Your Thoughts On Prince Harry & Meghan Upcoming Interview

Princess Anne, a royal princess meaning that she was a princess from birth, has a son and a daughter, neither of whom have a title. They are Peter Mark Andrew Phillips and Zara Anne Elizabeth (Phillips) Tindall. On the other hand, Prince Andrew's daughters are both referred to as Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice. It is up to the monarch to bestow titles.
 

  • Like
Reactions: Lee
Depression is widespread and should be addressed publicly, not hidden away in private.
Apologies, I did not mean to give offence, just relate my own experience.

I agree mental health should not be hidden in a general sense but for the individual it is not so easy.

I remember sitting at my laptop sobbing bitterly looking at suicide websites because I could not get the cap off a pot of marmalade. That's when you really know life has got on top of you.

I shared that with no one except my doctor, not even my wife.

The only reason I share it here, 23 years on, is because I'm anonymous.

I know whereof I speak.
 
In case you are wondering about the furniture that was featured in this special,it comes from actor Christopher KNight's{"Peter Brady" of TV show Brady Bunch} company,Christopher KNight Brand which he started in 2012.The wicker& Acacia Burchett Outdoor Chairs set costs $554,but is now sold out on Amazon,Overstock.He's amazed so many people wanted to buy the set
 
I find it hard to believe Meghan was ever told by anyone in power that she couldn't see a therapist. The person she (wrongly) approached in the palace was in the Human Resources dept which was for the servants. She was told by him that he could only make such arrangements for the paid employees. The staff for the royals, everyone from window cleaners to cooks and maids numbers the hundreds. Naturally that group of servants doesn't include the people they serve.

Diana had a regular therapist. We know Prince Phillip saw one at one time, and who knows who else, it would be confidential patient information. So I seriously doubt that Meghan would ever have been denied help if she had asked one of the other royals to arrange it for her. But I don't know why she would do that. All Meghan, herself, ever needed to do was call her regular doctor and ask for a referral. Then call for a driver, the same way she calls for a driver to take her to baby showers, pre-natal appointments or anywhere else. No need to call a Uber.

I feel sympathy for anyone with depression, but I don't understand why Meghan, a 39 year-old woman, couldn't have picked up her phone and made an appointment for herself. No one else even needed to know a thing about it.

I had the same feeling, Della. I don't understand why she went to Human Resources in the first place, and why she didn't just, as you said, pick up the phone and call her doctor. That business about being told she couldn't see a therapist sounded pretty hokey to me.

Maybe someone advised her to keep any such visits to a therapist private, and especially not to let the ghoulish paparazzi get their fangs into it; that would make sense. But being told she "couldn't" see a therapist when she was contemplating suicide? I pretty much believed all her grievances until I started thinking about that remark. I just don't buy it.

Sometimes people who are depressed, miserable, feeling discriminated against, treated unfairly, etc. tend to read things in which were not intended, or even things that happened only in their imagination. I'm not saying she made it up, but she could have misinterpreted something that the PR person said. It's just a little too over the top to be believable.

I'm also wondering about that business about not having access to her passport, driver's license, car keys, etc. Knowing nothing about palace procedures, all I can do is speculate. She wasn't a prisoner, though she apparently felt like one. I suspect that official documents, permits, car keys, etc. are kept in a safe place for the benefit of the royals, not to punish them. If she asked for her driver's license and car keys, and was denied access to those things, I would believe she was a prisoner. But I think she may have been applying a hostile attitude to things that were being done for her own safety and convenience. (Imagine misplacing your car keys in a building the size of Buckingham Palace!)

Not taking sides here, I think she could be right on the button in suspecting some members of the royal family of racism. And discussions about what color the baby would be are disgusting. She may have had adequate reason to fly the coop right there. But these other accusations sound whiny, and kind of dubious.

Anyway, it was an interesting two hours.
 
Hellooooo royal family pompous and pretentious. A given what the heck was she thinking. And if one voluntarily decides to discuss their medical or social issues out in public expect some different opinion.

Her level of celebrity was no where near the royals and she should've been able to spot that & what ever goes along with it miles away. Especially as an outsider.
 
Last edited:
Piers Morgan does spend time building up some peoples lives, for example championing Captain Tom on his way up and down his garden a hundred times, in the run up to his hundredth birthday, so Piers is a more nuanced character than you're giving him credit for, but please desist, I'm as ready to condemn the man as anyone for his bloated ego etc., so stop forcing me to defend him! :)
Gotcha.

Here's what irks me. I read that the Queen and Harry have a good relationship. In other words, she loves her grandson and what pains him pains her. Morgan slandered Meghan which hurt Harry and in turn the Queen. I guess Morgan's mother never told him that if you can't say anything good about someone, don't say anything at all. :)
 
Gotcha.
Here's what irks me. I read that the Queen and Harry have a good relationship. In other words, she loves her grandson and what pains him pains her. Morgan slandered Meghan which hurt Harry and in turn the Queen. I guess Morgan's mother never told him that if you can't say anything good about someone, don't say anything at all. :)
Not quite "Gotcha" so far as Meghan goes, because her disloyalty shown towards her own father trumps almost anything in my book, and Piers Morgan going overboard on Meghan's "wokeness" pales into insignificance in my view.
Our queen btw is made of tough stuff, (you have to be to take on the role of head of state, carrying forth a most historical role into yet another generation, not unique in this world, but arguably the preeminent monarchy! :)
 
