Furryanimal
Y gath o Gymru
- Location
- Wales
Blinken says White House discussing prospect of a Russian oil ban as pleas increaseSource: MSNU.S. leaders showed increasing support for a ban on Russian oil imports on Sunday, indicating what could be a step forward in heeding one of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s pleas, as the invasion of his country continues. Zelenskyy on Saturday spoke with members of Congress, asking for actions to knee-cap Russia and aid the Ukrainian resistance to Vladimir Putin's attacks. Though White House leaders initially appeared resistant to one of his major asks — sanctions on Russian oil imports — the U.S. secretary of State on Sunday morning struck a less averse tone. He said he spoke with the president and other Cabinet officials on “exactly this subject” the day prior. “We are now talking to our European partners and allies to look in a coordinated way at the prospect of banning the import of Russian oil, while making sure that there is still an appropriate supply of oil on world markets,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “That's a very active discussion as we speak.” Previously, White House press secretary Jen Psaki had told reporters Friday that the administration was looking at actions to cut U.S. consumption of energy from Moscow, but added that the White House was “very focused on minimizing the impact to families” and expressed concern that a ban could raise gas prices. Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-russian-oil-ban-as-pleas-increase/ar-AAUGQmR |
Ukraine was a NEUTRAL country before the invasion. Not a part of Nato or EU and still isn't.As I noted at the war's start, media, especially suppressed US media, as the horror drags on, would increasingly be showing a minority of expert voices that have promoted neutrality. An unpleasant yet pragmatic way forward given the obvious stubborn stalemate that is the current useless sad state of the game of chicken waiting for the other side to blink with signs of non-commitment, each side has played. If one Yahoo or Google searches with "NATO neutral", one will see plenty of other non-USA media news articles and opinions have been pointing to neutrality long beyond the start of the conflict.
A Trump-appointed former senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense says Russian forces have been 'too gentle' on Ukraine and called Zelensky a 'puppet'
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-appointed-former-senior-adviser-073609454.html
snippets:
..."I don't see anything heroic about the man [Zelenski]," Macgregor said. "I think the most heroic thing he could do right now is come to terms with reality. Neutralize Ukraine." He continued: "This is not a bad thing. A neutral Ukraine would be good for us and Russia. It would create the buffer that frankly both sides want but he's I think being told I think to hold on and trying to drag this out, which is tragic for the people that have to live through this."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/09/conflict-mediator-ukraine-vladimir-putin
I’m a conflict mediator. This is a way out of the Ukraine crisis
One way through this would be for Nato to declare Ukraine a neutral country and decree that it does not join Nato for at least a decade. In practice, Ukrainian membership of the EU is ruled out for at least a generation because of Ukraine’s corruption, political dysfunction and lack of economic progress. Talks between Putin and France’s President Macron this week were more conciliatory in tone. Macron said: “There is no security for Europeans if there is no security for Russia.”...
Ukraine was a...
I think you are a Russian troll and shall just ignore you.
I have great respect for the opinion of Fareed Zakaria. Very knowledgeable, compassionate man.Hallelujah! I just listened to CNN's Fareed Zakaria proclaim in no uncertain terms that the US must step up oil production and produce every drop possible, thereby halting Russian oil purchases and getting us in a position to support our European allies. Oil exports are a key to Russia's economy and it is the only way to hurt them and stop Putin.
Our current administration is "between a rock and a hard place" between relying on oil and trying to avoid climate change.The current administration killed our pipelines, (from which oil came from our Canadian Allies by the way), killed coal, banned drilling. All of this has made us partially dependent on Russian oil, which has made Russia very wealthy. If Putin is the “bad guy,” and Russia is so evil, why are we continuing to buy billion of dollars worth of oil from Russia every day? Does this make any sense?
I’m for “America First.” I'm sorry, but this doesn't pass the smell test.
This war is B.S. It doesn’t involve us. We should not be sending billions of dollars in aid, or sending billions of dollars in military weapons to Ukraine. I don’t want this to turn into WWIII. I don’t want my children, or your children dying over Ukraine.
We need to stay a million miles away from this conflict.
Just had another thought. If the Ukraine is doing so well at destroying Russian equipment and troops, (as it seems to be reported in newspapers everywhere), why are we needed?
Again... the smell test
Okay... I'll wait.Our current administration is "between a rock and a hard place" between relying on oil and trying to avoid climate change.
https://www.americanrivers.org/2022...V4BayoQpYub1-RCXlMLhMnIhiSjhh8zBoCuw4QAvD_BwE
If you don't believe in climate change, just wait until it hits your area like it did ours in Texas last year when over 200 people died because of cold temps and no electricity. Apply your "smell test" to this.
View attachment 211933
Washington — Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Sunday that NATO members have the go-ahead to send fighter jets to Ukraine as the U.S. and allies continue their efforts to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia's invasion………………
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-war-fighter-jets-antony-blinken-face-the-nation/
At least someone here has the facts right. I was beginning to think all Americans were completely ignorant of the truth!Ukraine was a NEUTRAL country before the invasion. Not a part of Nato or EU and still isn't.
Ukraine gave up it nukes in a guarantee from Russia for safety. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine held about one third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, the third largest in the world at the time, as well as significant means of its design and production.[2] 130 UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) with six warheads each, 46 RT-23 Molodets ICBMs with ten warheads apiece, as well as 33 heavy bombers, totaling approximately 1,700 warheads remained on Ukrainian territory.[3] Formally, these weapons were controlled by the Commonwealth of Independent States.[4] In 1994, Ukraine agreed to destroy the weapons, and to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Russia built up forces around Ukraine for months, they had no intentions for Ukraine to be neutral. If we gave in now, all Europe is vulnerable. Since Alaska was once part of Russia, should we give that back as well if threatened by Russia?
I think you are a Russian troll and shall just ignore you.
Oh come on Lavinia, are you deliberately trying to piss people off? No, all people are never at the same level just as all people from England are not rude. "all Americans were completely ignorant of the truth!"At least someone here has the facts right. I was beginning to think all Americans were completely ignorant of the truth!