No it did not go over my head. I was pointing out one of the reasons for the proliferation of gun violence in the US compared to Canada.And THIS thread is about firearms regulations In Canada, Or did that fact go over your head ? JimB.
No it did not go over my head. I was pointing out one of the reasons for the proliferation of gun violence in the US compared to Canada.And THIS thread is about firearms regulations In Canada, Or did that fact go over your head ? JimB.
The polar bears are the worst, all that fur! And, oh, the stench of partially digested raw seal!I've gotten a new appreciation for this topic after reading all of the comments.
I'm just so thankful that Canada has banned people with bare arms from wrestling armed bears!
Fifty-one percent of Americans favor a nationwide ban on the sale of AR-15 rifles and similar semiautomatic assault weapons, while 32% are opposed. An additional 18% hold neither opinion.I trust myself.
Now, I don't have a Bloomberg corporate media to give me a public platform, but, Just going by the hundreds of folks I know who have guns, I can say without a doubt that every gun I ever saw or knew about was safe. Never used in a crime, never sold on the black market, and never smuggled out of the country.
Does that mean my stat's would prove that guns are perfectly safe? Of course not... there will always be evil out there and evil will always find a way to manifest itself. What my stat's would say is guns are 100% safe in the hands of responsible owners.
Now, Canada has it's own laws and I see no problem with that as I'm not a citizen of that country. However, our country is and still is a constitutional republic and therefore, we the people have a say in this. Therefore, put it to a vote by the people and let the chips fall where they may.
Good point...What if ammunition were banned instead of guns? It is, after all, the ammunition that makes guns such a danger, is it not?
Yep... a poll conducted by AP-Norc. Well, let's dig a bit deeper and dissect this poll.Fifty-one percent of Americans favor a nationwide ban on the sale of AR-15 rifles and similar semiautomatic assault weapons, while 32% are opposed. An additional 18% hold neither opinion.
https://apnorc.org/projects/views-on-assault-weapons-remain-partisan/
If we were to vote on banning AR-15 style rifles, they would get banned. Since that's the case, do you still support a vote on the matter?
I don't see banning ammunition ever happening but I've made my own rifle and handgun ammunition for many years and like the thousands upon thousands of others that do I'm more than well stocked in the components required to do so for a long time to come......components = primers, brass, powder and bullets.What if ammunition were banned instead of guns? It is, after all, the ammunition that makes guns such a danger, is it not?
I had a friend in Montana that was a gun fanatic. He used a handgun for hunting. He would also compete in handgun competitions, sometimes over the border in Canada. I suppose he had a special permit to bring a handgun into Canada for that purpose. I never asked how he got it across the border. He was a cop, so I'm sure he was quite familiar with the rules.I've just never heard of a 'sport' where a handgun is used before. Is there actual competitions for this type of thing?
Wouldn't work for a handloader like me. I make better-quality ammunition than factory produced. And I have the components to make thousands of rounds.What if ammunition were banned instead of guns? It is, after all, the ammunition that makes guns such a danger, is it not?
Your friend would have had to apply, in advance to the Chief Firearms Officer, of the Province in which he wanted to compete. The advance application must be completed BEFORE arriving at the border, on line. The form, and the firearm would be both be reviewed by the Canada Border Services Agency officers at the port of entry, and a temporary importation permit would be issued. On leaving Canada the permit must be returned to the CBSA office at the port of entry. JimB.I had a friend in Montana that was a gun fanatic. He used a handgun for hunting. He would also compete in handgun competitions, sometimes over the border in Canada. I suppose he had a special permit to bring a handgun into Canada for that purpose. I never asked how he got it across the border. He was a cop, so I'm sure he was quite familiar with the rules.
Ammo is very expensive. Handloading for handguns cuts the price in half. Handloading for rifle cartridges isn't as great a savings, but enables a serious shooter to fine tune ammo for a particular rifle & find the most accurate combination of bullet weight, shape, & powder charges.What do you use all that ammo for? Is it target practice?
Banning AR-15 style rifles would definitely decrease the number of mass murders. There's no weapon readily available to the general public that is anywhere near as deadly."One of the most fundamental facts is this: where there are more guns, there are more gun deaths. This should not be a novel or even interesting observation, but rather a widely accepted matter of fact. Yet, because it is a fact that so many choose to ignore, it must be repeated over and over again.
More guns equals more death."