Not quite "Gotcha" so far as Meghan goes, because her disloyalty shown towards her own father trumps almost anything in my book, and Piers Morgan going overboard on Meghan's "wokeness" pales into insignificance in my view.
Our queen btw is made of tough stuff, (you have to be to take on the role of head of state, carrying forth a most historical role into yet another generation, not unique in this world, but arguably the preeminent monarchy! :)
To each their own opinion. I've tired of this topic and it's time to move on. It's starting to sound like a political thread with people taking sides and forming enemies. Not good. Have a good day! :censored:
 
Not quite "Gotcha" so far as Meghan goes, because her disloyalty shown towards her own father trumps almost anything in my book, and Piers Morgan going overboard on Meghan's "wokeness" pales into insignificance in my view.
Our queen btw is made of tough stuff, (you have to be to take on the role of head of state, carrying forth a most historical role into yet another generation, not unique in this world, but arguably the preeminent monarchy! :)
Hahaha, that is a personal agenda you are trying to perpetrate on Meghan. I have seen your posts where you supposedly got a raw deal in the past. Meghan's father is the lowest of low.
 
Last edited:
There is a history that got Piers Morgan's boxers all twisted:

A complete timeline is in the link.

"Congrats Meghan & Harry," the TV host wrote on Twitter in response to the official announcement of their engagement. "My friend will make the perfect modern bride.
ps Do I get an invite @meghanmarkle?"

November 2017: Morgan pens a Daily Mail column headlined: "Hearty congratulations, Harry, you picked a real keeper (even if your romance did destroy my beautiful friendship with the amazing Meghan Markle)."

https://www.insider.com/piers-morgan-meghan-markle-relationship-interview-timeline
 
Piers Morgan reminds me of disgraced Bill O'Reilly of FOXNews. Two bloviating bullies of substantial jowls.

"It's a fitting end, in a way, for the latest controversy, which has very little to do with free speech and a whole lot to do with hypocrisy. For all his talk of Meghan and her husband, Harry, Duke of Sussex, manipulating people emotionally, that's precisely what Morgan is trying to do."

"Morgan's dismissive comments, especially about Meghan's openness about her mental health struggles, show him to be suspicious of this kind of emotion, in a way that feels familiar. So much criticism of contemporary culture, particularly conversations about racism, sexism and fairness, is rooted in the notion that it's too affective, too thin-skinned and subjective. The politics of empathy and fairness are rejected as a politics of fragility, a sign of either weakness or manipulation."

https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/10/opinions/piers-morgan-real-problem-meghan-hemmer/index.html
 
If their purpose in going on Oprah and saying the things they said was not for some kind of revenge for perceived wrongs and to embarrass the royal family, I do not see why they did it. The goings on within the family are no one's business but the family's, and I do not see how any good can come of all the innuendo and accusations, certainly not from having it all aired on American TV. What earthly business is it of ours, anyway? I doubt people in the UK care much what Americans think about the inner workings of their monarchy.

Be it truth or lies, I think the whole thing of going on American TV and attempting to air their dirty linen in public is incredibly tacky, at best.
 
Hahaha, that is a personal agenda you are trying to perpetrate on Meghan. I have seen your posts where you supposedly got a raw deal in the past. Meghan's father is the lowest of low.
You so easily dismiss Meghan's dad, though he had a fairly successful career I believe, successfully reared a second family when his marriage to Meghan's mother Doreen failed. Meghan herself was raised by him in some very formative years I believe, so many people might fairly suggest Thomas Markle as a dad, was very far from the lowest of the low, but go on saying he is won't you, because in my view such condemnation only proves my "fathers rights" arguments you allude to! :)
 
If their purpose in going on Oprah and saying the things they said was not for some kind of revenge for perceived wrongs and to embarrass the royal family, I do not see why they did it. The goings on within the family are no one's business but the family's, and I do not see how any good can come of all the innuendo and accusations, certainly not from having it all aired on American TV. What earthly business is it of ours, anyway? I doubt people in the UK care much what Americans think about the inner workings of their monarchy.

Be it truth or lies, I think the whole thing of going on American TV and attempting to air their dirty linen in public is incredibly tacky, at best.
i sometimes wonder if many americans care about what goes on in the monarchy. i certainly don't pay attn. it's nothing personal but i got my own life to worry about. sounds like meghan is a drama queen.
 
i sometimes wonder if many americans care about what goes on in the monarchy. i certainly don't pay attn. it's nothing personal but i got my life to worry about. sounds like meghan is a drama queen.
Precisely...and we wouldn't care about what's happening on a Domestic level to any high ranking American... however when you have lies being told about you as a country by someone who is not British, then the hackles rise particularly something as incendiary as racism, .... as I'm sure they would if the situation had been reversed and prince Harry had been accusing the American people of the same accusations as MM has accused a country and it's Royal Family who welcomed her with open arms... ...
 
Last edited:
If the situation had been reversed, and prince Harry had been accusing the American people of the same accusations as MM has accused a country and it's Royal Family who welcomed her with open arms... ...
I hadn't thought about it this way. You are so right. Therefore, I'm tapping out of this thread. I was often irritated when non-Americans weighed in on US politics with fully formed opinions despite their own lack of context and a poor grasp of the complexities.

I apologize to anyone who took offense from my comments.
 
Last edited:
The little I saw of the interview really shows how disconnected the very wealthy and powerful are from the rest of us.
It's so true.. aside anything else.. they gave no thought to his grandfather age almost 100 in hospital suffering from heart problems... nor did they give a stuff about everyone who has suffered during this pandemic... all about their selfish woke needs...
 


Back
Top