Hmmm, seems like we are talking about two different things. To me there is a world of difference in men roaming while women stay home and being able to agree to disagree without being disrespectful.I'd answer quixotically that "sometimes I do".
I'm not able to enjoy the company of anyone you might describe as a "doormat", but on the other hand, much as I appreciate "spark", it would be nice occasionally to be agreed with, even though they dont really agree, if you see what I mean, and let you park the darn car wherever you think you should park it, or whatever it might be causes rows!
That's a ham with cloves, not a turkey.... because REAL men set their table with turkeys, shrimp, pineapples, fondue and Pepsi!
:witless:
Ever since that surgery, I feel like a new man.
![]()
This topic reminded me of the poem written by Robert Burns and I think that I agree with his idea of what makes a man. It has been set to music and a glossary would be helpful. Still, if you listen carefully, you can get the gist. Honesty makes the man.
Grahamg wrote:I'd answer quixotically "sometimes I do".......
Marlene wrote:
Hmmm, seems like we are talking about two different things. To me there is a world of difference in men roaming while women stay home and being able to agree to disagree without being disrespectful.
Ah, but we are still talking about different situations here as I like and prefer men who are unequivocally men. No fellas with gender dysphoria for me, thank you. My father was an example of a manly man, and I have reared my sons to be the same. However, I believe to women, there is a world of difference between "roaming" which signifies cheating, and being a man. Plus, as you will note, most women are not content to be thought of as "little women" even at my size (5'3" and a hefty 117 poundsYou know perhaps what is meant by the term " Man's man", which I think is the sort of man not afraid of being a man, or afraid of much else either, (that's the sort of man my father was, and you'd have to say many women express a desire to be with a man who makes them feel secure).
There was a touch of bullishness about the "Men and dogs were meant to roam etc. " saying I admit, and I'd admit it isn't entirely fair to the "Little woman" who was expected to put up with it, but my father was raised in a different era, with three brothers, and very strong minded parents, so he wasn't going to be short of ego!
Ah, but we are still talking about different situations here as I like and prefer men who are unequivocally men. No fellas with gender dysphoria for me, thank you. My father was an example of a manly man, and I have reared my sons to be the same. However, I believe to women, there is a world of difference between "roaming" which signifies cheating, and being a man. Plus, as you will note, most women are not content to be thought of as "little women" even at my size (5'3" and a hefty 117 pounds. So perhaps it is our syntax over which we disagree as I'm pretty certain your mother (or most likely you either) would not have wanted your father to cheat even if he was the manliest man in town - which I'm certain he was since most of us with manly fathers thought that of our own
![]()
Esquire magazine's take on what a man truly is, circa 2009 ...
View attachment 2123
A man can look you up and down and figure some things out. Before you say a word, he makes you. From your suitcase, from your watch, from your posture. A man infers.
What’s this ‘little women’ bull chit?You know perhaps what is meant by the term " Man's man", which I think is the sort of man not afraid of being a man, or afraid of much else either, (that's the sort of man my father was, and you'd have to say many women express a desire to be with a man who makes them feel secure).
There was a touch of bullishness about the "Men and dogs were meant to roam etc. " saying I admit, and I'd admit it isn't entirely fair to the "Little woman" who was expected to put up with it, but my father was raised in a different era, with three brothers, and very strong minded parents, so he wasn't going to be short of ego!
I like the part where they "had to put up with it."What’s this ‘little women’ bull chit?
You’ll admit it isn’t entirely fair to the ‘little women?’
What century’ are you speaking of and in what country? Little woman!!!You’re kidding. Rught?
I know...I like the part where they "had to put up with it."
Or they might just be sociopaths masking their weaknesses, (bear that in mind anyway?)?a real man,in my opinion:
stands behind his word,
has his own value system
has his own moral code
has his own spirituality
has an adventurous spirit
slightly rebel,rough, rugged spirit
not fully tamed and won't be
has dignity,class and his own style
commands respect
confident and stands alone
combination o fstrength and gentleness
bold and unafraid
won't take any crap from anyone
intelligent!
makes his own path and walks it.
No not kidding, wrong, though I am talking a lifetime ago undoubtedly.What’s this ‘little women’ bull chit?
You’ll admit it isn’t entirely fair to the ‘little women?’
What century’ are you speaking of and in what country? Little woman!!!You’re kidding. Right?
The "little woman" my father chose to marry turned out to be pretty tough too, or learned how to be. Not to worry, if you've not met anyone like the ones I'm describing, "I'm sure it ain't held you back none".I like the part where they "had to put up with it."
Amongst our UK prime ministers there were some whose wife had an affair, and they "put up with it" until their wife came to love them again towards the end of their life, (Harold Macmillan comes to mind). Sometimes such forbearance can show great strength of character, and the prime minister I mentioned fought in WWI and his fellow troops used his behaviour as an example, and made the remark "to be as brave as Macmillan").I've met types that have "put up" with their men. I don't have any use for that personally.
Actually I have, but they are few on the Earth.Have you ever met any men like that Gaer?
The only kind I know are mouthy with beer guts. LOL