TonyK
Member
- Location
- Central New York
Tony, you're correct. I must be getting senile. I can't even do basic math anymore. hahaha![]()
I'd say you need to take a refresher course but you know how dangerous our schools are.
Tony, you're correct. I must be getting senile. I can't even do basic math anymore. hahaha![]()
Most of us don't think the blame can be laid entirely on the doorstep of the types and numbers of guns that Americans own, but they sure don't help the situation. This is a multi-layered problem that will take a multi-layered solution.
Teaching hate is in itself a bad idea. Tolerance is a much better way to go.
There have been some interesting inputs on this thread. Real happy to see that there are some not willing to lay all the blame on guns.
Did any of you folks take a look and the Swiss culture where guns are pretty much for all to see and have with them in their lives with little or no tragic events due to the guns?
Did any of you folks read the link I put up that tells of the Swiss ways of building bomb shelters and airports.
I was very impressed by their determination for self defense. The Swiss have had this selfdefense idea since way back in horses and bows and arrows. They have done well with their ideas.
Hopefully the US will one day get our own ideas of right and wrong straightened out again. It is not the guns at all, it is our own mind sets that need adjusted.
The easy access to guns in the United States is a problem.
Exactly, Camper. There are angry people, seriously disturbed people, uninvolved parents, idiot-level parents who don't know how to keep their own kids out of danger, macho showoffs, hotheads without a single brain in their heads, etc. all over the world. This country does not have a monopoly on any of those things. But after you factor out all those other things, what's the one thing that is different here? Right, the easy access to guns!
And for those who use "hunting" as their excuse for keeping all those guns lying around, I'd like to know where their sacred second amendment fits in. Do they "bear arms" against the local deer population?
Amendments can and should be abolished when they are clearly causing more harm than good. Times change, and everything that was mandated in the old days is not always still a good idea. What does any of this have to do with the well-regulated militia of Colonial times?
Exactly, Camper. There are angry people, seriously disturbed people, uninvolved parents, idiot-level parents who don't know how to keep their own kids out of danger, macho showoffs, hotheads without a single brain in their heads, etc. all over the world. This country does not have a monopoly on any of those things. But after you factor out all those other things, what's the one thing that is different here? Right, the easy access to guns!
And for those who use "hunting" as their excuse for keeping all those guns lying around, I'd like to know where their sacred second amendment fits in. Do they "bear arms" against the local deer population?
Amendments can and should be abolished when they are clearly causing more harm than good. Times change, and everything that was mandated in the old days is not always still a good idea. What does any of this have to do with the well-regulated militia of Colonial times?
We bear arms against criminals who are always going to have guns, no matter what the law says. Without guns we are easy prey. Any discussion of banning guns is a waste of time because it is never, ever going to happen. Not today, not tomorrow, not in 100 years. Never !
In most of Africa, the AK-47 is easier and cheaper to get than a used car. Yet we do not see teens in those countries killing their fellow students. The problem of killing in our schools is parents that are totally uninvolved, coupled with a host of other causes.
No one will ever convince me that guns are the problem. Most of us were raised in homes where guns were commonplace and yet managed to not massacre anyone. The core of the problem is societal and the disintegration of family. People are so angry... just look at all the road rage now. It's terrifying to drive anywhere.
I don't know how we will fix this mess.
Letting go of ANY of your rights is a very slippery slope.
Well phrased Traveler. There was one "kid killer" who felt bullied. As kids we all felt bullied but we were taught to deal with it. But now bullying has become a large political issue to the point were kids feel they do not have to deal with it - someone else is responsible to protect them. It is the "snowflake" syndrome where kids have been raised to never have to deal with any disappointment so when one comes along, their reaction may be violent.
Strongly agree.
We bear arms against criminals who are always going to have guns, no matter what the law says. Without guns we are easy prey. Any discussion of banning guns is a waste of time because it is never, ever going to happen. Not today, not tomorrow, not in 100 years. Never !
In most of Africa, the AK-47 is easier and cheaper to get than a used car. Yet we do not see teens in those countries killing their fellow students. The problem of killing in our schools is parents that are totally uninvolved, coupled with a host of other causes.
One reason that no amendments have been written and processed is because non enough of our government, no matter what party 8s involved, has been convinced that guns are the problem.
Perhaps because the gun lobby has them in their pocket?
Again, the Swiss have no crazies running around and shooting others. They have gun clubs and national shootouts during the year. The Swiss do not have the nutty self important nonsense we have taught in our schools and colleges. They should be teaching how to get along with each other and not how to stop others from doing what they are doing. Street mobs and hatred are not good things to push by ourn education systems.
I strongly disagree. If you address these issues as soon as they manifest themselves, the recidivism rate is low. I have had nine year olds in my office learning skill sets on how to deal with negative emotions including anger. They progressed very well.You cannot teach anger management. Well you can but it won't stick.
Any excuse but the guns in the U.S. huh? How you can leave that out of the equation is simply beyond me.
The U.S. should be the leader in the field instead of the follower.
Yes you are entitled to having a weapon for protection but do you need an AK-47 or an AR-15? These weapons were designed for the battlefield not for civilians to protect themselves against what? A herd of Bison?