Paco Dennis
SF VIP
- Location
- Mid-Missouri
While it's clear that "2001: A Space Odyssey" elicits strong reactions—both positive and negative—it's important to recognize that its legacy is tied to its ambition to challenge viewers' perceptions of reality and humanity. Whether one sees it as a masterpiece or a failure, it undeniably sparked conversations about art, technology, and our future.You missed the point of the thread. I'm shocked.
For an example of how new technology can do marvelous things, and can possibly make very bad decisions, the story is right on. The space ship is a super duper "Alexa" powered machine. It has traveled through space to the exact location of this monolith far off in space somewhere. What an extraordinary operation. Then it kills a human, by making it's own decision to do so. It is the "shock" of the whole movie. So it represents the doubts we have about this AI new technology including robotics.
I keep up with AI development news, and this question of trust is always present. It depends completely on those people involved in creating it. If their objectives are to help and do no harm, it will be a useful tool. If their objectives are to do harm to others, that too will be made easier. Right now, as our world is in such large transitions, it is becoming increasingly important to regulate, by law, the punishments for misusing the technology. The problem is that some people will learn how to create these new assistants without any regulations. They are working furiously to be able to track these projects. Probably some will get through, and bad stuff will happen...and there is always human error which can cause major disruptions.
For us "baby-boomers" we will die , but the robotics will keep getting more advanced. I can't imagine the world my grandchildren will face when they are 60. No one can. For now, I am supporting it's development with very exacting oversight. They have to go together.