Side effects are one thing, few and mild is ok. Its the long term effects that are not known and won't be until those who are vaccinated prove there are or are not any effects from the vaccine. 1 plus years from now people may have health problems due to the actual vaccine. We don't know as it has not been tested long enough.I feel the same about it as Warrigal. When my physician recommends it, I will enthusiastically take it. What is there to worry so much about? A few side effects? I'm willing to take that much of a risk in order to get my life back.
Of course, if it looks iffy, not well tested, potentially dangerous, etc., no one will take it. Before it's distributed to the public, it will have to be pretty thoroughly tested.
Your points are well taken.Side effects are one thing, few and mild is ok. Its the long term effects that are not known and won't be until those who are vaccinated prove there are or are not any effects from the vaccine. 1 plus years from now people may have health problems due to the actual vaccine. We don't know as it has not been tested long enough.
I tried to yesterday, nowhere available here in the High Desert. If I start to have worse symptoms I'll go straight to the nearest ER.Nathan, please get a test. NOW. This is nothing to mess around with.
When a doctor says he wouldn't consider a vaccine, that's what is known as a "Hint." A really big hint.As of now, it's my intention not to take it but maybe that will change. I know I won't be rushing out to get it. My doctor said he wouldn't consider getting a rushed vaccine even though his brother was dreadfully sick with COVID back in the summer. I saw on the news that many people don't trust because they feel vaccine production is being politicized.
Qantas airline CEO is considering not allowing anyone who hasn't been vaccinated to fly internationally.
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michae...-19-vaccine-fly-internationally-its-necessity
YUP....Since I had COVID-19, I certainly will not take it. I also prefer a longer testing and perfecting period for a new vaccine. This has been a slap dash one from the outset.
Yes, excellent point, FM.J & J talcum powder used for how long before the cancer accusations? Also, the weed killer accused as ell. I can't recall the brand.
I believe they will sanction people refusing the vaccine from all social gatherings, grocery stores, pharmacies, churches, etc. I believe receiving the vaccine will implement greater control by the powers that be. Whether you get vaccine or not it will be vital in the outcome of freedom
Myself, as well as my husband will not be partaking in any Covid-19 vaccines of any kind.
J & J talcum powder used for how long before the cancer accusations? Also, the weed killer accused as ell. I can't recall the brand.
Not meaning to sound political, but why are world leaders so invested in making certain everyone gets vaccinated? There is something much bigger at play here.I doubt "they" will be able to do all that sanctioning practically or legally (social gatherings? churches, pharmacies? How's that gonna work?) What "they" can and doubtlessly will do is require the vaccines for certain kinds of jobs, enrolling kids in school, international travel, etc. Other vaccines are already required for those things anyway, so covid will probably just be added to the list.
Thank you for the great post, Jim.The weed killer is Monsanto's Roundup.
Keep in mind that there is a large industry of tort attorneys who make money by publicizing these claims. They don't even have to win their cases, just create enough noise to get an out of court settlement.
Regarding talcum powder, this is from the American Cancer Society:
Many studies in women have looked at the possible link between talcum powder and cancer of the ovary. Findings have been mixed, with some studies reporting a slightly increased risk and some reporting no increase.
Many case-control studies have found a small increase in risk. But these types of studies can be biased because they often rely on a person’s memory of talc use many years earlier.
Prospective cohort studies, which would not have the same type of potential bias, have generally not found a significant increase in ovarian cancer risk overall. However, some have suggested possible increased risks in certain groups of women (for example, in women who still have an intact reproductive tract) or in certain types of ovarian cancer.
One of the problems with studying this issue is that ovarian cancer isn’t common. Because of this, even the largest studies done so far might not have been big enough to detect a very small increase in risk, if it exists.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/talcum-powder-and-cancer.html
Not meaning to sound political, but why are world leaders so invested in making certain everyone gets vaccinated? There is something much bigger at play here.
Why? So that this virus can be stopped, that's why. Or do people want to live like this for several more years until herd immunity kicks in or the virus morphs into a less dangerous version.Not meaning to sound political, but why are world leaders so invested in making certain everyone gets vaccinated? There is something much bigger at play here.