I hate to ask something stupid but what does the AOG in churches stand for?I have nothing against the AOG churches but two very calus responses to you makes me wonder what's going on.![]()
I hate to ask something stupid but what does the AOG in churches stand for?I have nothing against the AOG churches but two very calus responses to you makes me wonder what's going on.![]()
I hate to ask something stupid but what does the AOG in churches stand for?
Thanks. I should have known that.Assembly of God.
There are roughly 2.3 billion Christians in the world. If even 75% of them say a single prayer each day, that adds up to about 1.7 billion prayers daily—nearly 72 million every hour. It’s hard to imagine any entity processing that much simultaneous input. For me, the scientific explanation seems more coherent than the faith-based one

Wow.It took a while to repair because even in 1980 the engine, a Hallscott, overhead cam, horizontally mounted in-line 6 cylinder engine, was obsolete even then. I took me about 3 months of Saturdays to get all of them up to par. When I felt they were, I took a Saturday off. The next Saturday when I showed up to the Church to make some checks, the pastor call me in his office and said, "I want you to take your tools home with you. You said you'd be here every Saturday and you didn't show up last Saturday."
Having to spend time to listenThere are roughly 2.3 billion Christians in the world. If even 75% of them say a single prayer each day, that adds up to about 1.7 billion prayers daily—nearly 72 million every hour. It’s hard to imagine any entity processing that much simultaneous input. For me, the scientific explanation seems more coherent than the faith-based one
might explain why so many aren't experiencing this.to about 1.7 billion prayers daily—nearly 72 million every hour.
I’m sure many believers see this differently than I do, but I’ve never been able to convince myself that a being of such immense power truly exists. And if such an entity did, I find it hard to imagine that the wants and needs voiced in daily prayers would amount to anything more than trivial noise to it. In the words of Jim Morrison, "you cannot petition the lord with prayer"View attachment 475031
If one believes in God, creator of the world and all it holds, and the universe itself, surely they would accept that he could process more simultaneous input than Google.
There are roughly 2.3 billion Christians in the world. If even 75% of them say a single prayer each day, that adds up to about 1.7 billion prayers daily—nearly 72 million every hour. It’s hard to imagine any entity processing that much simultaneous input. For me, the scientific explanation seems more coherent than the faith-based one
Excellent point!Spare a thought for poor old Allah he has the same number of god botherers praying to him, not once but 5 times a day (I think that's right), probably quite fed up with the whole thing.
Even omnipotent beings deserve time off or at least some down time, poor buggers.
The part in bold above is deflection. It is not what I was addressing in my post #304, when I replied to this:I’m sure many believers see this differently than I do, but I’ve never been able to convince myself that a being of such immense power truly exists.
I have nothing to add.There are roughly 2.3 billion Christians in the world. If even 75% of them say a single prayer each day, that adds up to about 1.7 billion prayers daily—nearly 72 million every hour. It’s hard to imagine any entity processing that much simultaneous input. For me, the scientific explanation seems more coherent than the faith-based one
What is He to do about it? The majority doesn't want Him to reign here as King. Some guy serving satan starts a war. What's God to do? Kill him? What about the millions who follow him?I also wrestle with the idea that a benevolent creator would allow the world’s suffering to persist as it does. I’ve never been able to reconcile that, even with the familiar reassurances—“we don’t understand God’s plan” or “He never gives us more than we can handle.” Those explanations simply don’t resolve the tension for me.
What you wrote about Google and God is a very good comparison. It's simple but gets the point across when trying to explain how God can be at all places at once.View attachment 475031
If one believes in God, creator of the world and all it holds, and the universe itself, surely they would accept that he could process more simultaneous input than Google.
Do you expect to be saved and get a new heaven and earth with no suffering in the future sometime? What if you just die and decompose?He is long suffering and waits for the souls to get saved and then we get a new heaven and earth with no suffering.
No way to know that.Do you expect to be saved and get a new heaven and earth with no suffering in the future sometime? What if you just die and decompose?
It seems to me that if God really has the limitless power we say He does, Satan shouldn’t be a cosmic arch‑nemesis so much as a minor housekeeping issue.there's a war going on between satan and his followers and God and His followers. Take Paul. He killed cristians. God could have killed him. Problem solved. But He wants everyone to get saved, so He is long suffering and waits for the souls to get saved and then we get a new heaven and earth with no suffering.
I viewed my reply not as deflection but as an attempt to clarify my perspective on the larger God narrative. It wasn’t meant to avoid the issue; I believed it addressed the topic at hand. I do understand your point, though your comparison places a supernatural entity alongside a machine, which is quite a distinct framework from the one I’m using.The part in bold above is deflection. It is not what I was addressing in my post #304, when I replied to this: I’ve never been able to convince myself that a being of such immense power truly exists.
It's the principle of the thing. How dare he presume!It seems to me that if God really has the limitless power we say He does, Satan shouldn’t be a cosmic arch‑nemesis so much as a minor housekeeping issue.
It's not that he's so powerful, but that so many follow him. If nobody would fall for his lies he'd have zero power. He said to Jesus that he would give Him all the kingdoms of the world because they were given to him. Adam gave it to him and anyone who follows him gives him power to start a war or whatever. Jesus broke his power. He's powerless, but he can still lie and inspire people to kill.It seems to me that if God really has the limitless power we say He does, Satan shouldn’t be a cosmic arch‑nemesis so much as a minor housekeeping issue.
We get a new body. Only the body dies. If it turns out I was wrong a plant can grow or something, but people have come back. Ian Mc Cormack, an African pastor after 3 days.Do you expect to be saved and get a new heaven and earth with no suffering in the future sometime? What if you just die and decompose?
Thanks for taking the time to explain. You have always been respectful of other members' posts, even at times when there is disagreement, so I'll attempt to react with the same courtesy.I viewed my reply not as deflection but as an attempt to clarify my perspective on the larger God narrative. It wasn’t meant to avoid the issue; I believed it addressed the topic at hand. I do understand your point, though your comparison places a supernatural entity alongside a machine, which is quite a distinct framework from the one I’m using.
Thanks, I really do try to be respectful of other people’s views and posts. There’s no need for anyone to get cranky just because we might see things differently. It's rare that one is able to change another's mind when it comes to politics and religion, perhaps why these subjects are best avoided.Thanks for taking the time to explain. You have always been respectful of other members' posts, even at times when there is disagreement, so I'll attempt to react with the same courtesy.
I agree that comparing God "a supernatual entity" (+) "alongside a machine", is indeed a "distinct framework," but that does not prevent using the comparison, nor change the fairness of it. If a "machine" is capable of processing a vast amount of information in a miniscule amount of time, how much more capable an all powerful God would be at doing so, which was my original point. [It wasn't complicated.]