Standards which are selectively enforced to censor anything they deem "unacceptable", ie, anything that doesn't fall in lockstep with the official far left or "liberal" narrative. It's appalling, and utterly hypocritical what these sites do allow to stand if it furthers that narrative.
I wasn't born yesterday, I understand the rights of private entities to conduct business as they choose. When those entities are in the business of communicating and disseminating exchange of information, ideas, or opinions, and even healthy debate of such by diverse individuals who use these entities as their platform, one might wonder at their "corporate decisions" to exclude a particular group of individuals solely because their contributions don't agree with what the masses are "supposed" to be thinking.
It's also all too apparent how pervasive the actions of those that would silence others who express ideas, concepts or opinions that don't jive with the approved narrative have become. It's hard NOT to speculate on the motives of those who engage in such vicious censorship.
Those whose goals are to control each and every avenue of communication, to squelch diverse ideas and information totally.
Oh, and Starsong, my response was not to your post, it was to MacGeek, who said he(?she) wanted to hear what these doctors had to say, and apparently was unable to do so thanks to the censorship of these sites. It matters not to me what you read or where you get your information, that's your choice. Though I will say the videos I was referring to could be found at locations other than on Breitbart, thanks to the interest of so many who also wanted to hear, and pass along what these docs had to say.