"Across states, researchers found that more guns equal more gun deaths looking at all 50 states in the country from 1981 to 2010.[11] This finding has been replicated in numerous other studies.[12] [13] Importantly, states with both lax gun laws and greater access to guns have higher rates of mass shootings.[14]"
"This does not mean taking guns from law-abiding citizens or preventing someone who goes through the necessary procedures from owning a firearm. But gun violence comes in at least four different forms (i.e., suicide, mass shootings, domestic violence, and urban gun violence) and each requires its own unique policy solutions. The reality is that no single policy will substantially reduce even one type of gun violence, much less all forms put together."
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...UQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1rRRIrtDFUZl16UHmBvE7M
Ya know what's really amusing?Banning AR-15 style rifles would definitely decrease the number of mass murders. There's no weapon readily available to the general public that is anywhere near as deadly.
Maybe I should try "Nugenics [sic] Man Booster!"Ya know what's really amusing?
Someone who lacks firearms knowledge but tries to sound knowledgeable because he thinks guns are a macho thing & he wants to sound.....manly.![]()
A bit of research would be more beneficial. You would then have some knowledge - much better than parroting whatever a news reporter says for dramatic effect.Maybe I should try "Nugenics [sic] Man Booster!"![]()
I had a similar incident in 1996. I had been driving with my RV across the northern U.S. and I decided to cut across Canada at the Detroit/U.S. border to see the sights and see Niagra Falls. There was a sign at Canadian customs to declare any firearms. Since I often had camped at some very lonely spots, I had a hand gun hidden in the RV for self protection and I reported it to them.I went through Canada in 88 and they confiscated my firearm.
I was traveling alone to Alaska and needed it for grizzlies.
It will do nothing IMO, to halt crime.
It just leaves Canada vulnerable.
Of you want to take over a country, first, take away their firearms.
Only makes me more determined to uphold the USA constitution (first and second amendments)
The reason that you were NOT arrested was because you declared that your vehicle contained what is in Canada a " restricted firearm ". The CBSA officer COULD have seized the pistol AND charged you with a indictable offence ( we don't have felonies in Canada ) and you would have been off to jail and later a trial. Upon conviction you COULD have received a prison sentence of up to 14 years. The CBSA officer would have entered your identity in the CPIC national criminal records files before you went back across the border, and if you ever attempt to enter our country again, your record will immediately come up on the computer screen at the first inspection booth, and you will be sent for secondary inspection. Remember...Our Country...Our Rules. JimB,.I had a similar incident in 1996. I had been driving with my RV across the northern U.S. and I decided to cut across Canada at the Detroit/U.S. border to see the sights and see Niagra Falls. There was a sign at Canadian customs to declare any firearms. Since I often had camped at some very lonely spots, I had a hand gun hidden in the RV for self protection and I reported it to them.
The Canadian customs really made a big deal about my pistol. Together, we went into the Rv and I was about to fetch it from it's hiding place when the agent said, "STOP ! Don't touch it " He acted like I might shoot him . He wanted to confiscate it , and gave me a big lecture saying that it was illegal in the U.S. to transport guns. He did not like it one bit when i told him, "Wrong ! As long as no driver/passenger can access it while moving, it is perfectly legal. " He said you may not enter Canada with any gun. I replied, "Ok, fine. Put the gun back in it's hiding place and I'll go back into the U.S. Which I did.
Ok, your country, your rules. However, if a thug tried to break into my RV in the middle of the night, while I was traveling in Canada, I'd be completely helpless without a gun.The reason that you were NOT arrested was because you declared that your vehicle contained what is in Canada a " restricted firearm ". The CBSA officer COULD have seized the pistol AND charged you with a indictable offence ( we don't have felonies in Canada ) and you would have been off to jail and later a trial. Upon conviction you COULD have received a prison sentence of up to 14 years. The CBSA officer would have entered your identity in the CPIC national criminal records files before you went back across the border, and if you ever attempt to enter our country again, your record will immediately come up on the computer screen at the first inspection booth, and you will be sent for secondary inspection. Remember...Our Country...Our Rules. JimB,.
What are the handgun laws in Mexico where you live now?Ok, your country, your rules. However, if a thug tried to break into my RV in the middle of the night, while I was traveling in Canada, I'd be completely helpless without a gun.
Nicely done. Lets see if he will answer, or not. JimB.What are the handgun laws in Mexico where you live now?