay to afford basic needs like food and housing.Apr 9, 2024
Or an entry level job
What does entry level mean? Entry level is a type of job that typically requires minimal education, training and experience. Entry-level jobs are available in every industry.
My view
An entry level job that can be replaced by robotics should be a clue as to the value of the cost of labor.
I don't think this is about NOT paying a minimum wage. I think it's about weather or not the $20.00 min wage set by the state is negativly impacting jobs. The article in the Op's post cited no problem with closings or job loss from Jan. to Mar. A little deceiving since the $20.00 increase didn't start until April.By definition, paying less than minimum wage means it's not enough to live on, that's not useful in the big picture.
I don't think this is about NOT paying a minimum wage. I think it's about weather or not the $20.00 min wage set by the state is negativly impacting jobs.
Age 21 or over (National Living Wage) | £11.44 |
Age 18 to 20 | £8.60 |
Under 18 | £6.40 |
Apprentice | £6.40 |
For the well-heeled it's not about outrunning the bear, they just need to outrun you. So they push for elevated wages at the bottom as they push for higher prices. The whole idea is to suppress the middle class while buying political power through bread and circuses doled out to the working poor they've duped.
And the question of who or what decides what is fair has to be addressed.That neatly sidesteps the the old adage of a a fair day's pay for a fair day's work.
QuoteWe disagree, I guess. For me, if it negatively impacts jobs, then there were too many jobs out there that didn't allow people to live a minimal existence.
The union chief ignores the idea that conversion to robotics so the cost to manufacture more at less cost to get a better profit is what capitalism is about. Car manufacturing plant employees are minimal relative to the buying public.There is a Story about GM building a new mechanized car factory full of robotics. The factory manager takes the Union chief on a tour of the new factory and tells him that none of the robots take sick days, show up drunk, need vacations, or require holiday pay. Yet they produce more cars, better made, at a lower cost. The union chief remarks that the robots don’t buy cars. That dilemma is at the heart of the matter in regards to things like the minimum wage.
Quote
"If it negatively impacts jobs then there were to many jobs that don't allow to live a minimal existence"
I don't understand the logic in that.
Is your solution to reduce jobs?
I took the lowest federal min wage @7.25an American worker @40hr work week before taxes earns $290.00. I'm not suggesting the wage in India be the wage paid if those jobs are brought back to America. What I'm suggesting. Wages set by the employer should allow for the employer to earn a profit.We know that there are people in India earning very little in various manufacturing jobs. The average salary for workers in manufacturing there is $165 a month. Are you suggesting that these jobs should be brought back to the US? If so, how could that work? That's not a job, it's slavery.
That's true but it usually costs money to improve skill level. people who are earning very low wages rarely have money leftover for trade schools or colleges and sometimes they don't even have money for transportation to those schools.The best way to earn more is to improve you skill level. I know a lot of people that has worked for. More later. Right now I have to make breakfast. I refuse to pay 5x more to get it at a fast food place.