One reason there were only Democrats wanting to release this nonsense, is that most of the rest of the folks felt that what happened in the early terror days was the honest feeling of most folks for the early years after the New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington DC, activities by the attackers. For many years the fear was great and we even got support in the Congress for much of what was going on. To apply today's popular opinions to what happened years back is wrong and the facts for much should likely not been released publicly for many years to come. For our safety, and for the not yet ended activities, much of this could have been kept for future release. As I have read, much of this activity had been ended some years back but the many battles still continue and we could have kept quiet for longer times.
Your ideas are yours to keep, but for many folks in the US and around the world, this one sided report is wrong and definitely wrongly exposed as those battles still continue and have recently been getting worse. What you do believe is yours to believe. But lots of others, including the political groups that were not agreeing to release all these privately put together ideas, and get down to proper descriptions of what and why and when. Ignoring that the Democrats of those early years did support these actions and now making noises about putting so many folks on trial for so called errors of those early years, is both not true or necessary and should never have happened.
Why should anyone bother to read what has been reported to be a one sided report. Your analogies are really pretty bad and not at all connected to the release.