Unrequited

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am sorry I posted this. You people have a broad and pro female definition of harassment, just as I expected. That is what the feministS and liberals have programmed America and Europe to think.including you.. I have read enough of these posts to see that some of you are narrow minded and very thin skinned. Get over it. If I say happy new year to someone and
they do not care for me, nothing wrong with that. As Aurora said, free speech still means something legally and morally, even if the liberals and conventional political correctness opposes it
. I have no intention of bothering anyone, never did. By your way of thinking salespeople harass many people every day.
This thread is closed IMO.
 

Well said AZJim.. They are grasping @ straws. AND, notice that they are in the minority of the other posters.

He'd be better off playing with his cat.
 

What sort of response did you expect Victor? You gave very sketchy details that basically told us that a male was refusing to heed a request from a married woman to leave her alone. If you're interested in forming an attachment with a female there are plenty of dating sites.
 
Certainly freedom of speech is a right, but only in so far that it's not causing undue distress to another person , particularity a person who has asked for no contact ....and in particular this situation where a single man feels it's his right to demand communication with a married woman who has expressed ''no desire' to speak to him!!

very , very odd way of thinking IMO...and clearly I'm in the majority!!

I totally agree!
 
Why is it so important to be "in the majority"? imp

Edit: Another imp "imponderable"
 
Last edited:
Life is short....one never knows if it is their last day.....to waste precious time/life on anyone who is not interested is just stupid.
 
I am sorry I posted this. You people have a broad and pro female definition of harassment, just as I expected. That is what the feministS and liberals have programmed America and Europe to think.including you.. I have read enough of these posts to see that some of you are narrow minded and very thin skinned. Get over it. If I say happy new year to someone and
they do not care for me, nothing wrong with that. As Aurora said, free speech still means something legally and morally, even if the liberals and conventional political correctness opposes it
. I have no intention of bothering anyone, never did. By your way of thinking salespeople harass many people every day.
This thread is closed IMO.

So, this thread was just bait, and not an earnest attempt at conversation.

Very cheesy! It's too bad that some people have so little self-awareness, that they can't even recognize their own motivations for doing something, or the degree to which they are committing a deceptive act.
 
I am wondering what the OP hoped to achieve in posting this thread. Was he truly hoping to be comforted over being rejected online by a woman who clearly saw his behaviour as unwelcome and intrusive? Is it likely to be that out of touch? As for the

accusation of a pro female stance, at least one poster commented that this stalker like behaviour would apply to either gender. Liberal? I think many conservatives would be very concerned with such abuse of the Internet. This individual seems to have no

empathy for the obvious distress this woman is experiencing over his advances, and that is what they are, regardless of whatever soft soap currently is being applied. In my book, if you like someone much, you place their needs and feelings

above your own where it is appropriate. Not to do so is, at the very least selfish, at the max, pathological.
 
Gender doesn't enter into it at all. Nobody has to have a relationship with anyone else, online or otherwise, and of whatever type, that they don't want to have. And if someone tries to force a relationship of any kind on an unwilling party, that's harassment in my book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top