What is required in your opinion to refer to a powerful intelligent entity as a "god"?

The assumption that someone posts possibly controversial statements in order to "...no one’s mind is going to be changed", change other members minds, is something for a new member to reasonably add but is in fact usually incorrect. Yes, there have been some members herein in the past, especially those in political discussions during election periods that argue like they are trying to change other member names, that is very common on large social media sites where the audience is vast. That is why I make that issue absolutely clear that I've done a few times in this thread that my inputs are speculative ideas merely to consider.

On this quite small web board, we post ideas for the sake of providing personal ideas and perspectives, reflecting examples of the range of ideas different people in our diverse membership have. And then what most of us don't do as is common in other boards, is argue whatever beyond a statement or three. Yes there are a few in the past that didn't get that, so would argue with others like them for pages. And what happened to them? They became bored only after getting receiving response from the same few regardless of how much they baited others that were ignoring them. And after a month or three are gone from the board, not to return.
Gee, if only people had the guts to name people. Sorry if my opinions bother you and some of your friends. I didn’t read in the rules where new members were not allowed to express their opinions. Seems to me you are languishing in the mundane. Get over yourself, hon. Block me if you don’t like what I have to say. You’re boring.🥱

Oh, maybe you’re one of those old men who think women should be silent. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
 

The assumption that someone posts possibly controversial statements in order to "...no one’s mind is going to be changed", change other members minds, is something for a new member to reasonably add but is in fact usually incorrect. Yes, there have been some members herein in the past, especially those in political discussions during election periods that argue like they are trying to change other member names, that is very common on large social media sites where the audience is vast. That is why I make that issue absolutely clear that I've done a few times in this thread that my inputs are speculative ideas merely to consider.

On this quite small web board, we post ideas for the sake of providing personal ideas and perspectives, reflecting examples of the range of ideas different people in our diverse membership have. And then what most of us don't do as is common in other boards, is argue whatever beyond a statement or three. Yes there are a few in the past that didn't get that, so would argue with others like them for pages. And what happened to them? They became bored only after getting receiving response from the same few regardless of how much they baited others that were ignoring them. And after a month or three are gone from the board, not to return.
I like that you like the description "Earth Monkeys" for humans. Having done much research you have an intriguing essay. What u say is a possibility. Thanks for sharing!!!! :)
 

Predictably, tries with excessive negativity, to bait, expecting an emotional respons
It’s obvious you have a very high opinion of yourself. You know everything about everything and will not tolerate dissent. Just the way you write is indicative of a very egotistical person. Sad. If I were a perfect Christian, I would say I’ll pray for you, but I‘m not.

Emotional would be you starting this attack based on my topic of depression.

Show some fortitude. Reply to my comments instead of attempting to be obtuse.🤣🤣🤣
….and he’s proven my points…
 
Last edited:
The assumption that someone posts possibly controversial statements in order to "...no one’s mind is going to be changed", change other members minds, is something for a new member to reasonably add but is in fact usually incorrect. Yes, there have been some members herein in the past, especially those in political discussions during election periods that argue like they are trying to change other member names, that is very common on large social media sites where the audience is vast. That is why I make that issue absolutely clear that I've done a few times in this thread that my inputs are speculative ideas merely to consider.

On this quite small web board, we post ideas for the sake of providing personal ideas and perspectives, reflecting examples of the range of ideas different people in our diverse membership have. And then what most of us don't do as is common in other boards, is argue whatever beyond a statement or three. Yes there are a few in the past that didn't get that, so would argue with others like them for pages. And what happened to them? They became bored only after getting receiving response from the same few regardless of how much they baited others that were ignoring them. And after a month or three are gone from the board, not to return.
Do you really think anyone reads your screeds? Here’s an idea, start your own site and invite only people who agree with you. 🤡
 
... Get over yourself, hon. Block me if you don’t like what I have to say. You’re boring.🥱

Oh, maybe you’re one of those old men who think women should be silent. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sometimes we should be.
Please stop before you get this thread shut down!
** Social media made y'all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it. --Mike Tyson **
 


Back
Top