Why would you teach a nine year old to use a uzi

Ina said:
Pooper:awman::lame:
Click to expand...


Lame ?Nuhu..

No I'm not, just have a little hitch in my getty-up.

Kid should never have been holding an Uzi by herself. What that event did to her will scar her for life.
 

Problem with the Mass law as you state is that there is no way to enforce it. What are you going to do search every household? Gee how many civil rights does that violate. The law center to prevent gun violence is another one of Billionare Michael Bloombergs PACs. As far as nationwide, thankfully most of the western states see the stupidity in it, and have programs in place to teach young people. Part of this will includes arming and training teachers in public schools. The best solution would be for the recreation dept. of each city, to have a shooting range. But with so much funding going to irrigate the number grown crop in the US, grass, golfing would suffer.
The mass, law which is currently being challenged on constitutional issues is part of a 20 state suit against the SAFE act, passed by New York last year. This is hopes of getting the Supreme Court, who has side stepped the issue as of the Heller case.
 
The mass, law which is currently being challenged on constitutional issues is part of a 20 state suit against the SAFE act, passed by New York last year.
Click to expand...

Because Heaven forbid that a law should be passed to help keep children and teens safe.

Where in The Constitution does it say, even indirectly, that you have the right to store firearms in such as way as to enable children to shoot themselves or their friends with fully loaded automatic weapons left lying around the house? Is there no room for some common sense in the national good?
 

rt3 said:
well your shot missed its mark, you are slow on the draw, you are shooting with rubber bullets, and you shoot with a limp wrist, (causes the gun to misfire)

insane, assault, innocent, drugs, etc are legal terms defined by the Federal government you do not get to change their meanings to suit your agenda. Unfortunately they are bandied about by lay people under the assumption every one shares the same definition.
Click to expand...

^ Total, utter & complete....

Horse_Shit.jpg


None of those words you listed are "legal terms". You can find their meaning in any dictionary & they have been used conversationally for as long as they've been in existence.

Nor did I attempt to change their meaning to to suit any agenda or for any other reason.

They are what they are, they mean what they mean & I meant them the way I used them.

You, on the other hand, seem only able to deflect & obfuscate.

Obviously because you know I'm right.
 
Dame Warrigal said:
Because Heaven forbid that a law should be passed to help keep children and teens safe.

Where in The Constitution does it say, even indirectly, that you have the right to store firearms in such as way as to enable children to shoot themselves or their friends with fully loaded automatic weapons left lying around the house? Is there no room for some common sense in the national good?
Click to expand...

I think he considers that to fall under "the pursuit of happiness".... :D
 
rt3 said:
Problem with the Mass law as you state is that there is no way to enforce it. What are you going to do search every household? Gee how many civil rights does that violate. The law center to prevent gun violence is another one of Billionare Michael Bloombergs PACs. As far as nationwide, thankfully most of the western states see the stupidity in it, and have programs in place to teach young people. Part of this will includes arming and training teachers in public schools. The best solution would be for the recreation dept. of each city, to have a shooting range. But with so much funding going to irrigate the number grown crop in the US, grass, golfing would suffer.
The mass, law which is currently being challenged on constitutional issues is part of a 20 state suit against the SAFE act, passed by New York last year. This is hopes of getting the Supreme Court, who has side stepped the issue as of the Heller case.
Click to expand...

When this country gets to the point that we feel arming teachers in public schools is a good thing, then we will have gone completely over the edge.

And we will have the gun industry, their shills in the NRA & their willing dupes & useful tools to thank for it.

I wonder what the 2nd amendment crowd's answer will be, after the first few times a group of teenage boys overpowers an armed teacher, takes his/her gun away, then goes on a shooting rampage, typical of the ones we'll likely be hearing about once or twice a month by then.

Wonder how these "Einsteins" will defend their "genius" reasoning behind arming teachers then.
 
My father and grandfather taught me to use firearms when I was a child. HOWEVER, along with the skill, they also taught me a healthy respect for the killing power of weapons and the proper and safe way to handle and use them, along with the proper and safe way to clean and store them.

IMHO, it is absolutely NUTS to allow a nine year old to to try to handle and fire an UZI, under any circumstances. If the parents didn't know any better, the firing range personnel surely should have known better. They should have known that a child that small couldn't properly handle that weapon. This was supposed to be entertainment????? Geez! What is WRONG with some people???

There is a whole big difference between the right to keep and bear arms and putting an automatic weapon in the hands of a child, even for a minute!!!
 
wrong again Mr. Jim, an act or person is only insane if a court says so, opinions are like the rear end of that horse, everyone has one
etc, for assault, drugs, etc. etc. dictionaries are a definition of idiots using terms they don't understand ex. urban dictionary.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top