Out of curiosity, any reason you aren't happy with this method? After having used analog recording in studio in the past, I would readily agree that digital production is really is the only way to go. The number of advantages it has over analog it would fill this forum.
People incorrectly declare MP3s as the "digital standard", but those are really compressed (reduced depth/sample rate) mix-downs of much larger master digital files. I have a simple Digital Audio Workstation (DAW), but even IT works with 32-bit audio, with up to 192KHz bandwidth which is spatially (and physically) huge compared to the MP3s it can produce. The mastering data doesn't suffer from physical decline from storage problems like print-thru, wow/flutter, missing magnetic regions on tape, head bias and wear problems...plus digital recorded data never degrades between transfers of media. Once recorded, it stays in that shape, and can be re-mixed, re-mastered unlimited numbers of times. I am a budding novice in this field, but even my mastering experiments seem to get better and better with every re-master as I learn to use the tools.
The biggest downside to digital, though, is that it is not as simple as plugging in a mic, and hitting record. There is reason the field is called 'Audio Engineering', so I get that it is harder to manage. The biggest upside, as a musician, is that I can cut and paste out note errors, so I sound like a fabulous player!! OK, ok, then how about a good player? Ok, ok, a drunk novice on Paxil. But I am learning!!