Aunt Bea
SF VIP
- Location
- Near Mount Pilot
Somehow the punishment doesn't seem to fit the crime.
Somehow the punishment doesn't seem to fit the crime.
If I had been on the jury, I would have voted not guilty.
And if we support our police, maybe, just maybe the thugs will realize we the people are tired of their criminal ways.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, we get the idea. Do you have anything new to add, or are you just going to repeat yourself, over and over again. ?
I think this guy RPG is an embittered ex-cop who thinks we are still living in the old wild west. I've got news for him. It's the 21st century and it's time to stop murdering people just because a cop THINKS the poor guy MIGHT be a criminal.
I'll repeat as many times as I can, because it is what needs to be said.
I think this guy traveler might be an ex-con, or a wanna be.
I'll repeat as many times as I can, because it is what needs to be said.
I think this guy traveler might be an ex-con, or a wanna be.
OH dear Lord, you just can't accept that you're wrong...that you're in the minority ..slings and arrows....if someone disagrees with your opinion then they must be guilty themselves ...dear oh dear... I'm sorry, but I hope you never serve on a jury where an innocent person is on trial, your views are dangerous.
People on here are all sick of crime, everyone want something more done about the escalating crime rate but in this instance the crime was committed by a COP..someone who's supposed to be law abiding and he wasn't.. he killed that man, shot him in the back 8 times, simply for running away..that was no law abiding Cop, that was a Murderer and a Coward.. who imagined he could hide behind a uniform...well lets hope the tide is turning and police start doing their job properly, and stop shooting unarmed people instead of simply arresting them
OH dear Lord, you just can't accept that you're wrong...that you're in the minority ..slings and arrows....if someone disagrees with your opinion then they must be guilty themselves ...dear oh dear... I'm sorry, but I hope you never serve on a jury where an innocent person is on trial, your views are dangerous.
People on here are all sick of crime, everyone want something more done about the escalating crime rate but in this instance the crime was committed by a COP..someone who's supposed to be law abiding and he wasn't.. he killed that man, shot him in the back 8 times, simply for running away..that was no law abiding Cop, that was a Murderer and a Coward.. who thought he he could hide behind a uniform...well lets hope the tide is turning and police start doing their job properly, and stop shooting unarmed people instead of simply arresting them
"OH dear Lord, you just can't accept that you're wrong...that you're in the minority ..slings and arrows....if someone disagrees with your opinion then they must be guilty themselves ...dear oh dear... I'm sorry, but I hope you never serve on a jury where an innocent person is on trial, your views are dangerous.?"
I am not the one that started the "slings & arrows" That was started by Mr traveler when he posted an opinion about me, thinking he knows something about me, when he does not.
In the minority or not...I stand by my opinion.
We can argue back and forth until doomsday, but it will never change the simple fact that Slager was found guilty by a jury of his peers and sentenced to 20 years in a federal prison.
By now, I imagine that every cop in America has heard about this. It can only be hoped that they might think about the consequences of their actions and learn that they can not kill people unless there is darn good reason. Simply saying, "I feared for my life is no longer good enough". The physical evidence must back-up what the cop says.
With those words, I sign off this thread.
" If the officer followed his training and checked for wants, warrants and BOLO's before he exited his vehicle and found none, the driver committed no offense, other than to have a burned out taillight, why would he shoot at the driver? "
All that information is about the license plate....It means nothing regarding the person. They are quite often not the same. Particularly in the criminal world.
You and I see things differently. Trayvon Martin was shot while beating up a man (who Trayvon knocked to the ground, pounced on, and was continuing to pound on him while he was on the ground) who was trying to perform a community service in his neighborhood, which had a high incidence of burglaries. He was on the phone with the police as part of a community watch program and was trying to keep an eye on a suspicious character who he was not familiar with until the police arrived to check out what he was up to. Zimmerman never tried to get between Trayvon and where Trayvon was trying to go, they only came into physical contact because Trayvon decided that's what he wanted. All that came out in the trial. What also came out in the trial was how the some of the media purposely tried to make it out different than it was and unfortunately a huge part of the population hang on to that twisted, dishonest version of what happened.Springer, read answer no. 55 above, where Holly describes the British system, with the unarmed police doing their job just fine. They manage to apprehend criminals without shooting them on the spot.
Also, for the information of you and your gun-totin' buddy, many of the people who have been killed by overzealous cops were not guilty of anything. Several of them that I have read about were what used to be called retarded (I think "mentally challenged" is the term now). and also guilty of being black. In one case, a young man, little more than a child, was killed because he didn't understand that he was supposed to vacate his movie seat when the picture was over. In another case, people have been killed by police for minor traffic infractions. And then there was the Travon Martin case, in which an unarmed teenager was shot and killed by George Zimmerman, who was acquitted because of "lack of evidence?" Zimmerman had a history of calling the police and reporting "suspicious" people walking in his neighborhood. Trayvon Martin was guilty of being black and wearing a hoodie.
I believe if you've been a police officer for some time, you have developed some skill at reading people. And if you are in such an emotional state that you believe your life is always in imminent danger, maybe police work is not for you. The job does require you to put yourself in danger, whenever you interact with the community. (No way, I'd do it.) The White cop/Black shot incidents are flash points because we've never dealt with racism in the US. We see a Black face at the head table and think aren't we great. We over police Black communities ( stop any Black for any reason). The Police say that's where crime is. Or is the over policing causing Black males to start out life with having bogus criminal records, when they are 13-14. You think this is exaggeration? If you're White, how many times have your kids been stopped and frisked on their way to school?
Well, that may be true, but this is as well...If we do not support our police we will have anarchy...I guarantee .
Support what police, rgp? Should anyone wearing a police uniform be "supported," just because he is a cop? Wasn't that mentality exactly what led to Nazi Germany, and leads to fascist brutality everywhere?
Yes, we should "support" (whatever that means) our decent, law-abiding police, who of course are the majority of police officers. No one should be supported, no matter what he does, simply because he is wearing a uniform.
Good grief, man, listen to what you are saying!
Trying to get Slager supporter's to see common sense, is like trying to get a wife beater to take responsibility for his actions.
The wife beater will always say, "She was asking for it" or "She made me do it".
Neither of them, "get it".
Our society is at a cross-roads. We either advance toward a more civilized, non-racist society or we slide into a police state where rogue cops can do anything, to anyone, any time they feel like it.
Yeah , for sure let's hobble our law enforcement and fall into total anarchy....There's an attractive future.
RPG seems to feel that we have only 2 choices: letting cops shoot people in the back OR total anarchy. RPG obviously prefers letting cops shoot anyone, at any time. There's an attractive future ! That MAY have worked in the old wild west, but we have hundreds of newer options. The days of shooting first and asking questions later is long passed. We MUST winnow out the Neanderthals and replace them with people who have some common sense and a feeling of humanity. Psychopathic cops are no longer acceptable.
Apparently liberal traveler , and the other morons cannot deal with the honest fact that without strict law enforcement, we will return to the 'wild-west' . We are headed there already, just look at the number of folks carrying a sidearm now, compared to just a few years back.
And more applying for CCW every day.