Warrigal
SF VIP
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
Unknowingly is something else. Of course the married one knows he or she is married but may conceal that fact from another. In that case the odium falls on the deceiver.
Unknowingly is something else. Of course the married one knows he or she is married but may conceal that fact from another. In that case the odium falls on the deceiver.
Unknowingly is something else. Of course the married one knows he or she is married but may conceal that fact from another. In that case the odium falls on the deceiver.
Point taken, and if you don't mind my saying (as I mean this as a compliment), you don't sound like someone to be crossed lightly.
We've moved the topic into the area of "morals" now haven't we, so maybe a bit off topic, but as I'm primarily responsible, and the OP maybe I'll get away with it!
Whether we like it or not, we live in a world of forced interdependence. Unfortunately, we can't live without them, but they can live with us
My sister has a cheating husband but she has stuck with him. She deserves much better but what happens within a marriage is nobody else's business most of the time. I respect their marriage bond and whoever she loves, I must love too but I am very grateful for the loyalty of my own husband.
I'd say yes it is for some people and it's not for others.
Yes it is.Can't argue with that either (if its your response to OP statement?).
Grahamg wrote:
"Can't argue with that either (if its your response to OP statement?)."
Ruthanne wrote:
"Yes it is."
I've been on cruises and attended the evacuation information sessions and there is not such thing as "women and children first". It is more a case of get your lifejacket and make your way to a muster point and you will be escorted to a lifeboat in an orderly way.
I take that with a grain of salt because if the ship is listing badly it might not be able to lower all of the boats. I think Hubby and I might choose to stand back and allow families to have the best chance of survival. We have lived our lives and wouldn't mind dying together if it ever comes to that. However, I think the crew would do their best to follow procedure which is probably egalitarian or first come first served because that is most efficient.
I was on a forum a while back where we were discussing some proposed changes about who is allowed to sit nearest emergency exits in public conveyances. Someone suggested that the elderly and frail should be positioned to get out first. I laughed and said I've had too many experiences where able-bodied young men would have trampled me quite cheerfully to get in line for a movie or to get ahead of me walking into a store. There were several responses, all from men, saying that couldn't possibly be true. I've remembered and laughed about their naivete several times since that happened.
I don't think people know what it's like to be a very little old lady whose life is apparently expendable when lines form. And they've obviously not watched young people endlessly circling parking lots to get the closest parking places.
Or maybe that only happens where I live. We have some subspecies of humanity here that should not be allowed to procreate.
You have to struggle to get an education. You are in a competition to graduate.
Why? Do schools only award their diplomas or degrees to the top contenders? I thought students were graded on how well they did the course work, not whether they beat someone else to the finish line.
My father used to tell all his family: "Its every man for himself in this world?"
Do you agree?
Don't know if it works like that, Camper.
Grahamg wrote:
"My father used to tell all his family: "Its every man for himself in this world?"
Do you agree?"
Knight wrote:
"Agreement would imply that we've all experienced why your father used to tell his family that.
Maybe if you explained how he came to that conclusion, life experiences of others would off set what he said."
Perhaps he was warning his children not to be too trusting in a world that often brings let downs?